Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T12:37:04.774Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Membranes with selective wettability for the separation of oil–water mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2015

Gibum Kwon
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Ethan Post
Affiliation:
Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Macromolecular Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
Anish Tuteja*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Biointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Macromolecular Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Anish Tuteja atatuteja@umich.edu

Abstract

The separation of oil–water mixtures is a widely utilized unit operation, used for handling a wide variety of mixtures from industry including: petroleum drilling and refining, fracking, waste-water treatment, mining, metal fabrication and machining, textile and leather processing, and rendering. Membrane-based methods have become increasingly attractive for the separation of oil–water mixtures because they are relatively energy-efficient, can be readily used to separate a variety of industrial feed streams, and provide consistent permeate quality. In this perspective, we discuss the design strategies for membranes with selective wettability i.e., membranes that are either selectively wet by, or prevent wetting by, the oil or water phase. The design strategies include the parameterization of two important physical characteristics: the surface porosity and the breakthrough pressure. We also discuss how they are related for membranes with a periodic geometry. On the basis of this understanding, we explore principles that allow for the systematic design of membranes with selective wettability. A review of the current literature on the separation of oil–water mixtures using membranes with differing wettabilities is also presented. Finally, we conclude by discussing the current challenges and outlook for the future of the field.

Information

Type
Prospective Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Liquid droplets on textured surfaces. The (a) Wenzel and (b) Cassie–Baxter states are shown. In the diagrams, R is the feature radius, 2D is the inter-feature spacing, θ is the equilibrium contact angle, θ* is the apparent contact angle, and ψ is the texture angle. Adapted from Kota et al.[21] © 2014 with permission from Nature Publishing Group.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Composite interfaces and hierarchical texture. (a) A Cassie–Baxter state on a concave texture with ψ > 90° and θ > 90°. (b) A similar state exists with a lower surface tension liquid (θ < 90°) on convex, re-entrant texture (ψ < 90°). (c) A hierarchical texture combines coarser and finer textures to maximize the solid–air interface. Adapted from Kota et al.[21] © 2014 with permission from Nature Publishing Group.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Membrane classification based on selective wettability for oil and water. A membrane is HP/OL when θ*water > 90° and θ*oil < 90°, HL/OL when θ*water < 90° and θ*oil < 90°, HL/OP when θ*water < 90° and θ*oil > 90°, and HP/OP when θ*water > 90° and θ*oil > 90°.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Coated stainless steel meshes with selective wettability. (a,b) Textured Teflon coating on stainless steel mesh. (c,d) The superhydrophobic and superoleophilic nature of the mesh. Reproduced from Feng et al.[39] © 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (e) The fabrication of a NDM treated mesh. (f,g) The separation of a hexane-water mixture with the apparatus at a 15° tilt angle. (h) Efficiencies for the separation of a variety of oils and water with the PDA–NMD mesh. Adapted with permission from Cao et al.[42] Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Copper mesh modification and separation ability. (a) and (b) SEM images of a copper mesh coated with Cu nanoparticles. (c,d) The separation of chloroform and water with the as-prepared copper mesh. Reprinted with permission from Wang and Guo.[44] © 2013 AIP Publishing LLC. (e,f) Etched and 1-hexadecanethiol treated copper mesh with 135 µm pore size and “nano-hills.” (g,h) Removal of diesel oil from water as the oil permeates and the water rolls off the mesh into the surrounding vial. Adapted with permission from Wang et al.[45] Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society.

Figure 5

Figure 6. The switchable wetting of stearic acid modified Cu(OH)2 nanoneedles on a copper mesh. (a,b) Schematics illustrating the switchable wettability for the mesh. Stearic acid self-assembled monolayer (SAM) provides superhydrophobicity, while THF desorbs this layer to provide a superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic mesh. SEM images are provided, with high magnification insets, of (c) a mesh with Cu(OH)2 nanoneedles, (d) a SAM modified mesh, and (e) a THF desorbed mesh. (f) A diesel–water mixture was tested on the membrane showing that the SAM modified mesh allowed diesel permeation (g), while the THF desorbed mesh permeated water (h,i). Adapted with permission from Liu et al.[46] Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

Figure 6

Figure 7. F-PBZ/SiO2 nanoparticle-modified, electrospun cellulose acetate membranes. (a) The fabrication strategy for a nanofibrous membrane produced using electrospinning and (b) the separation ability of the fabricated membrane tested with a 50% v/v mixture of dichloromethane and water. Adapted from Shang et al.[48] © 2012 with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 7

Figure 8. F-PBZ/Al2O3 nanoparticle-modified, electrospun silica nanofibrous (SNF) membranes. (a) Procedure for the synthesis of relatively durable nanofibrous membranes (b) The gravity-driven separation of a span80-stabilized water-in-petroleum ether nanoemulsion. (c) The optical clarity of the oil after separation is apparent in the photograph and optical micrographs. Adapted from Huang et al.[50] © 2013 with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 8

Figure 9. SWCNTs and silicone nanofilament membranes. (a) A TEM image of a 70 nm thick SWCNT film showing its interlaced structure. (b) The SWCNT film supported by a steel hoop and (c) the selective permeation of oil from an emulsion using this film. Reproduced from Shi et al.[55] © 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (d,e) Silicone nanofilaments grown on a polyester textile. (f) The simple separation of an octane and water mixture. Reproduced from Zhang et al.[56] © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Figure 9

Figure 10. Hydrogel and CTS coated meshes for oil and water separations. (a) 50 µm, stainless steel mesh coated with a PAM hydrogel. (b,c) Water, from a crude oil–water mixture, selectively permeated through the membrane. Reproduced from Xue et al.[63] © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (d) SEM image of a PEDOT-PSS hydrogel coated Ti mesh. (e,f) The mesh was used to separate a diesel and 1 m sulfuric acid mixture without any degradation. Reproduced from Teng et al.[64] © 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (g) CTS coated on a rough Cu mesh with nanopapillae. (h) The water permeated out of a crude oil and water mixture and (i) a high separation efficiency was seen for several oils, even in saline conditions. Adapted with permission from Zhang et al.[65] Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

Figure 10

Figure 11. GO and zeolite-coated mesh membranes. (a) GO coated on 38 µm pore-size stainless steel mesh. (b) The separation apparatus showing the permeation of water and rejection of hexane (dyed red) by the GO-coated mesh. (c) High separation efficiency was seen for a variety of oils. Adapted from Dong et al.[68] © 2014 with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry. (d) An SEM image of the zeolite-coated mesh film (ZCMF-12) and (e) a demonstration of its ability to selectively remove water from crude oil. (f) The residual oil content in water for different oils after the separation. Adapted from Wen et al.[69] © 2013 with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry. (g)–(i) A zeolite membrane on top of stainless steel mesh separated chloroform (dyed red) and water mixtures efficiently while maintaining high dichloromethane contact angles over 14 separations. Reprinted from Zeng et al.,[70] Copyright 2014, with permission from Elsevier.

Figure 11

Figure 12. Hierarchically structured copper (II) hydroxide on copper mesh. (a) An SEM image of Cu(OH)2 nanoneedles and microscale spherical crystals on top of a copper mesh. (b,c) Selective permeation of water and retention of diesel was achieved. (d) The oil content in the collected water, and the separation efficiency for a variety of oils. (e) Separation efficiency over extended numbers of separations. Reproduced from Liu et al.[71] © 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Figure 12

Figure 13. Modified polypropylene membranes for oil–water separation. (a) A schematic illustrating the treatment of a polypropylene membrane with dopamine and PEI, and (b) its use for separating a dichloroethane in water emulsion. Adapted from Yang et al.[74] © 2014 with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) Method for producing silica and PDA/PEI decorated polypropylene membranes that (d) show high water permeation, while rejecting several oils. Adapted with permission from  Yang et al.[75] Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

Figure 13

Figure 14. Electrospun composite polymer membranes for water purification. (a) Process for the fabrication of cellulose/PVDF–HFP composite membranes. 10 wt% oil-in-water emulsions were made with (b) corn oil, (c) gasoline, (d) motor oil, and (e) crude oil. In each window (b)–(e), the emulsion is on the left and the aqueous permeate is on the right. Reprinted from Ahmed et al.,[76] Copyright 2014, with permission from Elsevier. (f) Fabrication procedure for cross-linked  PEGDA nanofibers supported on PAN/polyethylene glycol nanofibrous (x-PEGDA@PG NF) membranes. (g) Soybean oil (dyed red) and water were separated using the x-PEGDA@PG NF membrane. Adapted from Raza et al.[77] © 2014 with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 14

Figure 15. TiO2 composite membranes. (a) and (b) Sodium silicate and TiO2 nanoparticles on top of a stainless steel mesh selectively removed water from gasoline (c) Anti-fouling properties shown by water contact angle changes on the silicate/TiO2 coated mesh in five cycles of oleic acid contamination and UV illumination-based recovery. Adapted from Zhang et al.[82] under Creative Commons License CC-BY 3.0 (d) A graphene-TiO2 membrane could separate a surfactant-stabilized toluene-in-water emulsion. (e,f) Water, with varying concentrations of salt, was also removed from crude oil at different temperatures. Adapted from Gao et al.[83] © 2014 with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 15

Figure 16. Hygro-responsive membranes for oil–water separation. (a) Water (blue) and rapeseed oil (red) contact angles on a stainless steel mesh (top) and a polyester fabric (bottom) dip coated in 20 wt% fluorodecyl POSS + x-PEGDA blend. (b) Optical microscopy image of a 20 wt% fluorodecyl POSS + x-PEGDA blend surface in air and (c) underwater showing the surface reconfiguration. (d) A four-component mixture of water, hexadecane, 30:70 (v:v) water-in-hexadecane emulsion, and a 50:50 (v:v) hexadecane-in-water emulsion was separated with a 400 mesh stainless steel membrane coated with 20 wt% fluorodecyl POSS + x-PEGDA blend. (e) A continuous separation apparatus separated 30:70 (v:v) water-in-hexadecane emulsions stabilized by polysorbate80. It used a 20 wt% fluorodecyl POSS + x-PEGDA blend membrane (superhydrophilic and OP) on the bottom, and a Desmopan9370 coated sidewall membrane (HP/OL). (f) The hexadecane and water fluxes for the continuous apparatus over a period of 100 h. Reprinted from Kota et al.[32] © 2012 with permission from Nature Publishing Group.

Figure 16

Figure 17. Electrowetting of an omniphobic surface. (a) and (b) Hexadecane's contact angle on a non-textured 50 wt% fluorodecyl POSS + x-PDMS substrate was unchanged by the application of a 1.5 kV potential, while (c,d) water's contact angle decreased significantly. (e) The macroscopic contact angles for water and hexadecane on the non-textured surface as a function of applied voltage. (f) A diagram illustrating the pressure-induced liquid–air interface sagging. (g) The EWOD effect was used to separate hexadecane (red) and water (blue) on-demand. Adapted from Kwon et al.[91] © 2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim with permission from John Wiley & Sons, Inc.