Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T22:30:52.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Innate immunity and environmental correlates of Haemoproteus prevalence and intensity in an opportunistic breeder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2018

Elizabeth M. Schultz*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, California 95616, USA
Jamie M. Cornelius
Affiliation:
Eastern Michigan University, 900 Oakwood St, Ypsilanti, Michigan 48198, USA
Dustin G. Reichard
Affiliation:
Ohio Wesleyan University, 61 S Sandusky St, Delaware, Ohio 43015, USA
Kirk C. Klasing
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, California 95616, USA
Thomas P. Hahn
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave, Davis, California 95616, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Elizabeth M. Schultz, E-mail: emschultz9@gmail.com

Abstract

While parasite infection can have substantial fitness consequences in organisms, the predictors of parasite prevalence and intensity are often complex and vary depending on the host species. Here, we examined correlates of Haemoproteus (a common malaria parasite) prevalence and intensity in an opportunistically breeding songbird, the red crossbill (Loxia curvirostra). Specifically, we quantified Haemoproteus prevalence and intensity in crossbills caught in the Grand Teton National Park from 2010 to 2013. We found that parasite prevalence varies seasonally and across years, with the highest number of infected individuals occurring in the summer, although there was variation across summers sampled, and that prevalence was positively related to annual mean cone crop sizes (a measure of crossbill food abundance) and daily ambient temperature (a correlate of vector abundance). Parasite intensity was significantly and positively related to one measure of innate immunity, leucocyte counts per blood volume. Finally, neither crossbill age, ecomorph, nor sex had significant effects on parasite infection intensity; however, parasite prevalence did significantly vary among ecomorph and age classes. These results support the interpretation that a combination of physiological (specifically immune activity) and environmental factors affects parasite prevalence and infection intensity in this opportunistically breeding avian species.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 
Figure 0

Table 1. List of generalized linear and linear mixed models predicting Haemoproteus infection status (parasite prevalence) ranked in order of lowest to highest AICc score, grouped by model family

Figure 1

Table 2. Model estimates and 95% confidence intervals for top model predicting Haemoproteus infection status (parasite prevalence)

Figure 2

Table 3. Model estimates (A) and odds ratios (B) for top models predicting Haemoproteus infection status (parasite prevalence)

Figure 3

Table 4. List of generalized linear and linear mixed models predicting Haemoproteus infection intensity ranked in order of lowest to highest AICc score, grouped by model family

Figure 4

Table 5. Model estimates for averageda top models predicting Haemoproteus infection intensity

Figure 5

Fig. 1. Variation in parasite prevalence (% of individuals caught infected by Haemoproteus) by year (A) and by season (B). Numbers indicate total number of individuals scored per season for Haemoproteus.

Figure 6

Fig. 2. Inter (A) and (B) intra-annual variation in parasite intensity among infected individuals. Inter-annual variation in scores as indicated by blood samples collected between June 23–August 30, 2011 (summer 11), July 2–September 12, 2012 (summer 12) and July 6–August 10, 2013 (summer 13). Intra-annual variation in parasite density as indicated by blood samples collected between June 23–August 30, 2011 (summer 11), October 25–30, 2011 (fall 11), March 1–11, 2012 (winter 12) and May 3–9 2012 (spring 12). Bars indicate standard errors, numbers indicate sample size.

Figure 7

Fig. 3. Plot of best-fit line demonstrating relationship between Haemoproteus infection intensity (per cent erythrocytes infected) and leucocyte counts per blood volume. The black line represents the fitted relationship between the two variables in GLM model. The shaded grey represent the 95% confidence intervals around the predicted value. Model structure: infection intensity ~ leucocytes per blood volume, estimate: 0.89, 95% CI 0.07–1.71. No haematocrit data were collected from individuals caught in summer 2010.

Figure 8

Fig. 4. Daily and annual fluctuations in temperature (A) and cone crop scores (B). (A) The mean ±s.e.m. high and low temperature (°C) was the high and low temperature recorded the day of capture. Numbers indicate sample size. (B) Mean cone crop score by ‘cone year’, by conifer species in the Grand Teton National Park. s.e.m. calculated based on 20 cone surveys conducted in summer of the reported year. BS, Blue Spruce; DF, Douglas-fir; ES, Engelmann Spruce; LPP; Lodgepole pine.

Figure 9

Fig. 5. Variation in Haemoproteus prevalence by crossbill vocal type. Sample sizes and s.e.m. given. Vocal type 4 had significantly higher parasite prevalence than other vocal types (GLMM, type 4 estimate: 2.17, 95% CI 1.10–3.24).

Figure 10

Fig. 6. Variation in Haemoproteus prevalence by crossbill age. AHY, after hatch year; HY, hatch year. Sample sizes and s.e.m. given. HY birds had significantly lower parasite prevalence than AHY birds (GLMM, HY estimate: −1.30, 95% CI −2.10 to −0.50).

Figure 11

Fig. 7. (A) Total snow fall (±s.e.m. of months January 1–May 31 of the given year), (B) total snow depth (±s.e.m. of months January 1–May 31 of the given year), and (C) total precipitation (±s.e.m. of months January 1–May 31 of the given year). The year 2011 had significantly higher total precipitation in the months January through the end of May than other years; GLM: 2011 estimate: 4.11 95% CI 1.99–6.24.