Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T01:38:47.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk factors for pharyngocutaneous fistula formation: a study focused on pharyngeal reconstruction technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2024

Yagmur Barcan*
Affiliation:
Health Sciences University Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Istanbul, Turkey
Yalcin Alimoglu
Affiliation:
Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Istanbul, Turkey
Gokhan Gurbuz
Affiliation:
Behcelievler State Hospital, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Istanbul, Turkey
Omer Uysal
Affiliation:
Istanbul University–Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Corresponding author: Yagmur Barcan; Email: yagmurbarcan@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study investigated the risk factors for developing pharyngocutaneous fistula, the most common complication following total laryngectomy.

Methods

We included all patients who underwent total laryngectomy and bilateral neck dissection from 2009 to 2021. Patients excluded were those with hypopharyngeal involvement, total or partial pharyngectomy, base of the tongue resection, large pharyngeal defects requiring free/pedicle flap reconstruction, or salvage laryngectomy.

Results

A total of 164 patients participated in the study. Multivariate regression analysis identified two independent predictors of pharyngocutaneous fistula formation: pharyngeal reconstruction with simple interrupted sutures (odds ratio: 3.12, 95 per cent confidence interval: 1.31–17.00, p = 0.010) and radical neck dissection (odds ratio: 3.16, 95 per cent confidence interval: 1.13–8.82, p = 0.028).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that pharyngeal reconstruction using simple interrupted sutures and radical neck dissection are independent risk factors for pharyngocutaneous fistula development. Based on this, we recommend using the modified Cushing suture technique over simple interrupted sutures due to its association with a significantly lower pharyngocutaneous fistula rate.

Information

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED
Figure 0

Figure 1. Modified Cushing suturing method. (a) Sutures do not disturb mucosal blood supply by not penetrating mucosa. (b) Closer look at top view. The needle enters from A (1 mm away from the edge) and exits from A′ (0.5 mm away from the edge) with an oblique manoeuvre. On the corresponding side, the needle enters from B (1 mm behind of A′) and exits from B′. Knots can be seen on D′ and H′.

Figure 1

Table 1. Demographic characteristics; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Hgb = haemoglobin; SD = standard deviation; TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Number of PCF (-) and PCF (+) patients with lateral and radical neck dissection. (b) Number of PCF (-) and PCF (+) patients with simple interrupted suture and modified Cushing suture. PCF = pharyngocutaneous fistula.

Figure 3

Table 2. Comparison of PCF (−) and PCF (+) groups; PCF = pharyngocutaneous fistula; Hgb = haemoglobin; SD = standard deviation; TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone

Figure 4

Table 3. Regression analysis; CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio