Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-wxvwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-14T04:14:46.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pure elderly suicide rates versus combined pure elderly suicide, accidental and undetermined death rates: methodological issues in cross-national studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2007

Ajit Shah*
Affiliation:
Professor of Ageing, Ethnicity and Mental Health, University of Central Lancashire, U.K. and Consultant Psychiatrist, West London Mental Health NHS Trust, London, U.K. Email: ajit.shah@wlmht.nhs.uk

Extract

The verdict of suicide depends upon local legal definitions, culture, and reporting practices and procedures (Shah and Ganesvaran, 1994). Legal definitions of suicide vary across countries. In Austria, officers of the Federal Statistics Division may count a death as suicide if it is suspected as such, even without legal evidence. In Luxembourg, a suicide note is required for a verdict of suicide. In the U.K. and Australia, the verdict of suicide is reached by the coroner, who must be satisfied that suicide has been proved beyond reasonable doubt; if there is reasonable doubt, then a verdict of undetermined death or an open verdict is returned. Owing to the possibility of some probable suicides being misclassified as accidental and undetermined deaths (Chishti et al., 2003), it has been suggested that accidental and undetermined deaths should also be utilized in suicide research (O'Donnell and Farmer, 1995). However, there is evidence from European Union countries that misclassification contributes to only a minor proportion of the variation in general population suicide rates (Chishti et al., 2003), although this has not been specifically examined for elderly suicide rates.

Information

Type
LETTERS
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2007
Supplementary material: File

Shah supplementary material

Shah supplementary material

Download Shah supplementary material(File)
File 24.6 KB