Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:38:51.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differentiation of Solenopsis invicta social forms using high resolution melt PCR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2011

J. Oakey*
Affiliation:
Biosecurity Sciences Laboratory, Biosecurity Queensland, Health & Food Science Precinct, PO Box 156, Archerfield BC, QLD 4108, Australia
E. Harris
Affiliation:
Biosecurity Sciences Laboratory, Biosecurity Queensland, Health & Food Science Precinct, PO Box 156, Archerfield BC, QLD 4108, Australia
B. Pease
Affiliation:
Biosecurity Sciences Laboratory, Biosecurity Queensland, Health & Food Science Precinct, PO Box 156, Archerfield BC, QLD 4108, Australia
C. Jennings
Affiliation:
Biosecurity Queensland Control Centre, PO Box 1241, Oxley, QLD 4075, Australia
K. McCubbin
Affiliation:
Former address: Biosecurity Queensland Control Centre, PO Box 1241, Oxley, QLD 4075, Australia
*
*Authors for correspondence Fax: ++61 (0) 7 3216 6620 E-mail: jane.oakey@deedi.qld.gov.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Solenopsis invicta Buren (red imported fire ant) are invasive pests that have the capability of major destructive impacts on lifestyle, ecology and economy. Control of this species is dependent, in part, upon ability to estimate the potential spread from newly discovered nests. The potential for spread and the spread characteristics differ between monogyne and polygyne social forms. Prior to this study, differentiation of the two social forms in laboratory test samples commonly used a method involving restriction endonuclease digestion of an amplified Gp-9 fragment. Success of this assay is limited by the quality of DNA, which in the field-collected insects may be affected by temporary storage in unfavourable conditions. Here, we describe an alternative and highly objective assay based upon a high resolution melt technique following preamplification of a significantly shorter Gp-9 fragment than that required for restriction endonuclease digestion. We demonstrate the application of this assay to a S. invicta incursion in Queensland, Australia, using field samples from which DNA may be partially degraded. The reductions in hands-on requirements and overall duration of the assay underpin its suitability for high-throughput testing.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Graphical representations of high resolution melt data for five reference S. invicta samples. Samples 1 and 5 represent polygyne (Bb) colonies and samples 2, 3 and 4 represent BB monogyne colonies.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. dF/dT data for HRM using five control S. invicta samples.

Figure 2

Table 1. Autocalled and observed HRM results compared with PCR-RFLP (Krieger & Ross, 2002) for 45 samples of S. invicta from SE Queensland.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Agarose (4%) gel electrophoresis of BsaA1 digested 390 bp amplicons from representative sample of RIFA genotypes. Lanes 1 and 8, 50 bp DNA ladder (MBI Fermentas); lane 2, sample #1, polygyne, heterozygote, restriction fragments 200, 189, 117 and 72 bp; lane 3, sample #2, monogyne, BB homozygote, restriction fragments 200 and 189 bp; lane 4, sample #3, monogyne, BB homozygote, restriction fragments 200 and 189 bp; lane 5, individual RIFA from polygyne colony #2003, bb homozygote, restriction fragments 200, 117 and 72 bp; lane 6, sample #4, monogyne, BB homozygote, restriction fragments 200 and 189 bp; lane 7, sample #5, polygyne, heterozygote B>b, restriction fragments 200, 189, 117 and 72 bp. Depicted are faint remnant undigested amplicons (390 bp), faint primer polymerisation (50–55 bp), duplexes of 200 and 189 bp (B allele), and further digestion of the 189 bp fragment into 117 and 72 bp (b allele).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Variation within ten individual worker genotypes in polygyne colonies.HRM melt curves (left) and dF/dT (right) indicate the proportions of BB homozygotes, bb homozygotes and Bb heterozygotes in four polygyne colonies.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. HRM fragment sequence of two monogyne colony and four polygyne colonies from SE Queensland compared to published Gp-9 sequences (Krieger & Ross, 2002). *, SNP at location 1334 of AF427903; underlined sequence depicts restriction site BsaAI (b allele sequences only). R, A/G double peak.