Sappho’s nuptial production violates our understanding of the poet in a significant manner. This is a traditional, uncultured and lowbrow output,Footnote 1 against the evocative, refined, sophisticated and delicate remainder of the œuvre.Footnote 2 It is the choral exception (alongside a few hymns for public performance) for an author traditionally perceived as monodic.Footnote 3 It is a collection that promotes normativity, heterosexuality and monogamy vs her para-nuptial receptions as a prostitute, promiscuous woman, manly woman and queer figure.Footnote 4 It makes us imagine Sappho’s function in Lesbos as a teacher that prepared girls for the wedding.Footnote 5 Moreover, it impacted Sappho’s Alexandrian edition deeply: were there eight books indicated numerically and a book called Epithalamia; a book called Epithalamia and epithalamia scattered throughout the œuvre, particularly as book ends; or only eight books?Footnote 6 These overlapping issues have caused an overestimation of Sappho’s epithalamic output: ‘since the epithalamion is an easily imagined social occasion, Sappho’s poems are forced to be epithalamia whether they wish it or not’.Footnote 7 With this, a plethora of fragments, including some of her most recognizable work, such as frr. 16, 27, 30, 31, 43, 44, the Tithonus Song, 94, etc., are taken to be nuptial.Footnote 8
Are scholars, though, too quick to accept Sappho’s epithalamic face to the detriment of other genres? Caciagli notes how Athenaeus’ reception of Sappho highlighted her sympotic attributions, a matter further explored by Schlesier.Footnote 9 Bierl and Lardinois, in turn, warn about an over-representation of erotic matters in Sappho’s reception.Footnote 10 In the same vein, I argue that, even if Sappho became central to the epithalamium and was seen as an originator of sorts, the wedding songs are over-represented in modern scholarship. To approach this discussion, my argument follows three steps. First, I focus on Sappho’s Alexandrian edition to defend the idea that frr. 104–17b should be seen as part of a stand-alone ninth book, Epithalamia, and that the possible book ends (namely, frr. 27, 30, 43, 44) are different in nature from these scraps, even if they appear epithalamic on a first reading. Then, I briefly touch on fr. 31 to show how easily an epithalamic reading can arise. Finally, I turn to frr. 27 and 30 to offer a new reading for these poems: not wedding songs, but songs of the Adonia.
I begin with some caveats. I use ‘epithalamia’ and ‘hymenaia’ interchangeably. The ancients had several words for the wedding song, but their limits are not always clear.Footnote 11 Modern scholars frequently try to place fragments or parts of songs within specific moments of the ceremony.Footnote 12 The evidence is thin for such determinations, as similar topoi appear at different stages and the fragments do not offer enough context. Finally, the provocation in my title is not meant to deny Sappho her role as a singer of wedding songs. She excelled at this genre and became its central model, undermining even Alcman when it came to the reception of the epithalamium.Footnote 13 The Lesbian performer, however, had other possibilities of presentation in her community. The references to the wedding rite in Sappho’s poetry are connected to the importance of marriage for the life of the woman and for the maintenance of the polis; the poetic use of recurring characters (such as the nubile girl, or the married woman who continues to transpire charm); and the nature of life in a traditional society, where women learn from and grow up with other women before being ready to share their lives with the men of those (or of neighbouring) societies.Footnote 14 That said, an overestimation of her hymenaia has hindered both a better understanding of that genre (well represented in later generations) and the true breadth of Sappho’s production.
THE EPITHALAMIA AND WEDDING PERFORMANCE
Sappho’s virtuosity made her canonical early on,Footnote 15 so much so that both textual transcription and reperformance guaranteed her Panhellenic renown.Footnote 16 This means circulation independent of original context. Sappho received local editions, such as those of Athens and Mytilene.Footnote 17 It is unclear how these crossed the sea to Alexandria, but it is generally agreed that the lyric authors received previous editorial work before arriving there.Footnote 18 There is a chance that Sappho’s verse (like that of Alcaeus) was first handled by Aristophanes of Byzantium,Footnote 19 with the so-called Alexandrian edition prepared by Aristarchus.Footnote 20 Its final product is a contentious matter. YatromanolakisFootnote 21 believes there were eight books, with most epithalamia in the last one and some scattered in the earlier books. Tsantsanoglou,Footnote 22 in turn, defends the existence of two books of epithalamia (Books 7 and 8), one with songs for mortal weddings and one with songs for the marriage of Heracles and Hebe. I agree with Prauscello, who proves on papyrological grounds that the edition had nine books, with the last one called Epithalamia, which is also attested in Servius Auctus.Footnote 23 This confirms Liberman’s assumption of one book for each Muse, with eight organized metrically—with metrical homogeneity in the earlier books and increasing metrical heterogeneity starting in Book 4Footnote 24 —and a final book marked by a different criterion of organization, the generic one.Footnote 25
The following picture then arises: nine books, one called Epithalamia (frr. 104–17b), not only metrically heterogeneous but also metrically disparate, while other epithalamia were placed in the end of previous books, if they fit metrically.Footnote 26 As such, frr. 27 and 30, for instance, would be epithalamia in the sapphic strophe, and frr. 43 and 44, in glyconics with double dactylic expansion (gl2d). This has an impact on how we understand the ordering of poems within each book. The evidence is scarce, but the Newest Sappho indicates two principles: an ordering by topicFootnote 27 and an alphabetical ordering (by the first letter only) within that topic.Footnote 28 That is, the epithalamia were so important that they were chosen to close Sappho’s scrolls and they were so abundant that whatever did not fit the metres of the previous books would be clumped together in the Epithalamia. This model makes Sappho strongly invested in a nuptial production. As such, it caused some discomfort. Obbink, for example, notes of the ends of Books 1 and 2: ‘they were explicitly songs about participation in weddings, which does not necessarily mean that they were epithalamia.’Footnote 29 Prauscello warns about a possible overestimation of this production: ‘there is no reason to argue that the book entitled Epithalamia would not have included all of Sappho’s wedding-songs proper.’Footnote 30 Both are correct.
We must note important differences between the longer poems read as epithalamiaFootnote 31 and frr. 104–17b, attributed to the Epithalamia. These all survive in quotations rather than on papyrus, were imitated by later poets,Footnote 32 and decodified (to some extent) by epideictic rhetoricians, such as Menander Rhetor (2.399.11–412.2). These songs were choral,Footnote 33 metrically disparateFootnote 34 and offered at ceremonies that were at once public, communal and private, related to the union of families of Lesbos and neighbouring communities.Footnote 35 They are marked by a ‘common’ use of languageFootnote 36 —that is, popular and traditional in tone—and, in addition to the metrical variation, they can use refrains to separate entire strophes or single lines.Footnote 37 These are features connected with ad hoc rites, and their deictic quality is apparent, as they focus on a ceremony happening here and now. At times, characters such as the father, the bride or her virginity appear to be impersonated by the chorus (frr. 107, 109, 114). The fragments are marked by humour (frequently sexual), use of hyperbole (frr. 105a, 105b, 106, 111, 113, 115), similes (especially botanical ones), makarismos (frr. 108, 112), apostrophes and the presence of Hesperus. These qualities introduce and entice the bride to the groom in apotropaic fashion. Their focus is the woman and her transition, as they consider female fear, separation from the family and the anxieties related to the uncertainties she faces. It is likely that the choral education prompted by these poems prepared the younger girls for their own wedding day while soothing the bride at the brink of womanhood. The songs could end in farewells, as the couple entered the bedroom to consummate the ceremony (frr. 116, 117). Ancient readers found them to be graceful, charming and beautiful.Footnote 38
These characteristics prove that these were songs used for the nuptial rite, wedding songs properly understood. Hence it would be strange if these poems were placed in the Epithalamia simply because they slipped through the cracks of other (mechanical) forms of arrangement, such as metre. This leads to the next question: beyond these, what else could be performed at a wedding? We do not know what wedding celebrations in archaic Lesbos looked like, and extant descriptions tend to be lavish and mythological, as in fr. 44 and Catullus 64, or late, as in Lucian’s Symposium, and, as such, questionable. The picture is not clear even when focussing on the earlier sources, which depict the rite and the banquet preceding it. For the first, in Homer we hear of a procession marked by hymenaia, the sound of flute and lyre and young men who accompany and dance (Il. 18.491–5), while Sappho describes a splendid ceremony, with pipe, kithara and castanets, not to mention songs by the virgins, the older ladies and the gentlemen of Troy (fr. 44). The banquet, too, was marked by entertainments, as we hear about solo lyre performance (Il. 24.62–3) and a solo singer accompanied by acrobats (Od. 4.17–19).
The most extensive extant description of the banquet is in Lucian’s Symposium, a much later source. It has speeches, readings from books, a Homeric and Pindaric cento, encomia, wedding songs and even a clown show that displeased the guests of this botched ceremony (Symposium 16–18). At any rate, this was a busy event, open to different types of presentation with different tones, from the serious and celebratory to the ridiculous. This was not only a moment for revelry, but it also marked the departure of the girl from her father’s house and the start of the alliance between the parties involved,Footnote 39 which explains the extreme emotions elicited by Lucian. Wedding banquets are somewhat personal, and one must assume that families had flexibility to choose what kind of party they would have. One notable testimony is that of Aristoxenos and Phillis the musician, who say that ‘at weddings, putting many seats around one table and bearing myrtle, they sing in succession proverbs and serious love-songs’.Footnote 40 Several poems of Sappho fit the category of ἐρωτικὰ σύντονα, ‘serious love-songs’, which makes her figuration as a wedding banquet singer seductive.
If only the book ends and excerpts from the ninth book were wedding songs, one could imagine the following scenario: in the early stages of textual fixation (before Alexandria), those in charge of Sappho’s local collections, such as the one of Mytilene or Athens, made a distinction between songs for the rite and songs for the banquet. The Alexandrian edition would have reflected this, with the former placed in the Epithalamia and the latter in the book ends. This does not resolve, however, how other fragments were read as epithalamia owing to tenuous references to a wedding.Footnote 41 Moreover, the ‘end of book’ theory stands on shaky grounds. Take fr. 44 for example. Book 2 ended with fr. 43, and 44, of different execution but probably written by the same scribe underneath its end-title, was a late addition, a blow to the epithalamic ending theory.Footnote 42 Moreover, while it engages with the celebratory tone of the wedding song, it also responds to the epic tradition, fitting neither determination quite precisely.Footnote 43 This makes one question whether the song was ever meant to be presented at a wedding banquet. I summarize the issue in the following way: there are significant questions regarding the theory that epithalamia closed Sappho’s books, while frr. 104–17b—undoubtedly epithalamic—are markedly different from the songs in the book ends. Moreover, critics can be too quick to catalogue songs that mention weddings as wedding songs. Hence, I consider that these poems are not epithalamia, but they simply evoke Sappho’s group activities more broadly.
FR. 31
Fr. 31 exemplifies this discussion well, as it has been read as an epithalamium to present Sappho as a female tutor who instructs her girls with regard to the wedding,Footnote 44 when other performative possibilities are more viable.Footnote 45 The theory is not new (Wilamowitz defended it first),Footnote 46 relies on little textual grounding, and has attracted both support and staunch criticism. The poem received this fame for two reasons, the use of ἴσος θέοισιν (‘equal to the gods’, fr. 31.1), similar to ἶσος Ἄρευι (‘equal to Ares’, fr. 111.5), an undisputed wedding song; and the setting, that of a man sitting in front of a woman, which would be possible at a wedding party.Footnote 47 Snell carefully analyses the song as praise poetry, without, however, denying its marital context.Footnote 48 Page, in turn, calls the epithalamic reading a ‘modern misinterpretation’.Footnote 49 For Page, it relies on preconceived notions about Sappho, a reconstruction that overestimates what we know about gendered interactions in Lesbos and a disregard for the fact that the song mentions no bride, groom or wedding.Footnote 50 Indeed, the eikasia might be common in the epithalamium, but it is by no means exclusive to it. Moreover, as frr. 104–17b demonstrate, not only is the comparison to gods less common,Footnote 51 but fr. 111 uses an epic form.Footnote 52 An epithalamic reading, therefore, requires the reader to ignore the language and formal structure of everything that follows the first stanza,Footnote 53 if it indeed evokes a wedding.
With regard to the setting, Ferrari concedes the nuptial tone of the first verse, but notes that, as far as later examples testify, men and women would have sat separately in a wedding banquet, which complicates the interaction between the characters.Footnote 54 One can add that the scene does not mention the procession to the groom’s house, the most commonly described moment of the ceremony.Footnote 55 Furthermore, it presents a severe emotional outburst on the part of the poet: the voice fails (7–9), the hearing is impaired (11–12), the body stops responding in an orderly manner (10, 13–16). The intense fretfulness constricts the vocal instrument and bewilders the senses that produce the flow of movement. Such a physical response prevents proper performative functioning—a singer at a complete musical loss. Even if we understand the physical effect as a jest (that is, as a hyperbolic compliment to an attractive bride), this is the opposite of what is necessary in a wedding rite, which is typically marked by loud singing, instrumental accompaniment and choreographed dancing.
Different contextual solutions have been posed: an evocation of the epithalamic situation within Sappho’s group,Footnote 56 a symposium where a solo performer sings to her lyre while seeing young men and hetairai who sit and recline together,Footnote 57 or a religious festival, which would have allowed for men and women to interact, prompting courting inside the sanctuary (as in Archilochus’ Cologne Epode).Footnote 58 I am inclined to take the last as correct. Moreover, owing to its central position in the island of Lesbos, connection to a pan-Lesbian identity, and shared cult of a unique divine triad (Zeus, Hera and Dionysus), a sanctuary like the one at Messon appears to be a likely location for this.Footnote 59 In such a setting, the choral body could materialize the failure of the singer’s body. This is how Bierl reads the Kypris Song, which similarly describes the bodily effects of unrequited desire.Footnote 60 Such a description can fit the worship of Aphrodite, or of Dionysus given the emphasis on manic excitement and the sparagmos. That said, the epithalamic misattribution is not trivial, as it reveals a common feature of Sappho’s fragments—namely, that they ‘envisage performance situations, but very rarely situate themselves straightforwardly as the focal point of the performance itself’.Footnote 61 This is particularly relevant in the case of wedding poetry, as nuptial language can be used in erotic discourses and vice versa.Footnote 62 The proposal of a religious festival is an important alternative reading to poems that are commonly read as wedding songs.Footnote 63 Fr. 16, for example, could very well be performed at the Kallisteia, an annual festival and beauty contest held as a celebration of Hera in Messon; the Tithonus Song targets a large audience, allowing itself to be performed publicly by both girls and boys; fr. 94, finally, is a propemptikon to a friend (or a pupil), analogous to fr. 5 or the Brother’s Song, not an epithalamium.Footnote 64
FRR. 27, 30 AND THE ADONIA
Considering this, I turn to frr. 27 and 30. Both are commonly read as wedding songs,Footnote 65 particularly because the first mentions a wedding (8) and the second a bride (4–5). I propose, instead, that we read both together as pertaining to the Adonia. It is impossible to say if these poems were indeed performed at once, but they share significant thematic similarities. The focus on girls (27.10, 30.2), performance (27.5, 30.2) and the wedding attests to this. Moreover, taken together, they propose a narrative. The first enacts an encounter between chorus leaders (who share a memory about their past), as one of them makes her way to a wedding, while the second describes how the girls who have been singing about the bride all night call the boys to join the rite. I believe that the songs show a progression in the night and that the wedding in question is the failed union of Aphrodite and Adonis. Both fragments lack their incipits, so it is hard to tell to what extent the alphabetical ordering would have prevailed, but the logic of the situation persists.
The Adonia was a community-wide event that brought smaller groups of women together, marked by both younger and older women.Footnote 66 The scraps surrounding frr. 27 and 30 are mostly illegible, but fr. 29 names Gorgo (a rival) and Girinno (a friend), so it is likely that the female conversations surrounding this event were present in the missing songs as well. My hypothesis chances upon a difficulty and a potential problem. The difficulty is that we know little about the genre of songs to Adonis. Proclus, for example, preserved in Photius, simply remarks that ‘we call Adonisian the verses attributed to Adonis’.Footnote 67 The potential problem is that most evidence for the Adonia is from Classical Athens or Hellenistic Alexandria. Lesbos and/or Cyprus, however, are taken to be the possible conduits of the cult from the East to Greece,Footnote 68 so the different versions of the celebration may share similarities. Following the Athenian example, these festivals happened yearly and revolved around women who mourned the death of Adonis by bringing pots of sprouted seeds to their rooftops to conduct mock funerals to the youth.Footnote 69 Sappho’s fr. 140 focusses exactly on the lamentation of girls over the dead Adonis. There, the chorus dialogues with the goddess (impersonated by a solo singer or a half chorus, it seems), who mourns for the dead just like a mortal would have.Footnote 70 Frr. 27 and 30, in turn, revolve around previous steps of the festivity, as the girls prepare the nuptial celebration for the goddess, before they display their grief.
That the festivity takes the form of a wedding is no surprise. Theocritus 15,Footnote 71 for example, indicates a two-day festival, with a celebration of the union of the couple on one day followed by ritual mourning the next (127–34).Footnote 72 Moreover, the singer of the Ptolemaic festival calls Adonis γαμβρός (129), which unites ‘Sappho’s marriage songs and Adonis-songs in a single literary pedigree’.Footnote 73 Bion’s Epitaph Footnote 74 is even more explicit, as the singer wakes up to mourn (1–5) the death of Aphrodite’s husband (πόσιν, 24), while the goddess perceives herself as a widow (χήρα, 59). Even Hymenaeus makes an appearance (87–90), as he had adorned the city for the nuptials, but his songs will be replaced for lamentation.Footnote 75 The similarities also appear in iconography, as accounts of the Adonia take from nuptial contexts.Footnote 76 It becomes clear, therefore, that the Adonia was contiguous to marriage and borrowed imagery and vocabulary from it.Footnote 77 This explains the misreading of frr. 27 and 30. Another relevant account is Aphrodite’s seduction of Anchises as related in the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite. Sappho knew this poem,Footnote 78 and it concerns the unions between mortals and gods. In 126–44, for example, Aphrodite vehemently frames her sexual entanglement as a marriage. For Adonis, however, the event becomes a marriage to death.
The Adonia encompassed the extremes of hilarity and mourning,Footnote 79 and frr. 27 and 30 focus on the former. In the first song, Sappho and her chorus encounter a woman, and the leader says ‘we are going to a wedding’ (σ]τείχομεν γὰρ ἐς γάμον, 8). This is the only (and inconclusive)Footnote 80 evidence that suggests an epithalamium.Footnote 81 Contrary to the expectation of a present ceremony, the poem expresses the possibility of a future performance.Footnote 82 Upon closer inspection, however, it suggests a reflexive account of Sappho’s practice: the circumstance of celebrating through song and dance (μέλπεσθαι, 5), the memory of a past connection with the interlocutor (ποτε, 4), the interaction between women of different generations, some of whom are at the threshold of womanhood (παῖς, 4; παρθένος, 10), while the wedding is central to these girls.Footnote 83 Some speculate that Sappho’s interlocutor is a bride.Footnote 84 This cannot be, as the addressee is described as a mature woman in charge of younger girls.Footnote 85
Ferrari analyses fr. 27 in terms of rivalry, as an unnamedFootnote 86 chorus leader (addressee) interacts with another (Sappho) to share a past memory before they part.Footnote 87 To uphold the epithalamic reading, he connects it to Il. 18.495–6, where women by their doors watch a wedding procession. This is only conjectural. The women in the shield see the celebration as it happens, but Sappho’s setting seems to be earlier. The state of preservation of fr. 27 does not help, but two possibilities emerge. If the women are rival chorodidaskaloi, Sappho abuses the interlocutor, demonstrating she is invited (or hired) to perform at the ritual, while the other one is not.Footnote 88 Or, perhaps, they are friendly and head to the same celebration (ἀλλ᾿ ὄττι τάχιστα[ | πα]ρ[θ]ένοις ἄπ[π]εμπε, 9–10). This is a scene of female life at Lesbos, and Sappho shows how to dodge an unwelcomed interaction in a public setting (after a brief conversation), owing either to enmity or to haste. Hence, she models specific and important communal behaviours, teaching how to engage and disengage with an acquaintance (in positive or negative terms) without losing standing.
The verses that follow connect this interaction to the Adonia more specifically: ]ὄδος μ[έ]γαν εἰς Ὄλ[υμπον | ἀ]νθρω[π ]αίκ .[ (12–13). The gnomic endingFootnote 89 points to the impossibility of human ascension. While Reitzammer defends fr. 27 as a wedding song, she notes that these words evoke the cosmic ladder that the Adonia proposed. This stairway to heaven reminded the women participating in the ritual that the attempts to climb to the realm of the gods would fail. Simultaneously, it made the revellers experience the ladder through the ritualized wedding scene, as they played the role of Aphrodite and the fellow mourners.Footnote 90 I believe that the verses are connected to the Adonia, as they indicate the human fear of meddling with divine matters. This is a common theme in Aphrodite’s unions. For example, attempting to fly to heaven and marrying the goddess appear in Alcman’s Louvre partheneion (fr. 1.16–17 PMGF), perhaps as an admonition against marrying above one’s station.Footnote 91 This is a recurring fear of Anchises in the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite. The hero begs for his life when he first sees Aphrodite in disguise (105–6), claims he will be ready to descend to Hades after sharing a bed with her (153–4), pleads for his life once he realizes who she was (185–90), and is only allowed to live if he conceals her identity (281–90). In Praxilla’s song for Adonis (fr. 747 PMG), the hero speaks from the underworld.Footnote 92 In Bion (94–6), the Moirai call Adonis back from the underworld, but he cannot return.Footnote 93 These testimonies demonstrate that Sappho not only referred to the limitations of human experience generally, but also foreshadowed the death of Aphrodite’s lover and his unavoidable descent to the underworld, the setting for fr. 140.
While fr. 27 evokes the setup of Adonis’ wedding and hints to its unfortunate outcome, fr. 30 focalizes another moment of the Adonia, specifically when the male youths are asked to join in the celebration.Footnote 94 It is night (1), girls have been singing (2–5) ‘of your love with the violet-girdled bride’ (σὰν ἀείδοισ[ι]ν φ[ιλότατα καὶ νύμφας ἰοκόλπω, 4–5), and ask their interlocutor to bring out youths of the same age as his (ἠϊθ[ε | … σοὶς ὐμάλικ[ας, 6–7) so that they can all see a night of little sleep (6–9). For an epithalamic reading, the addressee is a groom hymned in his wedding night,Footnote 95 and there is an assumption that a chorus of unmarried men (like the iuuenes of Catullus 62) will follow the girls’ song.Footnote 96 A pannychis, however, does not need to evoke a wedding.Footnote 97 Rather, this poem addresses Adonis himself, rather than a groom, and his lover is Aphrodite. Euripides dubs Adonis ‘the nearest and dearest’ [ὃς ἂν μάλιστα φίλτατος] of Aphrodite (Hipp. 1421), a nod to his relationship of φιλία with the goddess. The epithet used of the bride (ἰόκολπος, 5) confirms this. It is a rare word, attested mostly in Sappho.Footnote 98 It has an epic flair and, like other compounds formed by ἰός, is used to refer to deities, overwhelmingly the Muses, but also Dionysus, Persephone and Thetis.Footnote 99 In the Tithonus Song, the word refers to the Muses. Elsewhere (for example fr. 103.3–4) it points the audience to Aphrodite,Footnote 100 which should be the case here.Footnote 101
The night of celebration needs further explanation. It is true that this festival is frequently understood as a form of public self-expression for women,Footnote 102 but men are not absent from it. In Lysistrata, for example, Aristophanes remarks that the women celebrating the Adonia drink and indulge in paidia (‘amusements’), while Moschion in Menander’s Samia has sex with one of the women who celebrate it.Footnote 103 Furthermore, Burnett reminds us that the festival joined the women of the gynaikeion to the ones of the brothels, to celebrate Adonis’ introduction to adult sexuality in a relationship that is fruitless.Footnote 104 This makes one reconsider the role of men in this festival. Burnett argues that through Adonis the women lament and celebrate the men of society who reach sexual maturation and will have sexual relationships with women before the wedding is in sight.Footnote 105 Understood as such, this is a rite of passage for the men as well, as they left behind their boyhood, but were not yet at marriable age. As Sappho puts it, they are ἠίθεοι and the chorus calls Adonis to invite them to join the rite, not to sing epithalamia.
If the Lesbian Adonia, too, allowed the women of the gynaikeion to ‘act with the women in the brothels in defining this inaugural experience as extra-familial, unproductive and brief’,Footnote 106 fr. 30 can be connected to the moment before when the women bid farewell to the boyhood of their sons or brothers.Footnote 107 Then the boys would be stirred by Adonis (ἐγέρθεις ἠϊθ[ε] | στεῖχε σοὶς ὐμάλικ[ας, 6–7) to successfully transition into the heterosexual world. Sappho’s attack against the Egyptian courtesan, who has a love affair with her brother Charaxos,Footnote 108 and her prayers to Hera for him to return home and for Larichos to reach maturity and be ready for marriageFootnote 109 indicate that women had real anxieties surrounding this moment of the man’s life. Without the help of the women of the community, the young men could be lured by their desires instead of waiting to establish long-lasting relationships through marriage. The same festival, therefore, had distinct functions for the community. In the case of the men, it intended to guarantee a sexual maturation that did not interfere with their family lineage.Footnote 110 For the women, it allowed public expression of joy and grief that made them akin to Aphrodite. For fr. 30, one can envision glimpses of both, as the girls identified with (and singing about) Aphrodite interact with an Adonis figure who leads a group of young men.
In its final image, the boys, up all night, see less sleep than the cleared-voice [bird?]Footnote 111 (ἤπερ ὄσσον ἀ λιγύφω[νος] | ὔπνον [ἴ]δωμεν, 8–9). This has a parallel in the Iliad (19.340–54). As the Trojans grieve Patroclus’ untimely pre-marital death (like Adonis’), Zeus commiserates because Achilles refuses to eat. Then, Athena takes the shape of a loud-sounding bird of prey to soothe him (ἣ δ᾽ ἅρπῃ ἐϊκυῖα τανυπτέρυγι λιγυφώνῳ, 350). In Sappho’s case, the shrill bird is Aphrodite, whom the girls join in mourning as the wedding becomes a funeral. Just as Aphrodite becomes Sappho’s ally in fr. 1, her chorus suffers with and for the goddess. The healing nature of group grieving soothes the entire female community. The boys, in turn, presumably are up to celebrate their maturation. One wonders if this situation relates to Sappho’s complicated relationship to Phaon as preserved in her testimonia, which is presumably analogous to Aphrodite’s and Adonis’.Footnote 112
Taken together, frr. 27, 30, 140 and 168 offer an overarching view of the Adonia which has not been noticed before. Fr. 140 does not fit Book 1 metrically, but fr. 168 (ὦ τὸν Ἄδωνιν), not assigned to any book, could fit in it. One envisions a cluster of Adonis songs rather than epithalamia. Fr. 43, for instance, the end of Book 2, also evokes a pannychis, enacting an interaction between the poet and her companions at the end of a nightly celebration.Footnote 113 Perhaps the first two books highlighted Sappho’s ritual functions, not just the wedding. The Newest Sappho shows that Book 1 offered a succession of songs related to family relations, then participation in cult and, lastly, unrequited love.Footnote 114 It makes sense that the Adonia appears in this work. The cult joined these different attributions, as the rite cultivated the family and community, while the unrequited love of Aphrodite was akin to the impossible desires of the girls of the chorus. Just as Aphrodite caused pain to the singer in the Kypris song (formerly fr. 26), the goddess herself becomes a target of her own powers (again, just like in the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite, where she is pushed to unite to a mortal for imposing that to the other gods).
Beyond the symposium, the Adonia contributed to Sappho’s association with prostitution. As Schlesier notes, the character Laurensius in Athenaeus references a ‘comedy by Diphilus (Theseus fr. 49 PCG = 10.451b–c) in which three hetairai from Samos are posing, and obscenely solving, a riddle at a banquet during the Adonia—a further allusion to Sappho in whose work the first extant evocations of this festival occur’.Footnote 115 This may indicate that prostitutes participated in the Lesbian Adonia, making it close to the picture Burnett paints for Athens. At any rate, frr. 27 and 30 show that Sappho’s functions as a leader went much beyond preparing girls for their wedding. She helped them navigate a traditional society and understand their role in a community devoted to epiphanies, music, movement and beauty. Knowing both male and female codes, she was able to interfere in the male sphere as well: Lesbian women presented themselves publicly when specific rites called them to do so, while they respond to the events in the lives of the males in their community. This correlates to the Hellenistic understanding of Sappho’s poikilia:Footnote 116 generic variety (correlated to performative variety) reflects the true nature of her corpus, rather than being a feature later authors saw in her.Footnote 117 The brevity of her songs, another characteristic appreciated by the Alexandrians, means that clusters of songs were performed together. Their reperformance and the impositions of their edition now obscure their original context, causing some distortion. The reading of wedding songs beyond those of the Epithalamia is certainly a product of this process; the erasure of songs for Adonis, too.