Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:08:49.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physicochemical properties and nutritional quality of raw cereals for newly weaned piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2008

G. A. White
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK
F. J. Doucet
Affiliation:
Division of Food Sciences, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK
S. E. Hill*
Affiliation:
Division of Food Sciences, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK
J. Wiseman
Affiliation:
Division of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, School of Biosciences, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, UK

Abstract

The digestibility of the starch component of raw cereals in newly weaned piglets is highly variable. Reasons for this must be elucidated if the most suitable cereals are to be used. A novel approach was employed, which consisted of assessing the physicochemical properties (rapid visco analysis, water absorption and solubility indices, particle size distribution and in vitro amylolytic digestion) of eight raw cereals contained within piglet diets and subsequently relating this in vitro data to the biological responses of weaned piglets. Trial 1 examined soft and hard wheat, trial 2 – soft wheat, barley, rye and triticale, and trial 3 – soft wheat, naked oats, whole oats and maize. The initial observation was that in vitro testing prior to animal trials is recommended in nutritional evaluation since it indicated fundamental differences between raw cereals, such as for example the levels of endogenous amylase in wheat. Starch and nitrogen digestibility differed between cereals (apparent digestibility coefficients at the 0.5 site of the small intestine ranged from 0.10 to 0.69 for starch and from 0.17 to 0.68 for nitrogen). There is also a probable relationship between the coefficients of ileal apparent starch digestibility, at approximately halfway from the gastric pylorus to the ileocaecal valve, and the presence of endogenous amylase (mean values of 0.53 and 0.62 in trials 2 and 3, respectively, for the higher amylase wheat; 0.38 for the low-amylase wheat used in trial 1). This additional variable (i.e. the unforeseen presence of endogenous amylase) in wheat made it more difficult to draw a firm conclusion about the nutritional suitability of the different cereals. All raw-cereal diets caused atrophy of the villi during the initial week following weaning, but the soft wheat was associated with the highest comparative villi height and might therefore be considered the best of all raw cereals in minimising the post-weaning growth check. For wheat, this might also suggest a possible interaction between villus architecture and endosperm texture in the immediate post-weaning period.

Information

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008
Figure 0

Table 1 Diet specification (experimental diets) in trials 1, 2 and 3

Figure 1

Table 2 Performance parameters and intestinal measurements (mean and standard error of difference (s.e.d) for 10 pigs per diet) of piglets in trial 1, where the raw cereal component was either hard (HW) or soft (SW) wheat†

Figure 2

Figure 1 Effect of endosperm texture of raw wheat on mean villus height measurements of piglets during the first 14 days post weaning (n = 10 piglets per diet; open circle: hard endosperm; closed circle: soft endosperm).

Figure 3

Table 3 Performance parameters and intestinal measurements (mean and standard error of difference (s.e.d.) for 10 pigs per diet) of piglets in trial 2, where the raw cereal components were: soft wheat (Dw1), barley (DB), rye (DR), or triticale (DT)†

Figure 4

Table 4 Performance parameters and intestinal measurements (mean and standard error (s.e.) for 10 pigs per diet) of piglets in trial 3, where the raw cereal components were: soft wheat (Dw1), naked oats (DNO), whole oats (DWO) or maize (DM)†

Figure 5

Figure 2 Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) pasting profiles showing the temperatures and the viscosity of the pasted materials used in trial 1: (a) raw hard and soft wheat flours (10.7% dry flower in distilled water w/w) and (b) their corresponding complete diets (18.5% w/w).

Figure 6

Table 5 Proximate analysis of raw hard and soft wheats used in trial 1

Figure 7

Figure 3 Particle size distribution of the milled hard and soft wheats used in trial 1.

Figure 8

Figure 4 In vitro digestibility, as measured by enzymic release of glucose from the hard (closed circles) and soft (open circles) wheat flours used in trial 1.

Figure 9

Figure 5 Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) pasting profiles of raw cereal flours used in trials 2 and 3 (10.7% dry flour in distilled water w/w) (a. rye; b. soft wheat; c. triticale; d. barley; e. whole oats; f. maize; g. naked oats).

Figure 10

Figure 6 Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) pasting profiles of cereal diets used in trials 2 and 3 (18.5% dry diet in distilled water w/w) (1. rye; 2. soft wheat; 3. triticale; 4. barley; 5. whole oats; 6. maize; 7. naked oats. *Indicates artefacts).

Figure 11

Figure 7 Differences in (a) the water absorption indices (WAI) and (b) the water solubility indices (WSI) between (1) cereals and (2) diets used in trials 2 and 3.

Figure 12

Figure 8 Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) pasting profiles of (a) soft wheat used in trial 1 (in water), (b) soft wheat used in trials 2 and 3 (in water) and (c) soft wheat used in trials 2 and 3 (in AgNO3 solution).

Figure 13

Figure 9 Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) pasting profiles of the cereal flours (a. rye; b. triticale; c. barley; d. whole oats; e. maize; f. naked oats) in the absence (A) and in the presence (B) of silver nitrate.

Figure 14

Table 6 Endogenous amylase activity in tested cereals