Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:16:28.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In situ and operando transmissionelectron microscopy of catalytic materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2015

Peter A. Crozier
Affiliation:
School of Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, USA; crozier@asu.edu
Thomas W. Hansen
Affiliation:
Center for Electron Nanoscopy, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark; twh@cen.dtu.dk

Abstract

Catalytic nanomaterials play a major role in chemical conversions and energytransformations. Understanding how materials control and regulate surfacereactions is a major objective for fundamental research on heterogeneouscatalysts. In situ environmental transmission electronmicroscopy (ETEM) is a powerful technique for revealing the atomic structures ofmaterials at elevated temperatures in the presence of reactive gases. Thisapproach can allow the structure–reactivity relations underlyingcatalyst functionality to be investigated. Thus far, ETEM has been limited bythe absence of in situ measurements of gas-phase catalyticproducts. To overcome this deficiency, operando TEM techniquesare being developed that combine atomic characterization with the simultaneousmeasurement of catalytic products. This article provides a short review of thecurrent status and major developments in the application of ETEM to gas-phasecatalysis over the past 10 years.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Boron nitride (BN) supported ruthenium particles.3 (a) In a vacuum, the BN support creates shells encapsulating the metal particles. (b) When exposed to a reactive environment of N2 and H2 at 552°C, the shells are removed. Reproduced with permission from Reference 3. © 2001 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Schematic diagram of a microelectromechanical systems-based windowed cell reactor.12 (b) Schematic diagram of a differentially pumped environmental transmission electron microscopy apparatus.16 Note: CCD, charge-coupled device; FEG, field-emission gun; IGP, ion getter pump; PC, plasma cleaner; RGA, residual gas analyzer; SA, selected-area aperture; TMP, turbomolecular pump.

Figure 2

Figure 3. In situ reduction and reoxidation of a Ni/yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) fuel-cell anode:28 (a) initial structure composed of NiO/YSZ, (b) fully reduced anode showing porous Ni metal regions, and (c) reoxidized anode showing formation of porous NiO regions and a bend contour in YSZ, indicative of strain. Insets are electron diffraction patterns and an Ni elemental map. Reproduced with permission from Reference 28. © 2010 Elsevier Limited.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Gold nanoparticles supported on cerium oxide in (a) a vacuum and (b) a mixture of CO and air.32 The middle and bottom rows show magnified images of the facets labeled I and II, respectively. When exposed to the CO gas mixture, the top-most Au layer on the {100} facets (indicated by white rectangles, top row) expands by 0.05 nm (middle and bottom rows). Reproduced with permission from Reference 32. © 2012 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Figure 4

Figure 5. In situ environmental transmission electron microscope images and electron diffraction patterns of Ni/SiO2: (a) in the presence of 1.5 mbar of H2 at 400°C and (b) from the same region in the presence of 1.5 mbar of a mixture of CH4 and O2 in a 2:1 ratio at 400°C. (c) Structure–reactivity relations showing schematic diagrams of catalyst structure superimposed on catalytic data. The catalytic data show O2 and CH4 conversion along with selectivities for CO and CO2.33 Reproduced with permission from Reference 33. © 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH&Co, KGaA, Weinheim.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Dynamic changes in atomic-level structure characterized by (top) high-resolution imaging, (middle) electron diffraction, and (bottom) oxidation-state change determined by electron energy-loss spectroscopy at (a) 245°C, (b) 693°C, and (c) 600°C in 1 mbar of H2 along the $\left[ {21\bar 1} \right]$ zone axis from the same individual CeO2 nanoparticle during a redox cycle. After reduction (b), the arrows in the high-resolution image show the new periodicity, and the extra spots along the (220) plane in the electron diffraction pattern also show the superstructure formed during reduction.38

Figure 6

Figure 7. Atomic-scale visualization of dynamic refaceting of a Pt nanoparticle during oscillatory CO oxidation.53 The Pt particle is viewed along the $\left[ {\bar 110} \right]$ zone axis (ZA) with a (111) spacing d of 2.3 Å, and the area enclosed with the black rectangle is shown at higher magnification in (c–e). The particles show a (a, c, e) rounded or (b, d) more faceted shape as the CO conversion oscillates. Reproduced with permission from Reference 53. © 2014 Nature Publishing Group.

Figure 7

Figure 8. (a) Electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) carbon K-edge from the gas phase recorded as a function of temperature from a CO oxidation operando experiment with a glass fiber pellet.54 (b) Results from a CO oxidation experiment in which a Ru–RuO2 catalyst was heated from room temperature to 460°C and then cooled to 100°C in CO and O2. Inset: High-resolution images recorded at different points in the heating and cooling cycle. The initial RuO2 converts to hcp Ru metal at around 500°C, giving a much more active form of the catalyst.57 Reproduced with permission from References 54 and 57. © 2013 Cambridge University Press.