Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T00:24:52.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sensitivity cycling to physical dormancy break and seed vigour of two Ipomoea species (Convolvulaceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

K.M.G. Gehan Jayasuriya
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY40506, USA
Jerry M. Baskin
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY40506, USA
Dennis M. Tekrony
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY40546, USA
Carol C. Baskin*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY40506, USA Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY40546, USA
*
*Correspondence Fax: +1-859-257-1717 Email: ccbask0@email.uky.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The physically dormant seeds of Ipomoea lacunosa and of I. hederacea undergo sensitivity cycling (insensitive ↔  sensitive) to dormancy-breaking treatment. Sensitivity cycling is important to seeds with physical dormancy in sensing appropriate environmental conditions for germination. Seed vigour is also important to seedling establishment, but no study has compared changes in vigour (or not) with changes in sensitivity. This study was conducted to determine the relationship between sensitivity cycling and seed vigour in I. lacunosa and I. hederacea. The seed moisture contents of insensitive and sensitive seeds of I. lacunosa and of sensitive seeds of I. hederacea were measured, and several vigour tests were performed. Vigour of sensitive seeds of I. lacunosa decreased more rapidly than that of insensitive seeds. No significant change in vigour was observed in either permeable or impermeable seeds of I. hederacea. We conclude that sensitivity cycling to physical dormancy break is important in maintaining vigour of I. lacunosa seeds in the soil seed-bank.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
Figure 0

Figure 1 Flow diagram for the different pretreatments used for Ipomoea lacunosa seeds.

Figure 1

Table 1 Different pretreatments used for I. lacunosa and I. hederacea seeds

Figure 2

Figure 2 Moisture content (fresh mass basis) of I. hederacea (A) and of I. lacunosa (B) seeds. Bars are+1 SE. Different upper-case letters show significant differences between seed pretreatments in the 2006C1 collection, and different lower-case letters show significant differences between seed pretreatments in the 2006C2 collection. Interaction between seed lot and seed pretreatment is not statistically significant. See Table 1 for definitions of abbreviations. Figure shows the raw data, but statistics were done on arc-sine transformed data. The experiment was not performed on IIN treatment of the I. lacunosa 2006C1 seed collection. All of this information also applies to Figs 3–6.

Figure 3

Figure 3 Germination at 30/20°C following accelerated ageing of I. hederacea 2006C1 and 2006C2 (A) and of I. lacunosa 2006C1 and 2006C2 (B) seeds.

Figure 4

Figure 4 Conductivity of leachates of I. hederacea 2006C1 and 2006C2 (A) and of I. lacunosa 2006C1 and 2006C2 (B) seeds at laboratory temperature (22–24°C).

Figure 5

Figure 5 Plumule length of I. hederacea 2006C1 and 2006C2 (A) and of I. lacunosa 2006C1 and 2006C2 (B) seedlings after 5 days of incubation at 30/20°C.

Figure 6

Figure 6 Radicle length of I. hederacea 2006C1 and 2006C2 (A) and of I. lacunosa 2006C1 and 2006C2 (B) seedlings after 5 days of incubation at 30/20°C.

Figure 7

Figure 7 Conceptual model of change in rate of I. lacunosa seed deterioration (vigour loss rate) as influenced by moisture content and level of sensitivity.