Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:08:52.635Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue true
  • English
  • Français

Comparing French syllabification in preliterate children and adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

JEREMY GOSLIN  and
CAROLINE FLOCCIA
JEREMY GOSLIN
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, UK
CAROLINE FLOCCIA
Affiliation:
University of Plymouth, UK, University of Franche-Comté, France, and University of Provence, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The influence of development and literacy upon syllabification in French was evaluated by comparing the segmental behavior of 4- to 5-year-old preliterate children and adults using a pause insertion task. Participants were required to repeat bisyllabic words such as “fourmi” (ant) by inserting a pause between its two syllabic components (/fur/-/mi/). In the first experiment we tested segmentation over a range of 49 double intervocalic consonant clusters. A similar general segmentation behavior was observed in both age groups, with a pattern that fit the predictions from a legality principle-based model of syllabification. Experiment 2 revealed that opacity between phonological and orthographic representations lead to increased ambisyllabic responses and a reduction in segmentation consistency in adults. In total, these findings indicate that syllabic forms are consistently represented from an early age, but that segmentation in metalinguistic tasks is susceptible to contamination from spelling and etymological knowledge.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Applied Psycholinguistics , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 341 - 367
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

References

Abercrombie D. (1965). A phonetician's view of verse structure. In D. Abercrombie (Ed.), Studies in phonetics and linguistics (pp. 16– 25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Abercrombie D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Chicago: Aldine.
Bannert R. (1998). Temporal aspects of liaison consonants and their word initial correspondences in French. PHONUM, Reports in Phonetics, 6, 29– 49.Google Scholar
Bertoncini J., Floccia C., Nazzi T., & Mehler J. (1995). Morae and syllables: Rhythmical basis of speech representations in neonates. Language and Speech, 38, 311– 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijeljac-Babic R., Bertoncini J., & Mehler J. (1993). How do 4-day-old infants categorize multisyllabic utterances? Developmental Psychology, 29, 711– 721.Google Scholar
Boë L. J., & Tubach J. P. (1992). De A à Zut, dictionnaire phonétique du Français parlé.Ellug, France: Université Grenoble.
Bradley D. C., Sanchez-Casas R. M., & Garcia-Albea J. E. (1993). The status of the syllable in the perception of Spanish and English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 197– 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Clopper C. G., & Pisoni D. B. (2004). Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects. Language and Speech, 47, 207– 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Content A., Dumay N., & Frauenfelder U. H. (1999). Segmentation syllabique chez l'enfant.Paper presented at the Journées d'Etudes Linguistiques—La syllabe, Université de Nantes.
Content A., Kearns R. K., & Frauenfelder U. H. (2001). Boundaries versus onsets in syllabic segmentation. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 177– 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Content A., Meunier C., Kearns R. K., & Frauenfelder U. H. (2001). Sequence detection in pseudowords in French: Where is the syllable effect? Language and Cognitive Processes, 16, 609– 636.Google Scholar
Content A., Mousty P., & Radeau M. (1990). BRULEX. Une base de données lexicales informatisées pour le français écrit et parlé. L'Année Psychologique, 90, 551– 566.Google Scholar
Cutler A., Mehler J., Norris D., & Segui J. (1986). The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 385– 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell F. (1995). Consonant clusters and phonological syllables in French. Lingua, 95, 5– 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing B. L. (1992). A “pause-break” task for eliciting syllable boundary judgments from literate and illiterate speakers: Preliminary results for five diverse languages. Language and Speech, 35, 219– 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra T, Roelofs A, & Fieuws S. (1995). Orthographic effects on phoneme monitoring. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 264– 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri L., & Wilce L. (1986). The influence of spellings on speech: Are alveolar flaps /d/ or /t/? In D. Yaden & S. Templeton (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness and beginning literacy (pp. 101– 114). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Fallows D. (1981). Experimental evidence for English syllabification and syllable structure. Journal of Linguistics, 17, 309– 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrand L., & Segui J. (1998). The syllable's role in speech production: Are syllables chunks, schemas, or both? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 253– 258.Google Scholar
Flipo D., Gaulle B., & Vancauwenberghe K. (1994). Motifs français de césure typographique. Cahiers Gutenberg, 18, 35– 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floccia C., Goslin J.Bouketir N., & Bradmetz J. (1999). Consonant cluster syllabification in preliterate children. Paper presented at the Journées d'Etudes Linguistiques—La syllabe, Université de Nantes.
Frauenfelder U. H., Segui J., & Dijkstra T. (1990). Lexical effects in phoneme processing: Facilitatory or inhibitory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 77– 91.Google Scholar
Gillis S., & De Schutter G. (1996). Intuitive syllabification: Universals and language specific constraints. Journal of Child Language, 23, 487– 514.Google Scholar
Gillis S., & Sandra D. (1998). Children's and adults' syllabification: The influence of spelling. In A. Aksu-Koc (Ed.), Perspectives on language acquisition (pp. 336– 365). Istanbul: Bogazici University Press.
Goslin J., & Frauenfelder U. H. (2001). Theoretical and human syllabification. Language and Speech, 44, 409– 436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper J. B. (1972). The syllable in phonological theory. Language, 48, 525– 540.Google Scholar
Kahn D. (1980). Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology. New York: Garland.
Kolinsky R. (1998). Spoken word recognition: A stage-processing approach to language differences. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 1– 40.Google Scholar
Laporte E. (1993). Phonetic syllables in French: Combinations, structure, and formal definitions. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 41, 175– 189.Google Scholar
Levelt W. J. M., & Wheeldon L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239– 269.Google Scholar
Liberman I. Y., Shankweiler D., Fischer F. W., & Carter B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201– 212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Martens E., Daelemans W., Gillis S., & Taelman H. (2002). Where do syllables come from? In W. Gray & C. Schunn (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 637– 664). Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
McMurray B., Tanenhaus M. K., Aslin R. N., & Spivey M. J. (2003). Probabilistic constraint satisfaction at the lexical/phonetic interface: Evidence for gradient effects of within-category VOT on lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 77– 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehler J., Dommergues J. Y., Frauenfelder U. H., & Segui J. (1981). The syllable's role in speech segmentation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 298– 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muneaux M., & Ziegler J. C. (2004). Locus of orthographic effects in spoken word recognition: Novel insights from the neighbour generation task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 641– 660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi T., Dilley L. C., Jusczyk A. M., Stattuck-Hufnagel S., & Jusczyk P. W. (2005). English-learning infants' segmentation of verbs in fluent speech. Language and Speech, 48, 279– 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazzi T., Iakimova G., Bertoncini J., Frédonie S., & Alcantara C. (2006). Early segmentation of fluent speech by infants acquiring French: Emerging evidence for crosslinguistic differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 283– 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New B., Pallier C., Ferrand L., & Matos R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L'Année Psychologique, 101, 447– 462.Google Scholar
Nguyen N., & Hawkins S. (2003). Temporal integration in the perception of speech: Introduction. Journal of Phonetics, 31, 279– 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulgram E. (1970). Syllable, word, nexus, cursus. The Hague: Mouton.
Ramus F., Nespor M., & Mehler J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265– 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure F. de. (1916). Cours de linguistique genérale. Lausanne: Payot.
Sebastiàn-Gallés N., Dupoux E., Segui J., & Mehler J. (1992). Contrasting syllabic effects in Catalan and Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 18– 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segui J., Dupoux E., & Mehler J. (1990). The role of the syllable in speech segmentation, phoneme identification, and lexical access. In G. T. M. Altmann (Ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistics and computational perspectives (pp. 263– 280). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Selkirk E. O. (1982). The syllable. In H. Van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The structure of phonological representations (Part II, pp. 337– 383). Dordrecht: Foris.
Spinelli E., McQueen J. M., & Cutler A. (2003). Processing resyllabified words in French. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 233– 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titone D., & Connine C. M. (1997). Syllabification strategies in spoken word processing: Evidence from phonological priming. Psychological Research, 60, 251– 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman R., Bowey J. A., & Bourassa D. (2002). Segmentation of spoken words into syllables by English-speaking children as compared to adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 213– 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman R., & Cassar M. (1997). Can children and adults focus on sound as opposed to spelling in a phoneme counting task? Developmental Psychology, 33, 771– 780.Google Scholar
Treiman R., & Danis C. (1988). Syllabification of intervocalic consonants. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 87– 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treiman R., Gross J., & Cwikiel-Glavin A. (1992). The syllabification of /s/ clusters in English. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 383– 402.Google Scholar
Treiman R., & Zukowski A. (1990). Toward an understanding of English syllabification. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 66– 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann T. (1988). Preference laws for syllable structure and the explanation of sound change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zamuner T. S., & Ohala D. K. (1999). Preliterate children's syllabification of intervocalic consonants. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston University.