Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T08:32:45.997Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multiple phase formation and its influence on lattice thermal conductivity in β-Zn4Sb3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2011

Titus Dasgupta*
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), D-51170Cologne, Germany
Christian Stiewe
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), D-51170Cologne, Germany
Lothar Boettcher
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), D-51170Cologne, Germany
Ralf Hassdorf
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), D-51170Cologne, Germany
Hao Yin
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and iNANO, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
Bo Iversen
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and iNANO, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 140, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
Eckhard Mueller
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials Research, German Aerospace Center (DLR), D-51170Cologne, Germany
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: titas.dasgupta@dlr.de

Abstract

The extremely low thermal conductivity (κ) coupled with suitable Seebeck (S) and electrical conductivity (σ) values makes β-Zn4Sb3 a promising candidate for intermediate temperature (200–400 °C) thermogenerator applications. However, the poor thermal stability makes it difficult to reproduce the high thermoelectric figure of merit originally reported for this material.1 Using a combination of surface scanning techniques (Potential Seebeck microprobe, electron backscatter diffraction, and x-ray diffraction), we investigate specimens of β-Zn4Sb3 prepared under different synthesis conditions. Our results indicate the presence of multiple phases of Zn4Sb3 with distinct room temperature S values ranging from 70 to 140 μV/K. Though crystallographically similar, these phases have very different lattice contribution to the thermal conductivity (κL), which vary between 0.45 and 1.0 W/mK and might predominantly reflect the degree of Zn disorder among the different phases.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

TABLE I.List of the different parameters used for compaction.

Figure 1

FIG. 1.Potential Seebeck microprobe (PSM) scans along the cross section of the different specimens. The specimen numbers are same as that given in Table I.

Figure 2

FIG. 2.Frequency distribution of the S values for the different specimens. The PSM scans for specimens 1 and 8 are included to show the difference in the absolute S values.

Figure 3

FIG. 3.PSM scan and frequency distribution plot in a compacted Zn4Sb3 specimen.10 An interpenetrating Seebeck microstructure is observed from the PSM scan. The resultant frequency distribution shows multiple close by features (maxima and smeared side-maxima forming shoulders) indicative of the different β-Zn4Sb3 subphases.

Figure 4

FIG. 4.X-ray diffraction (XRD) of the different specimens. *, ZnSb phase; Δ, zinc. PSM scans of specimens 4 and 8 are included. In specimen 4, the region corresponding to the ZnSb phase is encircled. A comparison of the XRD peak position in samples 5, 6, and 7 is also given to highlight the minor differences in 2θ positions, relative peak intensities, and the peak broadening.

Figure 5

FIG. 5.Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) phase maps for specimens 1 and 4. The PSM scans along with the regions where the EBSD imaging were performed are indicated.

Figure 6

FIG. 6.κL values as a function of temperature in different specimens. Majority phases in samples are as follows: sample 1, β-Zn4Sb3; sample 2, Zn-depleted β-Zn4Sb3 subphases; sample 6, β-Zn4Sb3; sample 7, Zn-depleted β-Zn4Sb3 subphases; and sample 8, Klevtsova phase.

Figure 7

TABLE II.List of the atomic positional parameters (x,y,z) and the site occupancies (F) for (a) β-Zn4Sb3 phase2 and (b) Klevtsova phase.13