Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T10:34:05.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SECULAR GROWTH AND MATURATION CHANGES IN HUNGARY IN RELATION TO SOCIOECONOMIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2015

Eva B. Bodzsar
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Anthropology, Eotvos Lorand University Budapest, Hungary
Annamaria Zsakai*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Anthropology, Eotvos Lorand University Budapest, Hungary
Nicholas Mascie-Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
*
1 Corresponding author. Email: zsakaia@elte.hu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper analyses the secular changes in the body development patterns of Hungarian children between the 1910s and the beginning of the 2000s in relation to socioeconomic and demographic changes in the country. Individual growth data of children were available from two national growth studies (1983–86, 2003–06), while sample-size weighted means of children’s body dimensions were collected through regional studies between the 1920s and 1970s. Gross domestic product, Gini index, life expectancy at birth and under-5 mortality rate were used to assess the changes in economic status, income inequalities of the society and the population’s general health status, respectively. Secular changes in food consumption habits were also examined. The positive Hungarian secular changes in socioeconomic status were associated with a continuous increase in children’s body dimensions. The negative socioeconomic changes reflected only in wartime and post-war periods of children’s growth, and the considerable socioeconomic changes at the beginning of the 1990s did not appear to influence the positive trend in children’s growth. The positive secular trend in stature and body mass did not level off at the beginning of the 2000s: the socioeconomic conditions that support optimal growth and maturation could improve in Hungary.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press, 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1GDP per capita in US$ in Hungary between 1961 and 2012 (source: Trading Economics, 2013).

Figure 1

Fig. 2Gini index in Hungary between 1964 and 2012 (source: European Commission, 2013).

Figure 2

Fig. 3Child mortality (under-5 mortality) per 10,000 live births in Hungary between 1913 and 2007 (sources: Mitchell, 2000; Hungarian Central Statistical Office, 2012).

Figure 3

Fig. 4Life expectancy at birth in Hungary between 1923 and 2012 (sources: Kincses, 2004; Hungarian Central Statistical Office, 2012).

Figure 4

Fig. 5Food consumption trend in Hungary between 1926 and 2011. Consumption is expressed in kg/person/year with the exception of egg, which is expressed in pieces/person/year (right-hand y-axis); vegetables and fruit consumption excludes potato consumption (sources: Manyi & Goro, 1996; Hungarian Central Statistical Office, 2013).

Figure 5

Fig. 6Mean stature (cm) of Hungarian children (data until the 1970s were estimated by Eiben & Panto, 1986).

Figure 6

Table 1Secular changes in stature (cm) of boys (B) and girls (G) in Hungary between the 1920s and the beginning of the 2000s

Figure 7

Fig. 7Mean body mass (kg) of Hungarian children (data until the 1970s were estimated by Eiben & Panto, 1986).

Figure 8

Table 2Secular changes in body mass (kg) of boys (B) and girls (G) in Hungary between the 1920s and the beginning of the 2000s

Figure 9

Fig. 8Mean body mass index (kg/m2) of Hungarian children. Since the BMI curves between the age of 3 and 5 years cross each other in this interval, these are shown individually: 3, ●; 4, ∆; 5, □. Data until the 1970s were estimated by Eiben & Panto (1986).

Figure 10

Table 3Secular changes in body mass index (kg/m2) of boys (B) and girls (G) in Hungary between the 1920s and the beginning of the 2000s

Figure 11

Fig. 9Menarcheal and spermarcheal age in Hungary (sources: Frigyesi, 1948; Fekete, 1955; Bottyan et al., 1959–61; Eiben et al., 1983–86; all cited by Bodzsar, 1998).