Introduction

Instrumental records show that global mean temperature has increased by 0.6±0.2˚C over the last century, with the 1990s being the warmest decade since the start of instrumental records in 1856 (Reference Jones and MobergJones and Moberg, 2003). However, the magnitude of the warming is not uniform in different regions (Reference Yadav, Park, Singh and DubeyYadav and others, 2004). Due to incomplete understanding of natural climate variability, our ability to predict future climate change on a regional scale is still limited (Reference Hulme, Osborn and JohnsHulme and others, 1998). In recent years, high-resolution records such as ice cores, tree rings, corals, lake sediments and historic documents have become the main sources for studying the variations of temperature in the past 1000 years (Reference Mann, Bradley and HughesMann and others, 1999; Reference Jones, Osborn and BriffaJones and others, 2001; Reference Mann and JonesMann and Jones, 2003; Reference Moberg, Sonechkin, Holmgren, Datsenko and KarlénMoberg and others, 2005). However, our view of past climatic conditions is still seriously biased by the shortage of data (Reference Bradley and JonesBradley and Jones, 1993; Reference Hughes and DiazHughes and Diaz, 1994; Reference Mann, Park and BradleyMann and others, 1995), and thus cannot be used to test and validate climate models on a global scale. For example, recent temperature reconstruction using tree-ring data (Reference Esper, Cook and SchweingruberEsper and others, 2002), and tree-ring data as well as lake and ocean sediment data (Reference Moberg, Sonechkin, Holmgren, Datsenko and KarlénMoberg and others, 2005), disagrees with Reference Mann, Bradley and HughesMann and others’ (1999) result on multi-centennial timescales, suggesting we need more independent regional temperature reconstructions based on improved proxy records (Reference Keith and TimothyKeith and Timothy, 2002).

The Tibetan Plateau drives the intensity of Asian monsoon circulation and influences global circulation patterns (Reference Yanai and LiYanai and Li, 1994; Reference Li and YanaiLi and Yanai, 1996; Reference Ueda and YasunariUeda and Yasunari, 1998; Reference WebsterWebster, and others, 1998). However, climate at high altitudes of the Tibetan Plateau is poorly known due to the logistical difficulties in maintaining observational networks. The existing natural records from ice cores, tree rings and lake sediments (Reference Wang, Liu, Zhang and LiWang and others, 1983; Reference Yao and ThompsonYao and Thompson, 1992; Reference ThompsonThompson and others, 1993, Reference Thompson1997, Reference Thompson, Yao, Mosley-Thompson, Davis, Henderson and Lin2000, Reference Thompson, Mosley-Thompson, Davis, Lin, Henderson and Mashiotta2003; Reference YaoYao and others, 1996b, Reference Yao, Masson, Jouzel, Stiévenard, Sun and Jiao1999; Reference Mann and JonesTang and others, 2000; Reference Shen, Zhang and XiaShen and others, 2001; Reference Zhu, Chen, Zhang and LiZhu and others, 2001) show that climate varied differently from region to region across the Tibetan Plateau. Although Reference Mann, Bradley and HughesMann and others (1999) and Reference Jones and MobergJones and Moberg (2003) present the most comprehensive temperature reconstructions of the past 1000 years for the Northern and Southern Hemisphere, the Tibetan Plateau is not well covered. Independent temperature reconstruction for the Tibetan Plateau over the past millennium is therefore necessary to assess the climatic change in this region. Reference Yang, Achim and ShiYang and others (2003) reconstructed temperature for the Tibetan Plateau using ice-core, tree-ring, lake sediment and documentary records; however, there is a disadvantage in this type of multi-proxy approach due to the difference in resolution (from 1 year to multi-centennial) and in the different significance of proxies resulting from different processes. Therefore, the dating and significance of records using multi-proxies limited understanding of climatic changes. Since 1987, several deep ice cores have been drilled on the Tibetan Plateau, and ice-core δ¹⁸O is considered as a proxy of temperature (Reference Yao, Thompson, Mosley-Thompson, Zhihong, Xingping and LinYao and others, 1996a). In 2000, an ice core was recovered on the Puruogangri ice field, in the central Tibetan Plateau. This core is considered as a bridge for the understanding of climate change in the central Tibetan Plateau, where there was previously no long paleoclimate record, and other regions. With this new ice core, it is possible to use a single proxy to infer large-scale spatial temperature change by combining the Puruogangri ice-core δ¹⁸O record with other existing ice-core δ¹⁸O records. Here we report on the interpretation in terms of temperature evolution of a 1000 year δ¹⁸O composite record on the Tibetan Plateau based on four ice-core records.

Data

Figure 1 shows the sites of the four Tibetan Plateau ice cores used in this study and indicates the good geographical distribution, which covers most of the plateau. It particularly illustrates the importance of the newly recovered Puruogangri ice-field core recovered in 2000. Situated in the central Tibetan Plateau, the Puruogangri ice field (33˚44’–34˚03’ N, 89˚00’–89˚20’ E) is the largest ice field in the mid-latitudes, with a total area of >400km². In 2000, five cores were drilled at the summit of the Puruogangri ice field and were taken in a frozen state to the Laboratory of Ice Core and Cold Regions Environment, Lanzhou, China, and the Byrd Polar Research Center, Columbus, OH, USA. The 213 m ice core (the longest of the five ice cores; Table 1) was cut into 3–5cm samples and analyzed over its entire length for oxygen isotopic ratio (δ¹⁸O). The upper 102 m of the Puruogangri ice core (covering the last 1000 years) was dated by counting annual layers of insoluble dust and δ¹⁸O (Reference ThompsonThompson and others, 2006; Reference YaoYao and others, 2006).

Fig. 1.

Locations of the four ice cores on the Tibetan Plateau used in this study.

Table 1.

Details of the four ice cores used in this study

The other cores, Dunde, Guliya and Dasuopu, were recovered in the 1980s and 1990s (Table 1). The 138 m long Dunde ice core, drilled at 5325 ma.s.l. on the Dunde ice cap (38˚06’ N, 96˚25’ E) in 1987, provided the first ice-core record from the Tibetan Plateau, which contained a 30 000 year δ¹⁸O record with an annually reconstructed Little Ice Age (LIA) record (Reference ThompsonThompson and others, 1989; Reference Yao and ThompsonYao and Thompson, 1992). The 308m long Guliya ice core (35˚17’ N, 81˚29’ E), drilled in early 1992, displays the longest ice-core record from the Tibetan Plateau (Reference ThompsonThompson and others, 1997). The Dasuopu ice core, from an elevation of about 7000 m, drilled in 1997 in the central Himalaya, is one of two ice cores recovered at the highest altitude (7200ma.s.l.) in the world (the other is the Muztagata ice core and the results are under analyses). It is considered to provide information on long-term variations of the Indian monsoon (Reference Thompson, Yao, Mosley-Thompson, Davis, Henderson and LinThompson and others, 2000; Reference YaoYao and others, 2002; Reference Duan, Yao and ThompsonDuan and others, 2004). The Dunde, Guliya and Puruogangri ice cores have been annually dated back to AD 1000. The Dasuopu ice core has only been annually dated back to AD 1440. For the Dasuopu ice core, only decadal averages are available from AD 1439 to 1000 (Reference Thompson, Yao, Mosley-Thompson, Davis, Henderson and LinThompson and others, 2000).

δ¹⁸O Interpretation in Ice Cores

Both empirical data and model studies have shown that δ¹⁸O in polar ice cores can be interpreted in terms of local temperature (Reference DansgaardDansgaard, 1964; Reference Rozanski, Araguás-Araguás, Gonfiantini, Swart, Lohmann, McKenzie and SavinRozanski and others, 1993). Before 1989, however, there was little knowledge of δ¹⁸O variability with temperature on the Tibetan Plateau. Beginning with the establishment of monitoring stations in 1989, stable-isotope data for precipitation on the Tibetan Plateau are accumulating, and our understanding of this issue is progressing. Our study indicates differences in δ¹⁸O of precipitation between the northern and southern Tibetan Plateau on the seasonal scale. In the northern Tibetan Plateau the correlation between δ¹⁸O and air temperature is obvious on a seasonal scale (Reference Yao, Thompson, Mosley-Thompson, Zhihong, Xingping and LinYao and others, 1996a, Reference Yao, Masson, Jouzel, Stiévenard, Sun and Jiao1999; Reference TianTian and others, 2003). In the southern Tibetan Plateau, strong monsoon activity results in high precipitation and more depleted δ¹⁸O. This precipitation ‘amount effect’ results in a poor δ¹⁸O–temperature relationship at both seasonal and annual scales (Reference TianTian and others, 2003). δ¹⁸O is therefore not a temperature signal, but a monsoon signal, on seasonal and annual timescales. However, it is still a temperature signal at longer than annual timescales since it reflects sea surface processes on longer timescales (Reference Thompson, Yao, Mosley-Thompson, Davis, Henderson and LinThompson and others, 2000, Reference Thompson, Mosley-Thompson, Davis, Lin, Henderson and Mashiotta2003). This is demonstrated by the Dasuopu δ¹⁸O record which is poorly correlated with precipitation on an annual timescale but is well correlated with the air temperature at Xigaze station near Dasuopu glacier (Reference ThompsonThompson, 2000; Reference Thompson, Yao, Mosley-Thompson, Davis, Henderson and LinThompson and others, 2000) on longer timescales.

The Dunde and Guliya δ¹⁸O records are shown to be temperature signals by the relationship between δ¹⁸O in precipitation and air temperature from nearby meteorological stations (Reference Yao, Xie, Wu and ThompsonYao and others, 1991; Reference Lin, Thompson, Davis and Mosley-ThompsonLin and others, 1995; Reference TianTian and others, 2003). In the middle of the Tibetan Plateau, the Puruogangri record shows the monsoon continues to cause a weak correlation between δ¹⁸O and temperature on the precipitation event timescale (Reference TianTian and others, 2003). On a monthly timescale, however, a significant δ¹⁸O– temperature relationship exists (Reference Yao, Thompson, Mosley-Thompson, Zhihong, Xingping and LinYao and others, 1996a; Reference TianTian and others, 2003). Thus the δ¹⁸O record in the Puruogangri ice core is a temperature proxy on annual timescales as shown by a recent study correlating the δ¹⁸O record in the core and temperature from a nearby meteorological station (Reference YaoYao and others, 2006).

Method

Based on the above analysis, the δ¹⁸O records in the four ice cores reflect air-temperature variability in the western, northern, southern and central Tibetan Plateau. Given the possible uncertainties in annual dating of the ice cores and to remove the seasonal variability of δ¹⁸O, we take 10 year averages of the δ¹⁸O records for all four ice cores. To infer a temperature interpretation, a composite record was constructed using the four ice-core records. Each temperature record was standardized by removal of the long-term mean and division by the standard deviation. Theoretically, a composite series should be formed from area-weighted combinations of the individual standardized time series, but on the Tibetan Plateau most of the meteorological stations are located in the east and few in the west. Therefore there is no reliable method to divide the Tibetan Plateau into subregions for combining the ice-core record with specific area weights. As shown in Figure 1, the sites of the four ice cores have a good geographical distribution, so an equal area weight was given to each core to produce the composite record. The δ¹⁸O composite record based on the four ice cores does not provide numerical values of temperature variation but indicates the relative amplitude of temperature change.

Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the decadal δ¹⁸O records of the four ice cores over the last millennium. It is clear that there is considerable regional variability in these records. The main differences are that average δ¹⁸O increases northward and decreases with increasing core site altitude. For example, the Dasuopu ice core, collected from an elevation of 7200 m, has the lowest mean δ¹⁸O value of –20.3%. In comparison, the Puruogangri ice core (recovered at 6000ma.s.l.) and the Guliya ice core (recovered at 6200ma.s.l.) have higher mean δ¹⁸O values of –15.8% and –15.5% respectively (Table 1). Despite the similar altitudes of the Puruogangri and Guliya ice cores, δ¹⁸O values in the former are slightly lower than in the latter, which may indicate the influence of the large ice-field cooling on the latter. Collected from a much lower altitude of 5300 m, the Dunde ice core has the highest mean δ¹⁸O value of –10.8% (Table 1).

Fig. 2.

Decadal δ¹⁸O records from the Dunde ice core (a), Guliya ice core (b), Puruogangri ice core (c) and Dasuopu ice core (d) on the Tibetan Plateau in the last millennium.

The four ice cores’ δ¹⁸O composite record (Fig. 3a) indicates the temperature variation of the whole Tibetan Plateau. It is clear that inter-decadal fluctuations dominate the past 1000 years. The period from approximately AD 1090 to 1250, equivalent to the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) in Europe (AD 1000–1300), is observed to be moderately warmer than the periods both preceding and following it. This warming and those during AD 1380–1420 and 1690–1750 are dwarfed by late-20th-century warming which is observed to be unprecedented for the last millennium. The period AD 1570–1880, which appears to have been relatively cold compared to the present, represents the LIA on the Tibetan Plateau. However, the coldest period observed during the last millennium is AD 1250–1370.

Fig. 3.

Comparison of (a) decadal means of δ¹⁸O composite record for the Tibetan Plateau from four ice cores; (b) the Northern Hemisphere temperature reconstructed by Reference Mann, Bradley and HughesMann and others (1999); and (c) δ¹⁸O composite record based on the three ice cores on the northern Tibetan Plateau. Dashed lines are trend lines.

Figure 3a and b present a comparison between the four Tibetan ice cores’ δ¹⁸O composite record and the Northern Hemisphere temperature reconstruction over the period AD 1000–1980 (Reference Mann, Bradley and HughesMann and others, 1999). The correlation coefficient of the two series is 0.37 at 99% confidence level, which shows that over shorter periods the two series are almost synchronous. Both the Tibetan Plateau and the Northern Hemisphere have seen an abrupt and unprecedented increase in temperature from the late 19th century to the present.

In spite of the overall similarity of the two series, there are some remarkable differences. The main disagreement is largely confined to trends of both series. As shown in Figure 3a and b, there is an evident temperature decrease trend (slope = –1.90×10^–4 a^–1) for the Northern Hemisphere from AD 1000 to the late 19th century, whereas there is no such trend in the composite record for the Tibetan Plateau during the same period. However, this is not so apparent in the more recent reconstruction (Reference Moberg, Sonechkin, Holmgren, Datsenko and KarlénMoberg and others, 2005). Another obvious difference is that the LIA appears to be less pronounced in the Tibetan Plateau compared to the Northern Hemisphere.

Although δ¹⁸O records in the Dunde, Guliya and Puruogangri ice cores are mainly controlled by temperature, the significance of the δ¹⁸O record in the Dasuopu ice core is rather complex because of the monsoon influence. The δ¹⁸O record in the Dasuopu ice core is considered as a temperature proxy over multi-decadal timescales. It is, however, important to consider at times that the temperature proxy may contain non-temperature influences. In Figure 3c we show a composite record based on δ¹⁸O in the three cores located in the northern Tibetan Plateau – Dunde, Guliya and Puruogangri – where temperature dominates the δ¹⁸O signal. This composite record indicates that the 20th-century warming is also abrupt and exceptional. Unlike the composite record based on the four ice cores, this one shows an evident temperature decrease trend (slope =–2.27×10^–5 a^–1) from AD 1000 to 1810, which is similar to Reference Mann, Bradley and HughesMann and others’ (1999) temperature reconstruction for the Northern Hemisphere. Another remarkable difference in the two δ¹⁸O composite records between the three northern ice cores and all four ice cores is that the MWP and the LIA are warmer in the former than in the latter. In summary, both series show agreement on multi-decadal timescales, suggesting that cold or warm periods on the Tibetan Plateau are almost synchronous with those in the Northern Hemisphere (Fig. 3).

A number of studies have reconstructed Northern Hemisphere temperature for the last millennium using different proxy data and methods. These in turn, have resulted in discrepancies in temperature reconstructions (Reference Mann, Bradley and HughesMann and others, 1999; Reference Esper, Cook and SchweingruberEsper and others, 2002; Reference Keith and TimothyKeith and Timothy, 2002; Reference Moberg, Sonechkin, Holmgren, Datsenko and KarlénMoberg and others, 2005). This means that we need more independent reconstructions based on improved single proxy records. Our ice-core records provide a history of climate change for the Tibetan Plateau over the last millennium, which supplements the Northern Hemisphere reconstruction. Moreover, our δ¹⁸O composite record temperature interpretation for the Tibetan Plateau provides a test of the climate model’s response to different forcings. For example, the Tibetan Plateau is far from human activity relative to other regions in the tropics and subtropics, and climate change on the Tibetan Plateau should respond more directly to natural forcing, and any disturbance from human activity might be sensibly detected on the Tibetan Plateau. The temperature reconstruction for the Tibetan Plateau shows the abrupt and exceptional climatic warming in the 20th century compared to other warm periods in the last millennium, which might indicate that anthropogenic forcing is responsible for the climate warming on the Tibetan Plateau since the industrial revolution. The greatest promise of these ice-core records is that they will provide a much-needed long-term perspective over many millennia.

Conclusions

The temperature reconstruction for the Tibetan Plateau inferred from a composite of four ice-core δ¹⁸O records demonstrates evidence of climate warming during the last millennium. The δ¹⁸O composite record shows a strong increase in temperature during the late 19th and 20th centuries. The δ¹⁸O composite record also addressed the existence of the MWP and the LIA on the Tibetan Plateau. The LIA on the Tibetan Plateau is, however, not the coldest period during the past 1000 years as it is in other regions in the Northern Hemisphere. It is only a period which is colder than the present.