Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T05:49:22.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Association of perinatal factors and school performance in primary school Chilean children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2013

L. Villarroel
Affiliation:
Division of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
L. Karzulovic
Affiliation:
Division of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
J. Manzi
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
J. G. Eriksson
Affiliation:
Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Unit of General Practice, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland Folkhalsan Research Centre, Helsinki, Finland
F. Mardones*
Affiliation:
Division of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr F. Mardones, Department of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Street Marcoleta 434, 833-0073 Santiago, Chile. (Email mardones@med.puc.cl or fmardons@uc.cl)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The associations between school performance and cognitive abilities with birth characteristics have mostly been studied without taking into consideration the effects of gestational age (GA). Our aim was to study the association between prenatal growth and cognitive function in term-born Chilean school children. A cohort of over 200,000 term-born fourth graders who took the regular national test for school performance was studied. Outcome parameters were language and mathematics test scores in relation to prenatal growth. A total of 256,040 subjects took the test and 220,940 were included in the final study sample. Prenatal growth was modestly, but significantly, associated with school performance. Adjusted β coefficients for 1 cm increase in birth length were 1.28 and 0.77 for mathematics and language, respectively; the corresponding values for 100 g increase in birth weight were 0.59 and 0.34, respectively. Increased GA was associated with lower test scores. Adjusted β coefficients for the birth measurements generally had a lower strength of association than those of socio-economic factors. However, the confounders most strongly associated with educational achievements were socio-economic factors, known to be associated with birth size. Lower socio-economic status is known to negatively influence both prenatal growth and cognitive function, supporting the overall importance of prenatal growth in relation to cognitive outcomes.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1 Exclusion criteria applied to 256,040 Chilean children attending fourth grade and taking SIMCE in 2006 (equivalent to 95% out of a total estimated of 269,500)

Figure 1

Table 2 Characteristics of 220,940 Chilean children born at term participating in the study

Figure 2

Table 3 Linear regression models showing relationship of BW, BL and GA with achievement in language test: unadjusted and adjusted for gender, maternal education, maternal age at childbirth, age of children at the time of examination, GA (37–41 weeks), type of school (private, private subsidized or public), birth order and location of school

Figure 3

Table 4 Linear regression models showing relationship of BW, BL and GA with achievement in mathematics test: unadjusted and adjusted for gender, maternal education, maternal age at childbirth, age of children at the time of examination, GA (37–41 weeks), type of school (private, private subsidized or public), birth order and location of school

Figure 4

Table 5 Multiple linear regression model of BL for language and mathematics scores: values of all confounders*

Figure 5

Table 6 Comparison of adjusted mean differences for language and mathematics tests in dichotomic groups of children with different BW and BL values*