Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:12:47.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intestinal parasites in rural communities in Nan Province, Thailand: changes in bacterial gut microbiota associated with minute intestinal fluke infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2020

Ajala Prommi
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Pinidphon Prombutara
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Omics Science & Bioinformatics Center, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand Faculty of Science, Microbiome Research Unit for Probiotics in Food and Cosmetics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Dorn Watthanakulpanich
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Poom Adisakwattana
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Teera Kusolsuk
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Tippayarat Yoonuan
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Akkarin Poodeepiyasawat
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Nirundorn Homsuwan
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Samreong Prummongkol
Affiliation:
Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol Bangkok School of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Malee Tanita
Affiliation:
Saen Thong Health Promoting Hospital, Tha Wang Pha, Nan, Thailand
Sungkhom Rattanapikul
Affiliation:
Saen Thong Health Promoting Hospital, Tha Wang Pha, Nan, Thailand
Chuanphot Thinphovong
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
Anamika Kritiyakan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
Serge Morand
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand Faculty of Veterinary Technology, CNRS ISEM – CIRAD ASTRE, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
Kittipong Chaisiri*
Affiliation:
Department of Helminthology, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
*
Author for correspondence: Kittipong Chaisiri, E-mail: kittipong.cha@mahidol.ac.th

Abstract

Gastrointestinal helminth infection likely affects the gut microbiome, in turn affecting host health. To investigate the effect of intestinal parasite status on the gut microbiome, parasitic infection surveys were conducted in communities in Nan Province, Thailand. In total, 1047 participants submitted stool samples for intestinal parasite examination, and 391 parasite-positive cases were identified, equating to an infection prevalence of 37.3%. Intestinal protozoan species were less prevalent (4.6%) than helminth species. The most prevalent parasite was the minute intestinal fluke Haplorchis taichui (35.9%). Amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA was conducted to investigate the gut microbiome profiles of H. taichui-infected participants compared with those of parasite-free participants. Prevotella copri was the dominant bacterial operational taxonomic unit (OTU) in the study population. The relative abundance of three bacterial taxa, Ruminococcus, Roseburia faecis and Veillonella parvula, was significantly increased in the H. taichui-infected group. Parasite-negative group had higher bacterial diversity (α diversity) than the H. taichui-positive group. In addition, a significant difference in bacterial community composition (β diversity) was found between the two groups. The results suggest that H. taichui infection impacts the gut microbiome profile by reducing bacterial diversity and altering bacterial community structure in the gastrointestinal tract.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram showing research workflow.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Map of Saen Thong subdistrict, Nan Province (Google Maps) showing the landscape of the study area and the distribution of the eight studied villages. Small panel (bottom left) shows Nan Province (red) on a map of Thailand with the location of Saen Thong subdistrict marked with a yellow star.

Figure 2

Table 1. Intestinal parasite infections in villagers residing in eight villages of Saen Thong subdistrict, Tha Wang Pha district, Nan Province, Thailand

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Analysis of difference in mean H. taichui intensity (EPG) among different age groups with multiple pairwise comparison after Kruskal–Wallis with Bonferroni post-hoc test (**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001).

Figure 4

Table 2. Prevalence (%), mean intensity (MI), mean abundance (MA) and range (eggs per gram of stool) of Haplorchis taichui infection among groups of different variables (village, gender and age group)

Figure 5

Table 3. Personal attributes of the 14 H. taichui-positive and 14 parasite-negative participants of the gut microbiome profiling experiment

Figure 6

Fig. 4. The top 10 most abundant bacterial OTUs found in the present case–control study comparing H. taichui-positive (green) and parasite-free groups (red). Number of bacterial OTU reads are given in bar charts.

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Analysis of difference in bacterial α diversity based on the Shannon diversity index between H. taichui-positive and parasite-free groups. *P < 0.05.

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Analyses of gut microbial diversity and community composition between H. taichui-positive and parasite-free groups. (A) Rarefaction curves comparing bacterial α diversity (based on observed OTUs) between H. taichui-positive (light blue line) and parasite-free groups (dark blue line). (B) Rarefaction curves comparing bacterial α diversity (based on observed OTUs) of H. taichui-positive group varying in intensity (EPG) of infection. Light orange line, parasite-free; light blue line, EPG = 250–1299; dark orange line, EPG = 1300–2500; dark blue line, EPG > 2500. (C) Principal coordinates analysis plots (PCoA) created using unweighted UniFrac metric showing significant differences in clustering patterns (ANOSIM: R = 0.094, P = 0.03) of bacterial communities (β diversity) between H. taichui-positive (red) and parasite-free groups (blue).

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Results of LEfSe analysis showing differential abundance of bacterial OTUs between H. taichui-positive (green) and parasite-free groups (red).

Supplementary material: File

Prommi et al. Supplementary Materials

Prommi et al. Supplementary Materials

Download Prommi et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 17.7 KB