Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:49:32.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ex vivo development of Phasmarhabditis spp. associated with terrestrial molluscs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2022

A. Pieterse
Affiliation:
Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
S. Haukeland
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (icipe), PO Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), PO Box 115, NO-1431 Ås, Norway
V. Půža
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Entomopathogenic Nematodes, Biology Centre CAS, Institute of Entomology, Branišovská 1160/31, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
J.L. Ross*
Affiliation:
Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, UK
A.P. Malan
Affiliation:
Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland 7602, South Africa
*
Author for correspondence: J.L. Ross, E-mail: jenna.ross@abdn.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The success of Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita (Schneider) Andrássy (Rhabditida: Rhabditidae) as a biological control agent of molluscs has led to a worldwide interest in phasmarhabditids. However, scant information is available on the lifecycle development of species within the genus. In the current study, the development of P. hermaphrodita, Phasmarhabditis papillosa, Phasmarhabditis bohemica and Phasmarhabditis kenyaensis were studied using ex vivo cultures, in order to improve our understanding of their biology. Infective juveniles (IJs) of each species were added to 1 g of defrosted homogenized slug cadavers of Deroceras invadens and the development monitored after inoculated IJ recovery, over a period of eight–ten days. The results demonstrated that P. bohemica had the shortest development cycle and that it was able to produce first-generation IJs after eight days, while P. hermaphrodita, P. papillosa and P. kenyaensis took ten days to form a new cohort of IJs. However, from the perspective of mass rearing, P. hermaphrodita has an advantage over the other species in that it is capable of forming self-fertilizing hermaphrodites, whereas both males and females are required for the reproduction of P. papillosa, P. bohemica and P. kenyaensis. The results of the study contribute to the knowledge of the biology of the genus and will help to establish the in vitro liquid cultures of different species of the genus.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The ex vivo development of 100 IJs on 1 g of homogenized Deroceras invadens over a period of ten days for (a) Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, (b) Phasmarhabditis papillosa, (c) Phasmarhabditis kenyaensis and (d) Phasmarhabditis bohemica. The lines indicate when the population of each stage was less than 10% of the maximum.

Figure 1

Table 1. Mean body length and width (μm) of the different life stages of Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, Phasmarhabditis papillosa, Phasmarhabditis bohemica and Phasmarhabditis kenyaensis at specific days after inoculation (DAI) with infective juveniles (IJs), for the duration of the development of 100 IJs on 1 g of Deroceras invadens homogenized tissue.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. IJs of (a) Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, (b) Phasmarhabditis papillosa, (c) Phasmarhabditis bohemica and (d) Phasmarhabditis kenyaensis. Scale bars: (a–c) 100 μm; (d) 200 μm.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Images of (a) hermaphrodite of Phasmarhabditis hermaphrodita, (b) female Phasmarhabditis papillosa, (c) female Phasmarhabditis bohemica and (d) female Phasmarhabditis kenyaensis. Scale bars: 200 μm.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Images of males of (a) Phasmarhabditis papillosa, (b) Phasmarhabditis bohemica and (c) Phasmarhabditis kenyaensis. Scale bars: (a, b) 100 μm; (c) 200 μm.