Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-zsp5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T22:22:40.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sensitivity of lake freeze-up and break-up to climate change: a physically based modeling study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Dorothy K. Hall
Affiliation:
Hydrological Sciences Branch, NASA\Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 974, Greenbelt, MD 20771, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To assess the response of lake Freeze-up and break-up dates to changes in atmospheric forcing, a physically based computational model of the coupled lake, lake-ice, snow and atmosphere system has been developed. Model performance is validated using meteorological and lake-ice observations from Great Slave Lake in northern Canada (1991/92) and St Mary Lake in Glacier National Park, Montana, (1992/93). Model integrations with modified atmospheric forcing indicate that air-temperature changes of ±4°C can delay or speed up the freeze-up and break-up dates by as much as 4 weeks for St Mary Lake, and 2 weeks for Great Slave Lake. For both lakes, break-up date is more sensitive to air-temperature changes than is freeze-up. Changes of ±3/10 cloud-cover fraction produce a shifting of break-tip dates by 1 week. Changes in wind speeds of ± 3 m s−1 modify the maximum ice depth of the lakes by 5–10 cm. For Great Slave Lake, lower wind speeds produced a surface temperature low enough to delay the onset of break-up by 2 weeks.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1995
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Schematic illustration of key features of the lake-ice growth model and a representative temperature profile.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.Comparision between the ice and snow depths simulated by the model and the observations for: a. St Mary Lake. b. Great Slave Lake.

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Ice depth variations for St Mary Lake in response to changes in: a. air temperature, b. wind speed, c. cloud-cover fraction.

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Ice depth variations for Great Slave Lake in response to changes in: a. air temperature, b. wind speed, c. cloud-cover fraction.