Introduction
The kesterite compound Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 (CZTSSe) has attracted widespread interest for many years due to its optimal band gap (1.0–1.5 eV, depending on the chalcogen composition), the earth-abundance of its constituent elements, and the hope that it may one day replace Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) as a scalable commercial thin-film photovoltaic (PV) absorber material. Efficiencies have risen steadily to a certified champion value of 12.6% for the mixed sulfoselenide,[Reference Wang, Winkler, Gunawan, Gokmen, Todorov, Zhu and Mitzi1] with demonstrated Jsc values reaching over 80% of the theoretical maximum. Meanwhile, the pure-selenide and pure-sulfide kesterites have reached record efficiencies of 11.6[Reference Lee, Gershon, Gunawan, Todorov, Shin, Virgus and Guha2] and 9.2%,[Reference Kato, Hiroi, Sakai, Muraoka and Sugimoto3] respectively. However, the performance of CZTSSe devices still trails that of CIGS, largely due to a deficit in the open-circuit voltage (V oc), which also limits the fill factor.[Reference Mitzi, Gunawan, Todorov and Barkhouse4] There have been numerous hypotheses for what is presently limiting the device V oc. These can be grouped into three broad categories: a non-Ohmic back contact, a high degree of disorder and/or compensating defects in the CZTSSe bulk, and a poorly optimized interface with the buffer layer.
The current champion CZTSSe device architecture is largely borrowed from CIGS technology, where a soda-lime glass substrate, Mo bottom contact, CdS buffer layer, and ZnO/ITO bilayer electrode have been found to yield the highest performance.[Reference Wang, Winkler, Gunawan, Gokmen, Todorov, Zhu and Mitzi1] The full device stack is thus: glass/Mo/CZTSSe/CdS/ZnO/ITO. We note that in high-efficiency CZTSSe devices, an interfacial Mo(S,Se)2 layer is always present between the Mo and the CZTSSe. This interfacial layer is believed to be important for film adhesion and also for ensuring Ohmic contact with CIGS.[Reference Kohara, Nishiwaki, Hashimoto, Negami and Wada5, Reference Abou-Ras, Kostorz, Bremaud, Kälin, Kurdesau, Tiwari and Döbeli6] However, it may not be true that this contact is Ohmic for all CZTSSe materials. In some cases, when CZTSSe device efficiency is low, devices display low fill factor values and high series resistance. Using a recently developed technique involving monochromatic high-intensity Suns-V oc measurements, it has been shown that a non-Ohmic barrier at the back contact opposing the main PV junction is present in these low FF devices, which also reduces the V oc at 1 sun.[Reference Gunawan, Gokmen and Mitzi7] This Schottky behavior at the back contact is associated with a low-carrier density in the CZTSSe layer or possibly secondary phases at the back interface. However, this detrimental effect is negligible in high-efficiency CZTSSe devices,[Reference Gunawan, Gokmen and Mitzi7] where the back contact is found to be Ohmic.
Although alternative buffer layers have been explored,[Reference Barkhouse, Haight, Sakai, Hiroi, Sugimoto and Mitzi8–Reference Sakai, Hiroi and Sugimoto10] a CdS buffer, prepared by chemical bath deposition, has still been found to produce the best device results. In studying the band alignment at the CZTSSe/CdS interface, a conduction band spike, or an energetic offset in which the conduction band of the CdS is positioned closer to the vacuum level than that in CZTSSe, has been found between the two materials with a height of ~0.41–0.48 eV.[Reference Haight, Barkhouse, Gunawan, Shin, Copel, Hopstaken and Mitzi11] A small conduction band spike can be beneficial to performance in that it helps suppress interfacial recombination; however, a large spike can be detrimental as it would create too large a barrier to electron flow from CZTSSe to the buffer; a 0.4 eV spike is believed to be acceptable for performance.[Reference Nelson12] Alternative buffers such as In2S3 (also prepared by chemical bath deposition) have been identified as promising alternatives to CdS, with conduction band spikes of ~0.15 eV.[Reference Barkhouse, Haight, Sakai, Hiroi, Sugimoto and Mitzi8] In contrast, ZnO is found to have a cliff-like band offset wherein the conduction band of ZnO is energetically positioned further from the vacuum level than that in CZTSSe, leading to severe interfacial recombination and poor performance.[Reference Barkhouse, Haight, Sakai, Hiroi, Sugimoto and Mitzi8] ZnS has too-large a conduction band spike, and carrier transport across the interface is inhibited.[Reference Barkhouse, Haight, Sakai, Hiroi, Sugimoto and Mitzi8] Recent results suggest that a combined CdS/In2S3 buffer may offer yet further benefits for device performance.[Reference Kim, Hiroi, Todorov, Gunawan, Kuwahara, Gokmen, Nair, Hopstaken, Shin, Lee, Wang, Sugimoto and Mitzi13] The In2S3 component is believed to dope CZTSSe near the interface, improving the hole concentration and the quality of the junction and allowing the device characteristics such as the Suns-V oc and temperature-dependent V oc to more closely resemble those of CIGS. The efficiency of devices with this double-buffer was reported as 12.7% as measured internally, and 12.3% externally certified. It may be possible to achieve some further improvements by tuning the interface between CZTSSe and the buffer layer in this manner; however, to date the highest efficiencies are still achieved using a CdS-based buffer. The buffer layer, and the CZTSSe surface it mates with, will be discussed further at a later section of the manuscript.
This leaves us to focus predominantly on the CZTSSe bulk and interface and what is known regarding the relationship between CZTSSe material properties and device performance. Although the pentenary CZTSSe system is complex, there has been some progress toward understanding how the composition, phase diagram, microstructure, and point defect concentrations collectively interact to dictate the optoelectronic properties of CZTSSe thin films, single-crystal materials, internal surfaces, and ultimately device performance. Much of our current understanding of the material properties of CZTSSe stemmed from the early empirical observations that copper-poor, zinc-rich, and small-band gap (i.e., high selenium) compositions are optimal for performance.[Reference Mitzi, Gunawan, Todorov and Barkhouse4, Reference Chen, Walsh, Gong and Wei14] Additionally, it has been known from an early stage that the presence of alkali species (e.g., Na and K) is beneficial to device operation. Building upon these empirical observations, extensive theoretical modeling and targeted experimental studies have further elucidated the reasons why device efficiencies improve under the above compositional conditions, which will be discussed throughout the present work.
This paper aims to summarize the current understanding of how various parameters, including bulk and surface compositions, point defects (intrinsic and extrinsic), and grain boundaries impact the optoelectronic properties of CZTSSe materials, as well as the performance of resulting devices. Ultimately, it is the hope that improved understanding will lead to enhanced device efficiencies in the future.
Metal ratios and bulk disorder
The highest-efficiency devices in the literature all have in common a zinc-rich and copper-poor (Cu/[Zn + Sn]) ~ 0.80–0.85, Zn/Sn ~1.1–1.2) thin-film stoichiometry.[Reference Katagiri, Jimbo, Tahara, Araki and Oishi15] There have been several hypotheses for why this off-stoichiometry is required for high efficiency. First, the phase diagrams of CZTS and CZTSe indicate a narrow region of phase stability, where slight excesses of Cu, Zn, or Sn result in the co-precipitation of CZTS(e) and its secondary phases such as Cu2S(e), ZnS(e), Cu2SnS(e)3, and others.[Reference Chen, Walsh, Gong and Wei14, Reference Vora, Blackburn, Repins, Beall, To, Pankow, Teeter, Young and Noufi16, Reference Chen, Yang, Gong, Walsh and Wei17] Many of these phases, including Cu2S(e), SnS(e), and Cu2SnS(e)3, are conductive and can shunt the device when present in the film.[Reference Vora, Blackburn, Repins, Beall, To, Pankow, Teeter, Young and Noufi16] Approaching zinc-rich and copper-poor compositions favors the precipitation of wider-E g ZnS(e), which is not expected to trap electrons or holes, at the expense of the more conductive phases, thereby preventing a shunt mechanism. Surprisingly, CZTSe devices appear highly tolerant to the presence of secondary ZnS(e) phases; Vora et al. showed that increasing the Zn/Sn ratio from 1.15 to 2.1 only decreased the efficiency of CZTSe devices from 8.1 to 6.4%.[Reference Vora, Blackburn, Repins, Beall, To, Pankow, Teeter, Young and Noufi16]
First-principles calculations reveal a complicated composition-dependent point defect landscape in CZTS and CZTSe (Fig. 1). Significant disorder of Cu and Zn atoms on the Cu/Zn sublattice is expected for all compositions due to the chemical similarity of these atoms.[Reference Chen, Walsh, Gong and Wei14, Reference Chen, Wang, Walsh, Gong and Wei18] The CuZn point defect would introduce an acceptor level, whereas the ZnCu defect would introduce a donor level; the [CuZn + ZnCu] defect cluster is therefore a compensated defect pair. It is also found that the compensated defect pair [VCu + ZnCu] has relatively low formation energy and is therefore expected to form. Given that CZTS(e) is a p-type semiconductor, a net acceptor density is present amid the high degree of compensation, likely originating from a slight excess of either CuZn or VCu. Experimental reports of the hole density in CZTS, CZTSe, and CZTSSe range from ~1015 to 1020 cm−3, indicating a clear dependence of carrier concentration on sample preparation conditions and composition.[Reference Nagaoka, Miyake, Taniyama, Kakimoto and Yoshino19–Reference Gunawan, Virgus and Tai21]
(a) The calculated stable region of the phase diagram for CZTSe as a function of zinc and tin chemical potentials (fixed copper chemical potential). (b) The calculated formation energies of various point defects and defect complexes in CZTSe as a function of chemical potential (specified in (a), p-type conditions were assumed). (c) The ionization energies of various point defects in the band gap of CZTSe, where red lines represent acceptors, blue lines represent donors, and the initial and final charge states are indicated in parentheses. (d) Calculated band gap shifts induced by various defect clusters in CZTSe, where red and green lines indicate the valence and conduction bands, respectively. Reproduced with permission.[Reference Chen, Walsh, Gong and Wei14]
Experimental studies of the CZTS atomic structure have indeed confirmed the presence of significant atomic disorder in the Cu/Zn sublattice.[Reference Schorr, Hoebler and Tovar22–Reference Schorr and Tovar24] Several studies have reported complete[Reference Schorr, Hoebler and Tovar22] or partial[Reference Schorr and Tovar24] disorder on the Cu/Zn sublattice by applying Rietvield analysis to neutron diffraction data. Another study directly observed regions of local Zn enrichment and Cu depletion via aberration-corrected scanning tunneling electron microscopy, with compositional fluctuations of the order of 1.5–5 nm reported.[Reference Mendis, Shannon, Goodman, Major, Claridge, Halliday and Durose23] Local Zn enrichment inherently implies a local segregation of donor defects, whereas local copper enrichment implies local segregation of acceptors. Thus, assuming these defects are ionized, the density of charged defects in the semiconductor fluctuates along with the compositional fluctuations. These charge fluctuations in turn cause electrostatic potential fluctuations of the conduction and valence bands, in a manner previously described by Shklovskii and Efros.[Reference Shklovskii and Efros25] Thus, compositional fluctuations of this type can cause band tailing in CZTSSe.[Reference Gokmen, Gunawan, Todorov and Mitzi26]
Low-temperature photoluminescence (PL) studies of CZTS materials and devices also support the presence of a large number of compensated donor–acceptor pairs in CZTS, of the order of 1019 cm−3,[Reference Gokmen, Gunawan, Todorov and Mitzi26, Reference Gershon, Shin, Bojarczuk, Gokmen, Lu and Guha27] which is high enough to form electrostatic potential fluctuations.[Reference Gershon, Shin, Bojarczuk, Gokmen, Lu and Guha27, Reference Romero, Du, Teeter, Yan and Al-Jassim28] Higher concentrations of donor–acceptor pairs, as measureable in PL and other studies, are correlated with reductions in V oc and fill factor values in devices.[Reference Gershon, Shin, Gokmen, Lu, Bojarczuk and Guha29] Other room-temperature studies have detected the presence of significant band tailing in CZTSSe, likely caused by disorder, which is again correlated with reductions in the V oc values of CZTSSe devices.[Reference Gokmen, Gunawan, Todorov and Mitzi26, Reference Miller, Warren, Gunawan, Gokmen, Mitzi and Cohen30] These works examined both transient photocapacitance spectra[Reference Miller, Warren, Gunawan, Gokmen, Mitzi and Cohen30] and sub-band gap absorption as measured via device EQE (Fig. 2)[Reference Gokmen, Gunawan, Todorov and Mitzi26] and came to a similar conclusions that the presence of significant disorder in CZTSSe causes measureable band tailing, which in turn has a detrimental impact on V oc. Recent work has even concluded that this band tailing may be severe enough to account for the entire observed V oc deficit in CZTSSe.[Reference Gokmen, Gunawan and Mitzi31]
Internal quantum efficiency measurements overlaid with PL spectra from (a) high-efficiency CIGSSe (E g = 1.19 eV) and (b) CZTSSe (E g = 1.13 eV). (c) schematic of band gap fluctuations and electrostatic potential fluctuations, both of which could give rise to band tailing in the absorber. Reproduced with permission.[Reference Gokmen, Gunawan, Todorov and Mitzi26]
The concentrations of various defect types appear to depend on sample stoichiometry. For example, Nagaoka et al. demonstrated control over the carrier concentration in single crystals of CZTS by changing the Cu:Zn ratio. A reduction of this ratio from 1.82 to 1.55 (i.e., a move toward copper-poor and zinc-rich conditions) led to a reduction in the carrier concentration by approximately one order of magnitude.[Reference Nagaoka, Miyake, Taniyama, Kakimoto and Yoshino19] This appears to indicate a reduced acceptor density under copper-poor conditions. A similar finding has been observed in CZTSSe thin films.[Reference Gunawan, Virgus and Tai21]
Furthermore, composition can also determine the likelihood of forming deep and detrimental defect clusters such as [CuZn + SnZn] and/or [2CuZn + SnZn].[Reference Chen, Wang, Walsh, Gong and Wei18] These are predicted to form more readily under zinc-poor conditions, which may help explain the better results obtained when the CZTSSe is prepared under zinc-rich conditions. Some studies also suggest that copper may preferentially occupy tin lattice sites as the copper content increases[Reference Washio, Nozaki, Fukano, Motohiro, Jimbo and Katagiri32]; the CuSn point defect is expected to contribute to a detrimental deep level in CZTSSe. Thus, the requirement for copper-poor and zinc-rich conditions to achieve high-efficiency CZTSSe devices appears related to the suppression of both undesirable secondary phases and harmful point defects and disorder in CZTS. We note that significant disorder has been observed in CZTSSe for nearly all compositions and preparations methods reported to date. As discussed above, it is likely that the main cause of this disorder is the compensating [CuZn + ZnCu] defect cluster, which is predicted to have low formation energy independent of the composition.[Reference Chen, Walsh, Gong and Wei14]
Sulfur and selenium
The sulfur-to-selenium ratio, or S/(S + Se), determines the band gap of CZTSSe, where the pure sulfide has a band gap of ~1.5 eV and the pure-selenide has a band gap of ~1.0 eV. The CZTSSe materials in the highest-efficiency devices reported to date have a selenium-rich composition and a band gap of ~1.13 eV.[Reference Wang, Winkler, Gunawan, Gokmen, Todorov, Zhu and Mitzi1] This band gap is lower than the 1.34 eV band gap predicted by Shockley–Queisser considerations to produce the highest-efficiency devices under AM 1.5 G illumination.[Reference Shockley and Queisser33, Reference Rau and Werner34] However, the higher-sulfur CZTSSe compounds with more “optimal” band gaps typically display lower efficiencies and worse V oc deficits. There are several likely explanations for the better performance observed from selenide materials.
First-principals calculations predict that both donor and acceptor defects are expected to produce shallower energy levels in the selenide materials, compared with the sulfides.[Reference Chen, Walsh, Gong and Wei14, Reference Chen, Wang, Walsh, Gong and Wei18] Experimental admittance spectroscopy studies have shown that indeed the depth of the acceptor level depends on the sulfur-to-selenium content, with shallower levels observed for selenide materials [Fig. 3(a)].[Reference Gunawan, Gokmen, Warren, Cohen, Todorov, Barkhouse, Bag, Tang, Shin and Mitzi35] Another experimental study found that samples with higher sulfur content displayed not only deeper defects, but also an increase in bulk defect density, resulting in poorer carrier collection and higher rates of recombination.[Reference Duan, Yang, Bob, Hsu, Lei and Yang36] Increasing sulfur content has been experimentally correlated with more severe band tailing in the absorbers and larger V oc deficits in devices [Fig. 3(b)].[Reference Gokmen, Gunawan, Todorov and Mitzi26] These phenomena are likely related in that deeper defects, and/or higher defect densities, are both expected to cause more severe band tailing and performance losses.
(a) Increase in activation energy of the acceptor level and simultaneous decrease in the dielectric constant in CZTSSe as the band gap of the absorber (i.e., sulfur content) increases. Reprinted with permission.[Reference Gunawan, Gokmen, Warren, Cohen, Todorov, Barkhouse, Bag, Tang, Shin and Mitzi35] (b) Increase in the V oc deficit as the band gap of the absorber (i.e., sulfur content) increases. Reproduced with permission.[Reference Gokmen, Gunawan, Todorov and Mitzi26]
Sulfide compounds are also expected to exhibit larger electron effective masses and smaller dielectric constants than the selenides.[Reference Persson37] The reduction in dielectric constant with increasing sulfur has also been observed experimentally [Fig. 3(a)].[Reference Gunawan, Gokmen, Warren, Cohen, Todorov, Barkhouse, Bag, Tang, Shin and Mitzi35] We note that a reduced dielectric constant would amplify all Coulombic (electrostatic) interactions because of reduced screening and hence may partially account for larger activation energies and more severe band tailing for sulfide compounds. The reduced screening of charged point defects in the material would also impact carrier mobility and recombination. This, coupled with a larger electron effective mass,[Reference Persson37] would result in poorer carrier transport through sulfide materials, as compared with selenides. A recent study examined minority carrier diffusion lengths (L d) in CZTSSe materials with varying sulfur to selenium compositions and indeed found that this value decreased with increasing sulfur content (Fig. 4).[Reference Gokmen, Gunawan and Mitzi38]
Minority carrier diffusion lengths in CZTSSe and CIGSSe materials of varying band gaps. The shaded region is a guide for the eye. Sample Z0 is a recent pure-selenide CZTSe sample, prepared by co-evaporation,[Reference Lee, Gershon, Gunawan, Todorov, Shin, Virgus and Guha2] whereas the rest of the samples were reported in Ref. Reference Gokmen, Gunawan and Mitzi38. Reprinted with permission.
Devices with high-sulfur CZTSSe have also been observed to have higher series resistance values than those with higher selenium content,[Reference Gunawan, Gokmen and Mitzi39–Reference Shin, Gunawan, Zhu, Bojarczuk, Chey and Guha41] indicating that sulfur reduces bulk conductivity, mainly due to reduced carrier density[Reference Gunawan, Virgus and Tai21] in the absorber, and makes the back contact less Ohmic. Note that even though a larger band gap tends to increase the V oc and thus the FF (see, e.g., empirical relationship of V oc and FF in Ref. Reference Green42) the monotonic increase in series resistance at higher band gap eventually degrades the FF, resulting in a maximum FF value when the CZTSSe band gaps is ~1.15 eV. This band-gap-dependent FF profile leads to the observed empirical optimum efficiency at ~1.15 eV.[Reference Wang, Winkler, Gunawan, Gokmen, Todorov, Zhu and Mitzi1, Reference Todorov, Tang, Bag, Gunawan, Gokmen, Zhu and Mitzi43]
Finally, both sulfur and selenium are volatile at temperatures commonly used to prepare CZTSSe absorbers, with sulfur being the more volatile of the two chalcogen species. In many chalcogenide materials, chalcogen deficiency results in deep states, which are harmful to performance. Based simply on the higher vapor pressure of sulfur compared with selenium, one might expect that sulfur deficiency would be more difficult to avoid than selenium deficiency. Additionally, first-principles calculations suggest that sulfur vacancies have lower formation energies than selenium vacancies.[Reference Chen, Walsh, Gong and Wei14] Thus, high-sulfur CZTSSe materials are expected to suffer more from the presence of deep recombination centers than are high-selenium materials.
Surface structure
Studies of the CZTSSe surface employing x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and other surface-sensitive techniques have found it to be highly depleted of copper, with respect to the bulk.[Reference Haight, Shao, Wang and Mitzi44, Reference Bär, Schubert, Marsen, Krause, Pookpanratana, Unold, Weinhardt, Heske and Schock45] First-principles calculations find that charge-compensated point defects such as vacancies (VCu, VZn), antisites (ZnCu, ZnSn, SnZn), and defect clusters (CuZn + CuSn, 2ZnCu + VSn) are required to stabilize the polar (112) surface, which is the preferred orientation of CZTSSe[Reference Xu, Chen, Huang, Xiang, Gong and Wei46] (Fig. 5). In copper-poor, zinc-rich samples, the favored charge-stabilizing defects are those that are free from copper. The most prevalent point defects are predicted to be 2VCu, 2ZnCu + 2VSn and ZnSn. These defects are also found not to contribute harmful states in the band gap. These calculations are consistent with what is experimentally observed of the CZTSSe surface, which indeed displays a copper-depleted character.
Defect formation energies on the (112) (top) and (112) (bottom) as a function of chemical potential (i.e., Cu rich, poor and Zn rich, poor). Reprinted with permission from Peng et al..[Reference Xu, Chen, Huang, Xiang, Gong and Wei46] Copyright (2013) by the American Physical Society.
Copper-depletion of the CuInSe2 (CIS) surface has also been widely reported and studied.[Reference Liao and Rockett47, Reference Schmid, Ruckh, Grunwald and Schock48] In this system, it is also found that charged surface defects stabilize the (112) surface.[Reference Jaffe and Zunger49] It has been reported that the so-called “ordered vacancy compound” (OVC) that spontaneously forms on the CIS surface has a much lower copper concentration (CuIn3Se5), is n-type, has a slightly larger band gap (1.3 eV, compared with 1.04 eV), and is responsible for forming a p–n junction with the CIS layer below.[Reference Schmid, Ruckh, Grunwald and Schock48] Upon deposition of the buffer, the junction becomes CIS/OVC/CdS. Furthermore, Cd may diffuse into the OVC layer thereby further doping it n-type and improving the junction characteristics,[Reference Liao and Rockett50] as cadmium is a known donor defect in CIS.[Reference Migliorato, Shay, Kasper and Wagner51]
An open question is: to what extent does the copper-deficient surface observed in CZTSSe resemble that observed in CIS and CIGS? If Cd inter-diffuses with the CZTSSe surface during chemical bath deposition, which sites does it occupy and what would the junction look like? One study examined these questions using first-principles analysis and found that substitution of cadmium onto Cu and Zn sites is more favorable than on Sn sites,[Reference Maeda, Nakamura and Wada52] where CdCu is a donor defect and CdZn is neutral. More favorable still is the compensated defect complex (CdCu + VCu). This defect pair is expected to dominate in equilibrium, with small amounts of CdCu and CdZn also present. If this were the case, the degree of n-type doping of the copper-poor CZTSSe surface would be limited compared with the CIS case; however, real experimental preparation conditions may not kinetically allow equilibrium to be reached. Non-equilibrium could therefore allow n-type doping of the surface region, in a manner similar to what is observed in CIS. These phenomena warrant further investigation to fully understand this interface and how it evolves during chemical bath deposition of the buffer.
Another notable aspect of the CZTSSe surface is that the CZTSSe bands are found to bend upwards, indicating a condition of accumulation.[Reference Haight, Shao, Wang and Mitzi44] Such upward band bending indicates that excess negative charge is trapped at or near the surface. This was determined using femtosecond pump (1.55 eV photon energy)/probe (26.35 eV) ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (fs-UPS), where spectra are recorded both in equilibrium and flat-band (photoexcited) conditions and the spectra are compared with determine the direction of band bending (Fig. 6). Photoexcitation with an intense pulse of 800 nm light produces a dense electron–hole plasma that flattens the CZTSSe bands near the surface. Under photoexcitation, the bands shift to higher binding energy (red) indicating that under equilibrium the bands are bent up at the surface. An accumulated surface has been noted for CZTSSe samples with or without surface oxide layers removed, indicating a fundamental property of the CZTSSe surface. Haight et al. attribute the accumulation at the surface to the large copper deficiency in this region, where the copper vacancy is expected to act as a shallow acceptor in CZTSSe.
Femtosecond UPS spectra of air-annealed CZTSSe under equilibrium (unpumped, black) and flat band (pumped, red) conditions. The arrows indicate the shift of the spectrum following photoexcitation. The bands bend upwards, indicating a condition of accumulation at the surface. Reproduced with permission.[Reference Haight, Shao, Wang and Mitzi44]
Air annealing of CZTSSe films prior to chemical bath deposition of CdS buffers has been shown to dramatically improve both absorber PL and device performance. Following air anneal, strong sodium and oxygen signals are detected by XPS,[Reference Haight, Shao, Wang and Mitzi44] indicating both the formation of a surface oxide and diffusion of Na to the surface. Even following NH4OH etching to remove oxygen and Na at the surface, secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) reveals that the sodium and oxygen signals are present throughout the CZTSSe film thickness. However, the most likely location for most of the sodium and oxygen species detected is at grain surfaces rather than the grain interior.[Reference Niles, Al-Jassim and Ramanathan53] The presence of sodium and oxygen at the grain surfaces in high-efficiency CIS, CIGS, and CZTSSe has been correlated with high device performance. One explanation for this observed relationship is that Na may aid in the oxidation of grain boundaries, i.e., the filling of chalcogen vacancies with oxygen, which could help passivate deep defects along these boundaries.[Reference Haight, Shao, Wang and Mitzi44, Reference Kronik, Cahen and Schock54] Similar observations on the efficacy of air anneals in CIS-based devices are consistent with our understanding of diffusion of O and Na along grain boundaries and their effect on grain boundary passivation.[Reference Haight, Shao, Wang and Mitzi44, Reference Cahen and Noufi55]
Alkali impurities
Much like in CIGS materials, sodium and other alkali species are found to be important for achieving high-efficiency CZTSSe devices. In particular, sodium is found to increase grain size,[Reference Rockett56, Reference Oo, Johnson, Bhatia, Lund, Nowell and Scarpulla57] increase carrier concentration and/or mobility,[Reference Prabhakar and Jampana58–Reference Nagaoka, Miyake, Taniyama, Kakimoto, Nose, Scarpulla and Yoshino62] passivate deep defects,[Reference Kronik, Cahen and Schock54, Reference Erslev, Lee, Shafarman and Cohen63, Reference Gershon, Shin, Bojarczuk, Hopstaken, Mitzi and Guha64] and improve the fill factors and open-circuit voltages of CZTSSe devices.[Reference Erslev, Lee, Shafarman and Cohen63, Reference Li, Kuciauskas, Young and Repins65, Reference Nakada, Iga, Ohbo and Kunioka66] It has been found that potassium behaves in a manner similar to sodium in CZTS.[Reference Johnson, Baryshev, Thimsen, Manno, Zhang, Veryovkin, Leighton and Aydil67]
Surface compositional studies of high-efficiency CZTSSe absorbers have found that sodium is present in large concentrations at surfaces and grain boundaries in CZTSSe.[Reference Haight, Shao, Wang and Mitzi44, Reference Niles, Al-Jassim and Ramanathan53] First-principles studies suggest while grain boundaries in CIGS are fundamentally electrically benign,[Reference Yan, Jiang, Noufi, Wei, Moutinho and Al-Jassim68] unpassivated grain boundaries in CZTSe contribute deep states which are expected to act as non-radiative recombination centers.[Reference Li, Mitzi and Shenoy69] Kelvin-probe studies have found potential “spikes” at grain boundaries in CZTSSe, which have been proposed to behave as hole-repelling and electron-attracting regions, aiding the separation and transport of the minority electrons.[Reference Li, Chawla and Clemens70] However, these spikes may not exist in materials that do not contain sodium.[Reference Li, Chawla and Clemens70] These results seem to suggest that sodium segregates to grain boundaries, and once there may be important for suppressing non-radiative recombination. This was further supported in a PL study, which examined the total PL intensity in CZTS as a function of sodium, and as a function of temperature.[Reference Gershon, Shin, Bojarczuk, Hopstaken, Mitzi and Guha64] It was found that at all temperatures, samples with less sodium luminesced less than those with more sodium. Furthermore, as the temperature increased from ~4 K toward room temperature, the PL of samples with little or no sodium dropped at a much higher rate than samples with more sodium, indicating that when carriers had enough thermal energy to travel longer distances, they tended to reach non-radiative recombination centers, likely along grain boundaries [Fig. 7(f)]. Once sufficient sodium was present in the films, samples with vastly different grain sizes (and thus boundary densities) displayed identical radiative recombination profiles, indicating that the grain boundaries had become passive within the detection limits of the study.[Reference Gershon, Shin, Bojarczuk, Hopstaken, Mitzi and Guha64]
SEM cross-sectional images of CZTS thin films where (a) 0 nm, (b) 1 nm, (c) 4.5 nm, and (d) 23 nm of NaF was evaporated onto the substrate prior to CZTS growth and annealing. (e) SIMS depth profile of zinc distribution in the samples in (a-d). (f) Integrated PL intensity of the samples in (a–d) as a function of temperature. Reproduced with permission.[Reference Gershon, Shin, Bojarczuk, Hopstaken, Mitzi and Guha64]
In addition to passivating grain boundaries, alkali species significantly improve CZTSSe microstructure by enhancing grain size[Reference Rockett56, Reference Oo, Johnson, Bhatia, Lund, Nowell and Scarpulla57, Reference Gershon, Shin, Bojarczuk, Hopstaken, Mitzi and Guha64, Reference Johnson, Baryshev, Thimsen, Manno, Zhang, Veryovkin, Leighton and Aydil67, Reference Sutter-Fella, Stu"ckelberger, Hagendorfer, La Mattina, Kranz, Nishiwaki, Uhl, Romanyuk and Tiwari:71] [Figs. 7(a)–7(d)]. It is believed that this microstructural improvement is related to the formation of a liquid sodium–chalcogen-based phase at the grain boundaries. Enhanced diffusion through a phase such as this is especially important in zinc-rich and copper-poor materials, where ZnS(e) must be expelled from growing CZTSSe grains and may drag on advancing grain boundaries, prevent grain growth, if not removed from these boundaries.[Reference Gershon, Shin, Bojarczuk, Hopstaken, Mitzi and Guha64, Reference Sutter-Fella, Stu"ckelberger, Hagendorfer, La Mattina, Kranz, Nishiwaki, Uhl, Romanyuk and Tiwari:71] It has been shown that the distribution of zinc throughout CZTS thin films is heavily influenced by the concentration of sodium present in the absorber during the annealing stage [Fig. 7(e)]. A large average grain size in CZTS was correlated with a reduction in zinc content through the film bulk and simultaneously the accumulation of zinc sulfide toward the back interface near the Mo contact. The phase diagram of the Zn–Na–S system indicates a eutectic temperature of roughly 610 °C.[Reference Tomashyk, Feychuk and Shcherbak72] This may help explain why annealing at such high temperatures is required to achieve large grains in CZTSSe.[Reference Shin, Zhu, Bojarczuk, Chey and Guha73] Another study showed that even CZTS films prepared on alkali-free substrates could display these large grain size improvements when soda-lime glass substrates were placed in the same annealing ampoule, implying that alkali species may volatilize out of the glass during the anneal and impact the microstructure.[Reference Johnson, Baryshev, Thimsen, Manno, Zhang, Veryovkin, Leighton and Aydil67]
Sodium may also incorporate directly onto the CZTS lattice. Studies on single-crystals have found an increase in the unit-cell size upon incorporation of sodium as measured by x-ray diffraction,[Reference Nagaoka, Miyake, Taniyama, Kakimoto, Nose, Scarpulla and Yoshino62] indicating the incorporation of sodium into the structure. This finding was also correlated with an increase in both the carrier concentration and mobility of CZTS. The authors attributed this to a reduction in the acceptor activation energy and a reduction in point defect compensation in the CZTS structure. Enhanced fill factors and V oc values of CZTSe devices have been attributed to improvements in carrier concentration and mobility seen upon sodium incorporation into CZTSe.[Reference Li, Kuciauskas, Young and Repins65]
Other substitutional elements in CZTS
Although it is possible to change the band gap in CZTSSe by varying the sulfur to selenium content, it appears that sulfur may have other detrimental impacts on device performance (see above). Other chemical variations to CZTSSe can also induce band gap changes. First-principles calculations find that Ge and Si may be alloyed into the CZTSSe structure, substituting onto the tin site, to increase the band gap [Fig. 8(a)].[Reference Shu, Yang, Chen, Huang, Xiang, Gong and Wei74] It was found that Ge is highly miscible into CZTSe with the Cu2Zn(Ge,Sn)Se4 band gap ranging from 1.0 eV for the pure-tin compound and 1.5 eV for the pure-Ge compound. Band gap tunability has been demonstrated experimentally in the Cu2Zn(Ge,Sn)S4 system, where Ford et al. prepared films with band gaps ranging from 1.5 eV (pure tin Cu2ZnSnS4) to 1.94 eV (pure Ge Cu2ZnGeS4), with various values in between [Fig. 8(c)].[Reference Ford, Guo, Agrawal and Hillhouse75] The magnitude of this shift is consistent with theoretical predictions.[Reference Shu, Yang, Chen, Huang, Xiang, Gong and Wei74] The same group later demonstrated efficiencies as high as 8.4% (without anti-reflection coating) using a partially Ge substituted kesterite material.[Reference Guo, Ford, Yang, Hages, Hillhouse and Agrawal76] In the same year, Bag et al. reported an efficiency of 9.1% by substituting 40% Ge into CZTSe.[Reference Bag, Gunawan, Gokmen, Zhu and Mitzi77] This group demonstrated effective Ge incorporation by monitoring the x-ray diffraction peak, which shifts to larger 2-theta with increasing Ge due to the smaller atomic size of Ge as compared with Sn. Silicon is less miscible in CZTSe, but offers a larger range of band gap tuning up to 2.4 eV for the Cu2ZnSiSe4 compound. In both cases (substitutional Ge or Si), the band gap change is expected to stem largely from a conduction band shift [Fig. 8(b)].
(a) Calculated dependence of the band gap of CZTSe as a function of Ge (top) and Si (bottom) substitution for Sn. (b) Predicted conduction and valence band positions of CZSiSe and CZGeSe, compared to CZTSe. (a) and (b) are reprinted with permission from Shu et al..[Reference Shu, Yang, Chen, Huang, Xiang, Gong and Wei74] Copyright (2013) by the American Physical Society. (c) Experimental observation of band gap changes in CZTS as Ge is increasingly substituted for Sn. Reproduced with permission.[Reference Ford, Guo, Agrawal and Hillhouse75]
Furthermore, it was recently found that compounds in the I2–II–IV–VI4 family are generally stable when I = Cu, Ag, II = Zn, Cd, Hg, IV = Si, Ge, Sn, and VI = S, Se, and/or Te. Instability arises when II = Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, when IV = Ti, Zr, Hf, or when IV = O due to competition from the related binary and ternary compounds.[Reference Wang, Chen, Yang, Lang, Xiang, Gong, Walsh and Wei78] The authors noted that phase separation is expected predominantly when the secondary phases had non-tetrahedral structures. This study opens up many possibilities to find a variant of CZTSSe that may have preferable optoelectronic properties and a lower propensity to self-compensate. Many of the possible substitutions mentioned above have never been reported experimentally, although they are promising materials to study in the future.
Prospectives
Over the past decade, our understanding of the factors impacting the material properties of CZTSSe, and consequently device performance, has improved dramatically. Through careful materials and device characterization, several key phenomena have been identified as likely culprits for the observed V oc deficit in CZTSSe devices. Among these are the severity of the point defects and disorder within the CZTSSe bulk, which exceeds that observed in CIGS materials of the same band gap. It is believed that the higher degree of disorder is due to the chemical similarity of Cu and Zn atoms, and the low energetic barrier to the exchange of lattice positions amongst these two atoms. The disorder on the Cu/Zn sublattice may be responsible for the significant band tailing observed in the CZTSSe system, and therefore at least part of the V oc deficit. It is possible that this disorder could be mitigated by an external stimulus, e.g., strain. Alternatively, recent theoretical calculations have indicated that the CZTSSe structure would be stable to various substitutions on the I, II, IV, and VI sites. By replacing either Cu, Zn, or both, a new I2–II–IV–VI4 compound may be identified that is less susceptible to the kind of disorder that causes detrimental band tailing and thus V oc loss in the CZTSSe system.
Additionally, it has been proposed that disorder in CZTSSe may be reduced through low-temperature annealing for extended periods of time.[Reference Scragg, Choubrac, Lafond, Ericson and Platzer-Björkman79] A recent study documented improvements in an “ordering parameter” of CZTS materials when samples were annealed below ~250 °C, as measured via Raman spectroscopy. It was found that these low-temperature anneals reduced the full-width at half-maximum of the main CZTS Raman peak centered at ~338 cm−1 (Fig. 9). The authors attributed the observed narrowing of the Raman peak to a reduction in the disorder of the bulk CZTS, i.e., fewer Cu–Zn antisites. The effect was found to be reversible, in that the Raman peak width of samples annealed above this temperature widened again, after initially decreasing during the low-temperature anneal. If it is indeed possible to reduce the disorder in CZTS using long low-temperature anneals without otherwise harming other material properties, this could offer a valuable means of reducing the V oc deficit in CZTS devices. To date, there have been no published reports of device improvements using this technique.
(top) Variation in “Q” (defined as an ordering parameter) for CZTS films annealed at different temperatures, for different durations. (bottom) Full-width at half maximum of the main Raman mode in CZTS samples annealed for 1 h at various temperatures. Shaded region indicates an “order/disorder” temperature. Reproduced with permission.[Reference Scragg, Choubrac, Lafond, Ericson and Platzer-Björkman79]
We have also seen experimental and theoretical evidence that moving away from sulfur and toward a pure-selenide material improves the overall bulk properties of the absorber. This observation has recently manifested in a record V oc deficit of 578 mV in a pure-selenide CZTSe device.[Reference Lee, Gershon, Gunawan, Todorov, Shin, Virgus and Guha2] Although there seems to be a limit to the selenium content accessible via solution-processing due to solubility constraints, it is possible to prepare pure-selenide materials using vapor phase methods such as sputtering and co-evaporation. Unfortunately, the band gap of the pure CZTSe material (1.0 eV) is lower than the optimal value for high-efficiency single-absorber devices based on the Shockley–Queisser limit model.[Reference Shockley and Queisser33, Reference Rau and Werner34] If a method is found to increase the band gap of CZTSe without compromising its optoelectronic properties, we could see performance improvements above the 12.6% efficiency benchmark that has already been demonstrated. Alternatively, if methods are found to increase the dielectric constant of the absorber or reduce the electron effective mass, i.e., induce the opposite effect to what is observed with increasing sulfur, then device performance is also expected to increase.
Recent work has offered important insights into the chemical and electronic properties of the CZTSSe surface. Many similarities have been found between the CZTSSe surface and that of CIS; however, the interface chemistry that occurs during junction formation is still not fully understood. Additional work is needed to elucidate what if any losses in performance are caused by an unoptimized interface between CZTSSe and its buffer layer. It has been shown that formation of a double-emitter comprised CdS/In2S3 improves the junction characteristics such that CZTSSe devices behave more like CIGS devices, in terms of temperature-dependent V oc and Suns-V oc. This indicates that the CZTSSe/buffer interface may not yet be fully optimized and that further efficiency improvements may be possible as we learn more about the chemical and electrical properties of the CZTSSe surface and the junctions it forms with buffer materials.
Some optimizations of the device layer thicknesses may also provide additional benefits. The CZTSSe layer in the highest-efficiency CZTSSe devices is typically 2–2.5 µm thick. This layer thickness is typically chosen because the hydrazine solution process used to prepare CZTSSe often results in voids toward the back of the absorber and thus multiple layers and a thick coating appear necessary to prevent detrimental device shunting through pinholes. Recent work has found that the minority carrier diffusion length in our high-efficiency CZTSSe layers (E g ~ 1.15 eV) is closer to ~1.2 µm or less,[Reference Gokmen, Gunawan and Mitzi38] indicating that much of the CZTSSe thickness is inactive and/or possibly contributing to series resistance in the device. An optimized device might therefore employ films with thicknesses closer to the minority carrier diffusion length if methods can be found to suppress void formation toward the back contact and thereby avoid pinholes and shunt paths in the films.
Finally, high-efficiency CIGS devices typically contain a graded band gap structure, where the band gap increases slightly toward the front and back of the absorber layer to minimize recombination. Although this is generally acknowledged to be a promising route toward achieving improved device performance in CZTSSe,[Reference Mitzi, Gunawan, Todorov and Barkhouse4] no experimental studies demonstrating this effect have been reported. As discussed above, surface alloying with Ge, Si, and/or sulfur would allow a slight increase in the band gap at the CZTSSe surface.
Acknowledgments
The information, data, or work presented herein was funded in part by the U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Program, under Award Number DE EE0006334. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.