Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T14:39:38.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kindergarten stressors and cumulative adrenocortical activation: The “first straws” of allostatic load?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2011

Nicole R. Bush*
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco and Berkeley
Jelena Obradović
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Nancy Adler
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco and Berkeley
W. Thomas Boyce
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Nicole Bush, Center for Health and Community at the University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 465, San Francisco, CA 94118; E-mail: BushN@chc.ucsf.edu.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using an ethnically diverse longitudinal sample of 338 kindergarten children, this study examined the effects of cumulative contextual stressors on children's developing hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenocortical (HPA) axis regulation as an early life indicator of allostatic load. Chronic HPA axis regulation was assessed using cumulative, multiday measures of cortisol in both the fall and spring seasons of the kindergarten year. Hierarchical linear regression analyses revealed that contextual stressors related to ethnic minority status, socioeconomic status, and family adversity each uniquely predicted children's daily HPA activity and that some of those associations were curvilinear in conformation. Results showed that the quadratic, U-shaped influences of family socioeconomic status and family adversity operate in different directions to predict children's HPA axis regulation. Results further suggested that these associations differ for White and ethnic minority children. In total, this study revealed that early childhood experiences contribute to shifts in one of the principal neurobiological systems thought to generate allostatic load, confirming the importance of early prevention and intervention efforts. Moreover, findings suggested that analyses of allostatic load and developmental theories accounting for its accrual would benefit from an inclusion of curvilinear associations in tested predictive models.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Table 1. Descriptives for continuous predictors, prior to creating composite scores

Figure 1

Table 2. Correlations among predictors and outcomes

Figure 2

Figure 1. Plots of significant linear and curvilinear regression lines for fall and spring cortisol. Regression slopes are plotted for significant beta coefficients in each model, holding all other variables in the model at mean levels, and plotting across the true sample range for each variable. Socioeconomic status (SES) was reversed for this plot in order to aid comparison with the effects of adversity; values at the right of the x axis represent the lowest SES and highest adversity (or greatest risk). AUC, area under the curve.

Figure 3

Table 3. Regression coefficients for prediction of fall and spring cortisol area under the curve

Figure 4

Table 4. Regression coefficients for prediction of fall and spring cortisol area under the curve by minority status

Figure 5

Figure 2. Bivariate graphs showing linear and curvilinear associations between contextual stressors and fall cortisol by ethnic minority status. See Table 4 for significance levels of plotted linear and curvilinear slopes. Socioeconomic status (SES) was reversed for this plot in order to aid comparison with the effects of adversity; values at the right of the x axis represent the lowest SES and highest adversity (or greatest risk). [A color version of this figure can be viewed online at journals.cambridge.org/dpp]

Figure 6

Figure 3. Bivariate graphs showing linear and curvilinear associations between contextual stressors and spring cortisol by ethnic minority status. See Table 4 for significance levels of plotted linear and curvilinear slopes. Socioeconomic status (SES) was reversed for this plot in order to aid comparison with the effects of adversity; values at the right of the x axis represent the lowest SES and highest adversity (or greatest risk). [A color version of this figure can be viewed online at journals.cambridge.org/dpp]