Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T14:19:43.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seed production potential evaluation of sugar beet half-sib families in Morocco

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2021

G. Tobi*
Affiliation:
Research Unit of Plant Improvement Conservation and Development of Phytogenetic Resources, Regional Center of Agricultural Research of Rabat, B. P. 6570, Rabat-Instituts, 10101-INRA, Rabat, Morocco Research Unit of Applied Biotechnologies in Agriculture, Agrobiodiversity and Local Products, Department of Plant Protection Production and Biotechnology, Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, BP 6202- 10101-Rabat-Instituts, Rabat, Morocco
O. Benlhabib
Affiliation:
Research Unit of Applied Biotechnologies in Agriculture, Agrobiodiversity and Local Products, Department of Plant Protection Production and Biotechnology, Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, BP 6202- 10101-Rabat-Instituts, Rabat, Morocco
S. Oumouss
Affiliation:
Research Unit of Plant Improvement Conservation and Development of Phytogenetic Resources, Regional Center of Agricultural Research of Rabat, B. P. 6570, Rabat-Instituts, 10101-INRA, Rabat, Morocco
I. Rahmouni
Affiliation:
Research Unit of Plant Improvement Conservation and Development of Phytogenetic Resources, Regional Center of Agricultural Research of Rabat, B. P. 6570, Rabat-Instituts, 10101-INRA, Rabat, Morocco
A. Douaik
Affiliation:
Research Unit of Plant Improvement Conservation and Development of Phytogenetic Resources, Regional Center of Agricultural Research of Rabat, B. P. 6570, Rabat-Instituts, 10101-INRA, Rabat, Morocco
A. Birouk
Affiliation:
Research Unit of Applied Biotechnologies in Agriculture, Agrobiodiversity and Local Products, Department of Plant Protection Production and Biotechnology, Hassan II Institute of Agronomy and Veterinary Medicine, BP 6202- 10101-Rabat-Instituts, Rabat, Morocco
Y. E. Bahloul
Affiliation:
Research Unit of Plant Improvement Conservation and Development of Phytogenetic Resources, Regional Center of Agricultural Research of Rabat, B. P. 6570, Rabat-Instituts, 10101-INRA, Rabat, Morocco
*
Author for correspondence: G. Tobi, E-mail: g.tobi@iav.ac.ma
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Morocco, sugar-beet seed production represents a new challenge to meet the main breeding programme goals. The identification of a suitable zone for plant vernalization represents a bottleneck for seed production. This study aimed chiefly at evaluating the vernalization aptitude of 18 sugar beet half-sib progenies. Trials were conducted during three selection cycles in a specifically chosen environment. The experimental site of Merchouch is 40 km south-east of Rabat city. Field trials design is according to an open-pollinated experimental block. Yield components and five phenological traits were recorded during the growing cycle and at the plant maturation. The variance analysis showed a significant effect of the selection cycle on the phenological traits and grain yield. The plant cycle duration increased by 10.7 days between the first and the third selection cycles. According to the principal component analysis and the hierarchical clustering, F2, F5, F6, F9, F10, F11, F14 and F15 half-sib progenies are described as long cycle and high grain yield families. Grain yield reached 257.3 g per plant, the duration to maturity 350.6 days and the germination rate 93%. The three selection cycles and the suitability of the site vernalization conditions are potentially effective for seed production progress. Our results are relevant as they established an adequate site for the sugar beet seed production. The half-sib selection is a valuable method for sugar beet germplasm enhancement.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Studied HSFs during three selection cycles for seed production evaluation

Figure 1

Table 2. Average of the principal selection criteria of the half-sib progenies after a cycle of selection

Figure 2

Table 3. Mean, minimum, maximum and sd for the studied parameters

Figure 3

Table 4. One-way ANOVA to evaluate the categorical variable (HSF/selection cycle) effect on quantitative traits

Figure 4

Fig. 1. (Colour online) Means (±sd) of the 18 HSFs' flowering period duration (DF) (a) and maturity duration (DM) (b) during the three selection cycles, C1, C2 and C3.

Figure 5

Table 5. Analyses of variance for phenological parameters

Figure 6

Table 6. Analyses of variance of the seed quality parameters

Figure 7

Table 7. Group of means revealed by the Tukey's HSD test for the studied parameters according to three selection cycles

Figure 8

Table 8. Multiple linear regressions model for dependent variables and predictors (HSF and selection cycle)

Figure 9

Table 9. Eigen values of principal components (PC: Dim.1, Dim.2, Dim.3 and Dim.4)

Figure 10

Fig. 2. Projection of the variables on the factor plane (Dim.1; Dim.2) for the PCA of seed production potential of the selected 18 HSFs during the third selection cycle.

Figure 11

Table 10. Coordinates of the variables on the first five principal components of the PCA

Figure 12

Fig. 3. (Colour online) Projection of the selected 18 HSFs during the third selection cycle on the factor plane (Dim.1; Dim.2) for the PCA of seed production parameters.

Figure 13

Fig. 4. (Colour online) Projection of the selected 78 progenies of 18 HSFs in the third selection cycle on the factor plane (Dim.1; Dim.2) for the PCA of seed production parameters.

Figure 14

Fig. 5. (Colour online) Factor map, representation of the clusters on the map induced by the first two principal components for the selected 78 progenies of 18 HSFs in the third selection cycle.

Figure 15

Table 11. HSFs and corresponding codes of their 78 progenies selected in the third selection cycle

Figure 16

Table 12. Link between the cluster variable and the quantitative variables for the ascending hierarchical classification

Figure 17

Table 13. Link between the cluster variable and the quantitative variables for the ascending hierarchical classification

Figure 18

Table 14. Five best individuals closest to the centre (paragons) of the five clusters of the ascending hierarchical classification

Supplementary material: File

Tobi et al. supplementary material

Tobi et al. supplementary material

Download Tobi et al. supplementary material(File)
File 307.2 KB