The art of language provides a varied assortment of detailed, high-resolution, snapshots—each piece providing deep glimpses into interconnected aspects of its chosen subject. It covers a variety of theoretical and practical considerations in which linguistic work can be approached, how linguistic work can invite challenge and dispute within firmly held misconceptions, and how one person can impact the lives of communities and inspire other scholars to do the same as they keep pushing the boundaries of the discipline.

For scholars in the fields of sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology, the book provides detailed insights and examples for how one can holistically immerse into the sociocultural and political details that shape and inform the language use of a community. In the chapter about the system of kin terms in White Hmong, Nerida Jarkey comprehensively articulates the conditions behind and implications of a shift in the usage of kin terms and demonstrates how linguistic systems reflect and reinforce power imbalances between men and women, even within societies known for having a strong egalitarian ideology. The book also provides glimpses into both the joy and difficulty of embracing an approach that leaves the researcher vulnerable and open to the people and communities they work with. The hate mail received and shared by Kate Burridge for her work, and the accompanying analysis, provides a sober yet hopeful view on how to approach publicly resonant misconceptions about language and the work of linguists. Lastly, as demonstrated in the acknowledgements at the end of most chapters, the book provides scholars a glimpse into how linguistic work can intertwine us with societies larger than our own.

As a showcase of how linguistic scholarship can keep expanding beyond conventional methodologies, the book offers a broad selection of theoretical constructs, contexts, and practical adaptations that push the boundary of linguistic practice. R. M. W. Dixon's chapter, sharing his methodological negotiations dealing with moribund tongues and their few remaining guardians, provides a comprehensive example of how our work can and must deviate from standard paths. N. J. Enfield's interrogation of linguistic ‘impossibilities’ and ‘dichotomies’ demonstrates how a shift of perspective allows one to move past such difficulties.

Finally, as a dedication to the life and work of Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, the book is heartwarming and encouraging. Jovino Brito's and James Sesu Laki's respective letters, peppered with respect and adoration for Aikehnvald as they share some of the ways her work has transformed their respective communities, embody the heart of this project the most. With respect to the editors’ hope ‘that the collection of articles brought together…will result in many more questions, leading to more integrative, original and sustainable linguistic work’, the book provides an inviting wealth of resources that would allow one to start in, and find opportunities to expand upon, Aikhenvald's footsteps.