Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:53:48.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Overcoming fatigue through compression for advanced elastocaloric cooling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2018

Huilong Hou
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Maryland, USA; hhou@umd.edu
Jun Cui
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, and Ames Laboratory, USA; cuijun@iastate.edu
Suxin Qian
Affiliation:
Department of Refrigeration and Cryogenic Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, China; qiansuxin@mail.xjtu.edu.cn
David Catalini
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, USA; catalini@umd.edu
Yunho Hwang
Affiliation:
Center for Environmental Energy Engineering, University of Maryland, USA; yhhwang@umd.edu
Reinhard Radermacher
Affiliation:
Center for Environmental Energy Engineering, University of Maryland, USA; raderm@umd.edu
Ichiro Takeuchi
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, USA; takeuchi@umd.edu

Abstract

Elastocaloric materials exhibit extraordinary cooling potential, but the repetition of cyclic mechanical loadings during long-term operation of cooling systems requires the refrigerant material to have long fatigue life. This article reviews the fundamental cause of fatigue from aspects of initiation and propagation of fatigue cracks in shape-memory alloys (SMAs) that are used as elastocaloric materials, and highlights recent advances in using compression to overcome fatigue by curtailing the generation of surfaces associated with crack propagation. Compression is identified as a key means to extend fatigue lifetime in engineering design of elastocaloric cooling drive mechanisms. We summarize the state-of-the-art performance of different SMAs as elastocaloric materials and discuss the influence of low cyclic strains and high resistance to transformation. We present integration of compression-based material assemblies into a cooling system prototype and optimization of the system efficiency using work recovery and related measures.

Information

Type
Caloric Effects in Ferroic Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Mechanisms of crack propagation. Schematic of crack advancing under (a) tensile and (b) compressive cycles with stress amplitude Δσ. Adapted with permission from Reference 13. © 2007 Elsevier.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Tension–compression asymmetry in shape-memory alloys. (a) Schematic showing transformation parameters of favorably oriented martensite in stress-induced martensitic transformation. Reproduced with permission from Reference 16. © 1999 Elsevier. (b) Superelastic stress–strain curves obtained for polycrystalline Ni-Ti when applying tensile and compressive stress within the austenite state.5

Figure 2

Figure 3. Compression-based design of Ni-Ti materials for elastocaloric systems. (a) Geometry of Ni-Ti tubes and a stack of multiple tubes and (b) assembly of a bundle of Ni-Ti tubes into a holder to prevent buckling.22,23 (c) Schematic of Ni-Ti bundles and loading heads. The heat exchange fluid is made to flow through the tubes for heat transfer.9 (d) Picture of final assembly of the loading heads and Ni-Ti bundles in a linearly aligned configuration for an elastocaloric system.22

Figure 3

Figure 4. Concept of work recovery, and the implemented work-recovery design in an elastocaloric system. (a) Schematic of the typical superelastic behavior in shape-memory alloys (SMAs).7 (b) Concept of work recovery achieved by linearly stacking two SMA tube bundles.9 The double arrows above the movable frame signify the axis of movement. (c) Compressive stress–strain curves of the two SMA tube bundles in a prototype system to incorporate work recovery. The bottom x-axis has increasing values and the top x-axis has decreasing values.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Evolution of elastocaloric cooling performance of different materials over cycles of operation. Absolute value of cooling ∆T versus cycles in different classes of shape-memory alloys. Unfilled symbols are for tensile mode, and solid symbols are for compressive mode. A crossmark indicates the cycle where failure took place, while no crossmark means there was no failure at the end of cycling. The test temperature, Ttest, and the strain amplitude, Δε, of each material are displayed in the legend.6,26–31