Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T13:18:32.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ventricular septal defect: diagnosis and treatments in the neonates: a systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2020

Ahmed Adan
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK
Loay Eleyan
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK
Mariam Zaidi
Affiliation:
Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
Amr Ashry
Affiliation:
Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Alder Hey Children Hospital, Liverpool, UK Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt
Ram Dhannapuneni
Affiliation:
Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Alder Hey Children Hospital, Liverpool, UK
Amer Harky*
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, UK Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Alder Hey Children Hospital, Liverpool, UK Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Amer Harky, MBChB MRCS, MSc, Department of Congenital Cardiac Surgery, Alder Hey Children Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP, United Kingdom. Tel: +44-151-228-4811. E-mail: aaharky@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Medical advancements have encouraged minimally invasive surgical repair of congenital heart defects such as ventricular septal defects (VSDs), and the diagnostic process can now be carried out using non-traditional techniques such as pulse oximetry. This, in turn, has improved clinical outcomes with reduced complication rates post-surgery. However, the variations in type of VSDs, age of patient, comorbidities, and access to closure devices may limit the efficacy of surgical advancements.

Methods:

Articles were identified amongst Scopus, MEDLINE, and PubMed using various relevant search strings using PRISMA guidelines. Of the 115 articles initially extracted, 10 were eventually reviewed after duplicates and irrelevant studies were removed.

Results:

Of the 24 eligible articles, 10 papers were selected for analysis. Minimally invasive approaches to VSD repair was associated with satisfactory short-term outcomes when compared to open repair. For diagnosis of congenital VSD, whilst recent advances such as pulse oximetry method and genome analysis are more sensitive, the limited availability and access to such investigatory methods must be recognised.

Conclusion:

Pulse oximetry and fetal echocardiography are established non-invasive diagnostic tools for VSD. The recent advances in minimally invasive treatment options including periventricular approach and transcatheter techniques have improved patient outcomes, yet at the expense of higher residual rates. Careful patient selection for each technique and follow-up should be planned through multidisciplinary team meetings.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. PRISMA chart of search results.

Figure 1

Table 1. Summary of study characteristics included in this review.

Figure 2

Table 2. Outline of the genetic and environmental factors attributing to VSD.

Figure 3

Table 3. Comparative outcomes of studies reporting on minimally invasive versus open repair of ventricular septal defect (VSD).