Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T22:26:00.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parasitic infections in mixed system-based heliciculture farms: dynamics and key epidemiological factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2013

P. SEGADE
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, Facultad de Biología, Edificio de Ciencias Experimentales, Campus de Lagoas-Marcosende s/n, Universidad de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain
J. GARCÍA-ESTÉVEZ
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, Facultad de Biología, Edificio de Ciencias Experimentales, Campus de Lagoas-Marcosende s/n, Universidad de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain
C. ARIAS
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, Facultad de Biología, Edificio de Ciencias Experimentales, Campus de Lagoas-Marcosende s/n, Universidad de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain
R. IGLESIAS*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Parasitología, Facultad de Biología, Edificio de Ciencias Experimentales, Campus de Lagoas-Marcosende s/n, Universidad de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain
*
*Corresponding author: Laboratorio de Parasitología, Facultad de Biología (Edificio de Ciencias Experimentales), Campus de Lagoas-Marcosende s/n, Universidad de Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain. Tel: +34 986812394. Fax: +34 986812565. E-mail: rib@uvigo.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Heliciculture is an excellent alternative to obtain edible snails but its viability is seriously threatened by pathogens. A parasitological survey was conducted in 3 mixed system-based heliciculture farms in Galicia (NW Spain), with the species Tetrahymena rostrata, Tetrahymena limacis, Tetratrichomonas limacis, Cryptobia helicogenae, Brachylaima aspersae (metacercariae and sporocysts), Alloionema appendiculatum, Nemhelix bakeri, and Riccardoella limacum being commonly found infecting Helix aspersa aspersa (petit-gris) snails. With the exception of C. helicogenae, N. bakeri, and B. aspersae sporocysts, all species were also detected in Helix aspersa maxima (gros-gris) snails, although generally with lower parameters. Most monoxenous infections, and consequently multiple parasitism, exhibited a rising trend during the first 2 months of intensive mating, with tendencies being slowed down or even reversed during the third month as a result of accumulated mortality and a sampling-derived reduction in host density. No parasites were vertically transmitted and infections were initially acquired from invading gastropod and micromammal reservoirs during fattening. Finally, artificial hibernation reduced significantly the prevalence of most species. These results confirm the importance of parasites in heliciculture and emphasize the need to prevent the entry of wild reservoirs into the farms and to rapidly remove the carcasses of dead snails from the reproduction units and fattening pens.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
Figure 0

Table 1. Infection parameters and main sites of infection for the 8 species of parasites which were commonly detected in the farmed (groups F1-F7) and wild (groups W1-W3) Helix a. aspersa snails examined in the cross-sectional study

(For each host group and parasite species the prevalence, expressed in percentage, with the number of infected/examined hosts in parentheses is presented above, while mean intensities/densities with the corresponding range in parentheses are given below (n.d.: not determined; BC, bursa copulatrix; DG, digestive gland; DT, digestive tract; GT, genital tract; F, foot tissues; K, kidney; M, mantle collar; PC, pallial cavity; PP, pulmonary plexus).)
Figure 1

Table 2. Infection parameters and main sites of infection for the 6 species that were found parasitizing the farmed Helix a. maxima snails (groups F8-11) examined in the cross-sectional study

(For each host group and parasite species the prevalence, expressed in percentage, with the number of infected/examined hosts in parentheses is presented above, while mean intensities/densities with the corresponding range in parentheses are given below (n.d.: not determined; DT, digestive tract; F, foot tissues; K, kidney; M, mantle collar; PC, pallial cavity; PP, pulmonary plexus).)
Figure 2

Fig. 1. Typical appearance of the main parasites detected in Helix aspersa snails. (A) Numerous T. rostrata ciliates swimming in a wet mount from a pulmonary plexus scraping. Note the presence of 2 dividing ciliates (arrows). Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Silver impregnated T. rostrata ciliate showing the numerous somatic kineties as well as the cytostomic area (c). Scale bar = 30 μm. (C) Silver impregnated T. limacis ciliate. Scale bar = 20 μm. (D) Giemsa-stained T. limacis flagellate in which the 4 anterior (af) and the free posterior (pf) flagella, the undulating membrane (um), the nucleus (n) and the axostyle (a) can be easily visualized. Scale bar = 5 μm. (E) Numerous pleomorphic C. helicogenae flagellates (arrows) in a bursa copulatrix touch preparation as observed with phase-contrast microscopy. Scale bar = 40 μm. (F) Protargol-impregnated C. helicogenae flagellates showing the anterior (af) and adherent flagella (adf), the nucleus (n) and the species-specific aciculum (ac). Scale bar = 20 μm. (G) Macroscopic appearance of a large whitish sporocyst mass (arrow) of B. aspersae occupying a great part of the digestive gland of a H. a. aspersa snail. (H) Detail of the microcercous cercariae contained in the branched sporocyst of B. aspersae. Scale bar = 100 μm. (I) Mature non-encysted metacercariae of B. aspersae in a wet renal touch preparation. Scale bar = 200 μm. (J) Wet mount from a pulmonary plexus scraping showing a parasitic larval stage of A. appendiculatum (arrows) surrounded by host infiltration tissue. Scale bar = 200 μm. (K) Posterior and cephalic region (inset; phase-contrast microscopy) of an adult male of A. appendiculatum showing the characteristic spicules (s) and gubernaculum (g) as well as the numerous denticles (arrow) on the dorsal metarhabdion of the buccal cavity. Scale bar = 100 μm. (L) Cephalic region of an adult of N. bakeri. Scale bar = 100 μm. (M) Posterior region of a male of N. bakeri showing the characteristic spicules (s) and gubernaculum (g). Scale bar = 50 μm. (N) Numerous R. limacum mites moving in the pallial cavity of a snail (whitish forms are larval and nymphal stages while yellowish forms are adults). (O) Microscopic appearance of an adult R. limacum. Scale bar = 100 μm.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Histological appearance of the different endoparasites infecting Helix aspersa in their respective microhabitats. (A) Numerous T. rostrata trophozoites occupying the lumen of some folds of renal tissue. Note that infected folds lack epithelium which has been ingested by the histophagous ciliates. The presence of the small round micronucleus (m) adjacent to the macronucleus permits to differentiate the ciliate from host cells (inset). (B) A T. limacis ciliate in the lumen of a digestive gland duct. The micronucleus (m) and macronucleus can also help to identify this ciliate (inset). Note that this species presents large vacuoles in the cytoplasm while T. rostrata exhibits a faintly eosinophilic fine granular content. (C) Numerous T. limacis flagellates (arrowheads) embedded in the intestinal content (ep: intestinal epithelium). The elongated nucleus (n) in the eosinophilic cytoplasm can be visualized in sections stained with H&E (inset). (D) Section of a bursa copulatrix heavily infected with C. helicogenae flagellates (arrow heads) with the protozoa distributed luminally between the internal epithelium (ep) and the concentric layers resulting from the degradation of the spermatophore head (s) after copulation. The small rounded nucleus (n) and the elongated kinetoplast (k) can be visualized in some flagellates (inset). (E) Four metacercariae of B. aspersae in the lumen of several renal folds. The presence of suckers (arrowheads) facilitates their identification in histological sections. (F) Section of a digestive gland heavily infected by a branched cercariogenic sporocyst of B. aspersae, with a detail of longitudinally sectioned cercariae (inset) in which the suckers can be easily distinguished (arrowheads). (G) Section of the foot tissues of a snail infected with a larval stage of the tissular parasite A. appendiculatum. Note that the larva is surrounded by a marked granulomatous-like response (encircled). A nematode transversally sectioned is shown in the inset. (H) Section of the genital apparatus showing the luminal microhabitat of the nematode N. bakeri and the absence of pathological changes in the genital epithelium. Scale bars for A, B, C, D and G = 100 μm; for H = 200 μm; for E and F = 400 μm.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Percentage of uninfected (0), single-infected (1) and multiparasitized (2 to 6 species) snails observed in the cross-sectional study (A) and during intensive mating of Helix a. aspersa (B) and H. a. maxima (C) (HAAf and HAAw: farmed and wild H. a. aspersa, respectively; HAMf: farmed H. a. maxima).

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Evolution of prevalence (%) of the main parasites in the 3 groups (F1, F2 and F6) of Helix a. aspersa (A-I) and the 4 groups (F8-F11) of H. a. maxima (J-O) during the 3-month intensive mating period (A and J) T. rostrata; (B and K) T. limacis (ciliate); (C and L) T. limacis (flagellate); (D) C. helicogenae; (E and M) B. aspersae metacercariae; (F) B. aspersae sporocysts; (G) N. bakeri; (H and N) A. appendiculatum; (I and O) R. limacum).

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Evolution of the mean intensity/density of the main parasites in the 3 groups (F1, F2 and F6) of Helix a. aspersa (A-F) and the 4 groups (F8-F11) of H. a. maxima (G-K) during the 3-month intensive mating period. (A and G) T. rostrata; (B and H) T. limacis (ciliate); (C and I) B. aspersae metacercariae; (D) N. bakeri; (E and J) A. appendiculatum; (F and K) R. limacum).

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Effect of artificial hibernation on the prevalence of parasites infecting Helix a. aspersa (A) and H. a. maxima (B) and on the frequency of multiparasitic infections observed in both subspecies (C). In graphs A and B, prevalences registered before (light gray) and after (dark gray) hibernation are represented in pairs for each parasite species. Asterisks indicate significant differences between prevalence values obtained before and after hibernation (P < 0·05) (TRO, T. rostrata; TLI, T. limacis (ciliate); TET, T. limacis (flagellate); CHE, C. helicogenae; BRAm, B. aspersa metacercariae; BRAs, B. aspersa sporocysts; AAP, A. appendiculatum; NBA, N. bakeri; RLI, R. limacum). In graph C, HAA1/HAA2 and HAM1/HAM2 mean H. a. aspersa and H. a. maxima before (1) and after (2) hibernation, respectively.