Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T11:03:14.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physical properties, crystalline textures and c-axis fabrics of the Siple Dome (Antarctica) ice core

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Anthony J. Gow
Affiliation:
US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, 72 Lyme Road, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-1290,USA
Debra Meese
Affiliation:
US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, 72 Lyme Road, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-1290,USA Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, 303 Bryand Global Sciences Center, Orono, Maine 04469-5790,USA E-mail: debra.meese@maine.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The quality of the ice core from Siple Dome, West Antarctica, varied widely, with significant fracturing below 400 m. Bubbly ice persisted to the ice–rock interface at 1004 m and constituted the brittle zone. The core has undergone minimal relaxation and has remained brittle and prone to fracturing more than 5 years after it was drilled. This behavior is attributed to unrelieved stresses from Kamb and Bindschadler Ice Streams (former Ice Streams C and D) flanking the dome. Melt layers were identified sporadically throughout the core, as were inclined layers tilted at angles that occasionally exceeded 10°. Structurally, the ice was characterized by extensive recrystallization including grain-size changes from 0.074 cm2 at 59 m to >50 cm2 at 992 m, and major transitions in c-axis fabrics. Unusual fabrics included vertical c-axis clusters superimposed on vertical girdles that may reflect vertical compression acting in conjunction with horizontal tension. The sudden appearance of a shear-type fabric at 700–800 m appears closely linked to the occurrence of abundant tephra particles embedded in the ice. The occurrence of dispersed sediment in the bottom 2 m is attributed to freeze-on of basal meltwater.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2007 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location map of Siple Dome and environs (modified from Alley and Whillans, 1991).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Plot of density measurements vs depth in cores from Siple Dome. Densities measured on freshly drilled core from just below the firn–ice transition to 702 m are indicated by solid circles. Below 702 m the ice was too brittle to process on site. These densities, indicated by filled squares, were based in part on measurements of slightly relaxed ice samples in conjunction with extrapolation of the density profile from above 702 m. All densities were corrected for in situ temperature measured in the drillhole by Engelhardt (2004). Inset diagram includes a complete density profile together with ice overburden and temperature profiles at Siple Dome.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Air-bubble change with increasing depth of burial in Siple Dome ice cores. Note rapid transition from largely tubular bubbles just below pore close-off at 59 m to substantially spherical bubbles between 104 and 140 m. Bubble sections from 205 to 507 m were obtained from samples that had undergone minimal relaxation. Bubbles persisted to the bed at Siple Dome accompanied by odd-shaped inclusions attributed to gas hydrate dissociation in slightly relaxed ice core in samples from 605 and 988 m. Smallest scale subdivisions measure 1 mm.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Relaxation characteristics (density change with time) of Siple Dome ice cores. Repeat measurements made on the Siple Dome core samples 5 years after they were drilled are compared with results obtained on samples of the Byrd core 16 and 27 months following recovery of the core. Despite the highly brittle nature of the Siple Dome core, it has undergone significantly less relaxation than the Byrd core for reasons explained in the text.

Figure 4

Table 1. Relaxation characteristics of Siple Dome hot-water cores (from Gow and Engelhardt, 2000). In situ density values were calculated on the basis of a bubble close-off porosity of 0.098 at 50 m depth and equalization of the entrapped air bubble and the absolute overburden pressures at 300m

Figure 5

Fig. 5. (a) Mean crystal size (cross-sectional area) vs depth at Siple Dome. Data are plotted on a logarithmic scale to accommodate the very large range of crystal sizes measured. Comparisons with datasets from the Summit hot-water core drilled in close proximity to the PICO drilled Siple Dome core and from the Byrd core are included. The largest crystal at any particular depth in the Summit core is indicated by an arrow at the end of the solid line. The termination of a dotted line in the deepest part of the PICO core designates the largest crystal measured, but with its grain boundaries only partially contained within the thin section. (b) Expanded plot of crystal size data (linear scale) for the top 250 m at Siple Dome.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Thin sections photographed between crossed polarizers, and their corresponding point scatter c-axis fabrics from representative depths in the Siple Dome ice core. Smallest subdivisions in scales in the top right corner of each thin-section photograph measure 1 mm.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Lithic fragment, oriented in the horizontal plane, located near the top of debris-bearing ice 2m above bedrock at Siple Dome. Smallest scale subdivisions measure 1 mm.

Figure 8

Fig. 8 Nature of debris entrainment in ice in cores from the bottommost ice at Siple Dome. Characteristic features included layers of dispersed debris between layers of debris-free ice (a, b) and a sustained sequence of debris-bearing ice (c). Smallest scale subdivisions measure 1 m.

Figure 9

Table 2. Siple Dome basal ice samples