Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:04:11.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding the relationship between Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 material properties and device performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2014

Talia Gershon*
Affiliation:
IBM TJ Watson Research Center, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
Tayfun Gokmen
Affiliation:
IBM TJ Watson Research Center, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
Oki Gunawan
Affiliation:
IBM TJ Watson Research Center, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
Richard Haight
Affiliation:
IBM TJ Watson Research Center, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
Supratik Guha
Affiliation:
IBM TJ Watson Research Center, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
Byungha Shin
Affiliation:
KAIST Department of Materials Science, Munji-ro 14, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, South Korea
*
Address all correspondence to Talia Gershon at tsgersho@us.ibm.com

Abstract

Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) photovoltaics (PV) have long been considered promising candidates for large-scale PV deployment due to the availability of constituent elements and steady improvements in device efficiency over time. The key limitation to high efficiency in this technology remains a deficit in the open-circuit voltage with respect to the band gap. The past decade has seen significant progress toward understanding how the various material properties such as bulk and surface composition, point defects (intrinsic and extrinsic), and grain boundaries all impact the optoelectronic properties of CZTSSe materials, and consequently device performance. This paper aims to summarize what is known about the CZTSSe bulk and surfaces, and how these material properties may be related to the Voc deficit.

Information

Type
Prospective Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) The calculated stable region of the phase diagram for CZTSe as a function of zinc and tin chemical potentials (fixed copper chemical potential). (b) The calculated formation energies of various point defects and defect complexes in CZTSe as a function of chemical potential (specified in (a), p-type conditions were assumed). (c) The ionization energies of various point defects in the band gap of CZTSe, where red lines represent acceptors, blue lines represent donors, and the initial and final charge states are indicated in parentheses. (d) Calculated band gap shifts induced by various defect clusters in CZTSe, where red and green lines indicate the valence and conduction bands, respectively. Reproduced with permission.[14]

Figure 1

Figure 2. Internal quantum efficiency measurements overlaid with PL spectra from (a) high-efficiency CIGSSe (Eg = 1.19 eV) and (b) CZTSSe (Eg = 1.13 eV). (c) schematic of band gap fluctuations and electrostatic potential fluctuations, both of which could give rise to band tailing in the absorber. Reproduced with permission.[26]

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) Increase in activation energy of the acceptor level and simultaneous decrease in the dielectric constant in CZTSSe as the band gap of the absorber (i.e., sulfur content) increases. Reprinted with permission.[35] (b) Increase in the Voc deficit as the band gap of the absorber (i.e., sulfur content) increases. Reproduced with permission.[26]

Figure 3

Figure 4. Minority carrier diffusion lengths in CZTSSe and CIGSSe materials of varying band gaps. The shaded region is a guide for the eye. Sample Z0 is a recent pure-selenide CZTSe sample, prepared by co-evaporation,[2] whereas the rest of the samples were reported in Ref. 38. Reprinted with permission.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Defect formation energies on the (112) (top) and (112) (bottom) as a function of chemical potential (i.e., Cu rich, poor and Zn rich, poor). Reprinted with permission from Peng et al..[46] Copyright (2013) by the American Physical Society.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Femtosecond UPS spectra of air-annealed CZTSSe under equilibrium (unpumped, black) and flat band (pumped, red) conditions. The arrows indicate the shift of the spectrum following photoexcitation. The bands bend upwards, indicating a condition of accumulation at the surface. Reproduced with permission.[44]

Figure 6

Figure 7. SEM cross-sectional images of CZTS thin films where (a) 0 nm, (b) 1 nm, (c) 4.5 nm, and (d) 23 nm of NaF was evaporated onto the substrate prior to CZTS growth and annealing. (e) SIMS depth profile of zinc distribution in the samples in (a-d). (f) Integrated PL intensity of the samples in (a–d) as a function of temperature. Reproduced with permission.[64]

Figure 7

Figure 8. (a) Calculated dependence of the band gap of CZTSe as a function of Ge (top) and Si (bottom) substitution for Sn. (b) Predicted conduction and valence band positions of CZSiSe and CZGeSe, compared to CZTSe. (a) and (b) are reprinted with permission from Shu et al..[74] Copyright (2013) by the American Physical Society. (c) Experimental observation of band gap changes in CZTS as Ge is increasingly substituted for Sn. Reproduced with permission.[75]

Figure 8

Figure 9. (top) Variation in “Q” (defined as an ordering parameter) for CZTS films annealed at different temperatures, for different durations. (bottom) Full-width at half maximum of the main Raman mode in CZTS samples annealed for 1 h at various temperatures. Shaded region indicates an “order/disorder” temperature. Reproduced with permission.[79]