Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T15:32:58.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Listening to the Kids: The Value of Childhood Palaeopathology for the Study of Rural Roman Britain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2017

Anna Rohnbogner*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Readinga.j.rohnbogner@reading.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Childhood palaeopathology remains an underutilised resource in the study of Roman Britain, particularly for exploring the lives of the rural population. Lesions in child skeletons provide unique insights into past lifeways and population health, as adverse environmental conditions translate more readily into the osteological record of these vulnerable members of society. To demonstrate the range of information gleaned from the children, 1,279 non-adults (0–17 years) from 26 first- to fifth-century urban and rural settlements were analysed, comparing morbidity and mortality in the most comprehensive study to date. The distribution of ages-at-death suggests migration between country and town, the latter presenting a stressful and unsanitary environment. However, as demonstrated by high rates of metabolic disease and infections, life in the countryside was hampered by demanding physical labour and potentially oppressive conditions with restricted access to resources.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017. Published by The Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Map of sites with non-adult remains included in survey.

Major urban: 1. York; 2. Leicester; 3. Gloucester; 4. Cirencester; 5. Colchester; 6. London; 7. Winchester. Minor urban: 8. Ancaster; 9. Great Casterton; 10. Ashton; 11. Chesterton; 12. Baldock; 13. Dunstable; 14. Queenford Farm/Queensford Mill; 15. Springhead. Rural: 16. Bantycock Mine; 17. Watersmeet; 18. Huntsman's Quarry; 19. Babraham Institute; 20. Frocester; 21. Cannington; 22. Bradley Hill; 23. Catsgore; 24. Owslebury; 25. Dorchester By-pass; 26. Dewlish.
Figure 1

TABLE 1. INDIVIDUAL SITE ASSEMBLAGE DETAILS

Figure 2

FIG. 2. Percentage distribution of ages-at-death.

Figure 3

TABLE 2. AGES-AT-DEATH OF NON-ADULTS FROM MAJOR URBAN, MINOR URBAN AND RURAL SETTLEMENTS OF ROMAN ENGLAND

Figure 4

FIG. 3. Overview of percentage distributions of pathological lesions (CO: cribra orbitalia, PH: porotic hyperostosis, EL: endocranial lesions, SPNBF: sub-periosteal new bone formation).

Figure 5

TABLE 3. NUMBER AND PERCENT OVERVIEW OF NON-ADULT PATHOLOGY BY LESION

Figure 6

FIG. 4. Percentage distribution of haematopoietic lesions by age group.

Figure 7

TABLE 4. NUMBER AND PERCENT OF HAEMATOPOIETIC SKELETAL LESIONS (CRIBRA ORBITALIA AND POROTIC HYPEROSTOSIS)

Figure 8

FIG. 5. Percentage distribution of enamel hypoplasia by age group.

Figure 9

FIG. 6. Percentage distribution of sub-periosteal new bone formation and endocranial lesions by age group.

Figure 10

TABLE 5. NUMBER AND PERCENT OF CRUDE PREVALENCE RATES OF ENAMEL HYPOPLASIA

Figure 11

TABLE 6. NUMBER AND PERCENT OF LESIONS INDICATIVE OF INFLAMMATION/INFECTION (SUB-PERIOSTEAL NEW BONE FORMATION, ENDOCRANIAL LESIONS)

Figure 12

FIG. 7. Percentage distribution of vitamin D deficiency by age group.

Figure 13

TABLE 7. NUMBER AND PERCENT OF VITAMIN D AND C DEFICIENCIES

Figure 14

FIG. 8. Percentage distribution of vitamin C deficiency by age group.

Figure 15

FIG. 9. Distribution of fracture locations by settlement type. Template adapted from Roksandic (2003, fig. 2).

Figure 16

TABLE 8. NUMBER AND PERCENT OF TRAUMA

Figure 17

TABLE 9. FRACTURE SITES BY SKELETAL ELEMENT

Figure 18

FIG. 10. Digital radiograph of right clavicle with healed fracture (top) at the mid-shaft. Bottom is left clavicle for comparison. From Queensford Farm/Mill, skeleton 51/232. (With permission from Oxfordshire Museums Service)

Figure 19

FIG. 11. Right: left humerus with fracture at the mid-shaft, resulting in prominent angulation and changes to the proximal and distal epiphyseal ends. Left: right humerus for comparison. From Butt Road, Colchester, skeleton 595. (With permission from Colchester and Ipswich Museums)

Figure 20

FIG. 12. Infant left rib with fracture callus. From Winchester (Victoria Road East cemetery), skeleton 444. (With permission from Hampshire Cultural Trust)