Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T00:04:04.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Computational modeling of the mechanics of hierarchical materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2016

Stefano Signetti
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Bio-Inspired & Graphene Nanomechanics, Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, Italy; stefano.signetti@unitn.it
Federico Bosia
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Nanostructured Interfaces and Surfaces Interdepartmental Centre, University of Turin, Italy; fbosia@unito.it
Nicola M. Pugno
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Bio-Inspired & Graphene Nanomechanics, Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, University of Trento, and Center for Materials and Microsystems, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Italy; and School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, UK; nicola.pugno@unitn.it

Abstract

Structural hierarchy coupled with material heterogeneity is often identified in natural materials, from the nano- to the macroscale. It combines disparate mechanical properties, such as strength and toughness, and multifunctionality, such as smart adhesion, water repellence, self-cleaning, and self-healing. Hierarchical architectures can be employed in synthetic bioinspired structured materials, also adopting constituents with superior mechanical properties, such as carbon nanotubes or graphene. Advanced computational modeling is essential to understand the complex mechanisms that couple material, structural, and topological hierarchy, merging phenomena of different nature, size, and time scales. Numerical modeling also allows extensive parametric studies for the optimization of material properties and arrangement, avoiding time-consuming and complex experimental trials, and providing guidance in the fabrication of novel advanced materials. Here, we review some of the most promising approaches, with a focus on the methods developed by our group.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Multiscale approaches to model hierarchical materials, including the region of applicability in spatial and time scales. Adapted with permission from Reference 65. © 2007 Elsevier.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Examples of multiscale structure and simulations on the strength and toughness of hierarchical biological and bioinspired materials. (a) The mechanical behavior of nanoreinforced “bionic” silk64 is modeled using molecular dynamics simulations to derive the statistical distribution of material properties for native silk proteins mixed with carbon nanotubes or graphene at the nanoscale. These distributions are then used as inputs in a hierarchical fiber bundle model,17 where hierarchical organization is modeled for the strands at various hierarchical levels up to the web structure that can be modeled within a finite element method (FEM) framework. (b) Modeling of artificial multilayer nanocomposites inspired by nacre by means of a hierarchical lattice spring model.21 The results yield material constitutive laws that are fed into FEM impact simulations. Reprinted with permission from Reference 43. © 2014 Elsevier.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Application of the theory of multiple peeling55 and cohesive zone model (CZM)-based54 finite element method (FEM) simulations to the problem of adhesion of spiderweb anchorages: (a) scanning electron microscope image of a spiderweb anchorage showing hierarchical multiple contact splitting, (b) schematization of hierarchical configuration in a multiple peeling simulation of the anchorage described by contact and split angles (φ, θ, λ) and thread lengths (li), subjected to a peeling force F. (c) CZM-based FEM models are used to investigate the role of fibril shape, elasticity, and multiple splitting in delamination simulations.54 (a) Adapted with permission from Reference 52. © 2012 Macmillan Publishers.