Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T06:49:50.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acid-treated Clay Minerals as Catalysts for Dehydration of Methanol and Ethanol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Monika Marosz
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
Andrzej Kowalczyk
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
Barbara Gil
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
Lucjan Chmielarz*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland
*
*E-mail address of corresponding author: chmielar@chemia.uj.edu.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purification of clay minerals prior to their use as catalysts can escalate processing costs so methods are needed whereby less purification is necessary. One such potential method is acid treatment of the unpurified clay minerals. The main objectives of the present study were to develop the optimal acid-treatment conditions and to determine how the acidic properties of the modified clay samples influenced their catalytic capability toward the dehydration of ethanol and methanol. Clay mineral samples – allophane, palygorskite, and sepiolite, without purification – were acid treated (0.8 M HNO3; 95°C; 2, 8, or 24 h) and after calcination (500°C; 6 h) tested as catalysts for the conversion of methanol to dimethyl ether and of ethanol to diethyl ether and ethene. The changes in chemical and structural compositions as well as surface acidity of the mineral samples were analyzed and correlated with their catalytic performance. Among the samples studied, allophane was the most catalytically active in the dehydration of methanol to dimethyl ether. Acid treatment of this mineral sample decreased methanol conversion slightly. An opposite effect was found for ethanol dehydration to diethyl ether, where acid treatment increased catalytic activity of allophane. The differences in catalytic performance of the mineral samples were discussed with respect to the nature and concentration of acid sites.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of the untreated and acid-treated forms of a allophane, b palygorskite, and c sepiolite. Q: Quartz, Cr: Cristobalite, I: Illite, A: Albite, Ah: Allophane, P: Palygorskite, D: Dolomite, S: Sepiolite, C: Calcite

Figure 1

Table 1. Chemical composition (wt.) of raw and acid-modified minerals

Figure 2

Fig. 2. ATR-FTIR spectra of the untreated and acid-treated forms of a allophane, b palygorskite, and c sepiolite

Figure 3

Fig. 3. UV-Vis-DR spectra of the untreated and acid-treated forms of a allophane, b palygorskite, and c sepiolite

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of the untreated and acid-treated forms of a allophane, b palygorskite, and c sepiolite

Figure 5

Table 2. Textural parameters and surface acidity of raw and acid-modified minerals

Figure 6

Fig. 5. NH3-TPD profiles of the untreated and acid-treated forms of a allophane, b palygorskite, and c sepiolite

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Temperature dependence of methanol conversion and DME selectivity in the process of methanol dehydration over a allophane-, b palygorskite-, and c sepiolite-based catalysts

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Temperature function of ethanol conversion and DEE and ethylene selectivity in the process of ethanol dehydration over a allophane-, b palygorskite-, and c sepiolite-based catalysts