Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T18:24:13.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Periconception maternal low-protein diet adversely affects male mouse fetal bone growth and mineral density quality in late gestation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2020

Stuart A. Lanham
Affiliation:
Bone and Joint Research Group, Human Development and Health, Institute of Developmental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
Stephanie J. Smith
Affiliation:
Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
Adam J. Watkins
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Division of Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
Emma S. Lucas
Affiliation:
Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
Niamh MacCaoilte
Affiliation:
Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
Richard O.C. Oreffo
Affiliation:
Bone and Joint Research Group, Human Development and Health, Institute of Developmental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
Tom P. Fleming
Affiliation:
Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
Judith J. Eckert*
Affiliation:
Human Development and Health, Institute of Developmental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Judith J. Eckert, MP887, Institute of Developmental Sciences, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road SO16 6YD, UK. Email: jje@soton.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adverse programming of adult non-communicable disease can be induced by poor maternal nutrition during pregnancy and the periconception period has been identified as a vulnerable period. In the current study, we used a mouse maternal low-protein diet fed either for the duration of pregnancy (LPD) or exclusively during the preimplantation period (Emb-LPD) with control nutrition provided thereafter and postnatally to investigate effects on fetal bone development and quality. This model has been shown previously to induce cardiometabolic and neurological disease phenotypes in offspring. Micro 3D computed tomography examination at fetal stages Embryonic day E14.5 and E17.4, reflecting early and late stages of bone formation, demonstrated LPD treatment caused increased bone formation of relative high mineral density quality in males, but not females, at E14.5, disproportionate to fetal growth, with bone quality maintained at E17.5. In contrast, Emb-LPD caused a late increase in male fetal bone growth, proportionate to fetal growth, at E17.5, affecting central and peripheral skeleton and of reduced mineral density quality relative to controls. These altered dynamics in bone growth coincide with increased placental efficiency indicating compensatory responses to dietary treatments. Overall, our data show fetal bone formation and mineral quality is dependent upon maternal nutritional protein content and is sex-specific. In particular, we find the duration and timing of poor maternal diet to be critical in the outcomes with periconceptional protein restriction leading to male offspring with increased bone growth but of poor mineral density, thereby susceptible to later disease risk.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2020
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Effect of maternal diets on fetal bone growth at E14.5 with error bars shown as SEM and with P values at significant and trend level indicated between treatments. (a) Total bone volume is increased in both male and female LPD fetuses. (b) Representative µCT images of control, Emb-LPD and LPD skeletons (all males), at E14.5, the main bone formed is the clavicle (arrowed) while ribs have also partially formed in the more advanced LPD fetus. (c) Total bone volume ratio to fetal mass, placental mass and yolk sac mass showing disproportionate growth and increased placental and yolk sac efficiency of male and female LPD fetuses versus controls. (d) Correlation between total bone volume and fetal mass showing the increased bone growth evident in LPD fetuses. For all graphs for each sex, n = 14–24 from 10 to 13 different mothers per treatment.

Figure 1

Table 1. Masses (g) and ratios of different parts of the conceptus at E14.5 or E17.5 of gestation exposed to maternal diets during pregnancy

Figure 2

Table 2. Correlation between bone volume and conceptus masses at E14.5 or E17.5 of gestation exposed to maternal diets during pregnancy

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Effect of maternal diets on individual bone growth and mineral density quality at E14.5 with error bars shown as SEM and with P values at significant and trend level indicated between treatments. (a) Clavicle bone volume is increased in male but not female LPD fetuses. (b) Clavicle normalised low- and high-density bone volumes and low/high-density bone volume ratio showing reduced low and increased high-density bone volume and reduced low/high-density ratio in male and female LPD fetuses. (c) Clavicle bone volume ratio to fetal and placental masses indicating increased bone growth and placental efficiency in male but not female LPD fetuses. (d) Number of calcified ribs is increased in male but not female LPD fetuses. For all graphs for each sex, n = 14–24 from 10 to 13 different mothers per treatment.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Effect of maternal diets on bone growth and mineral density quality at E17.5 with error bars shown as SEM and with P values at significant and trend level indicated between treatments. (a) Total bone volume is increased as a mean but not significantly in male and female Emb-LPD fetuses versus controls (for each sex, n = 9–10 each from 9 to 10 different mothers, per treatment). (b) Representative µCT images of control, Emb-LPD and LPD skeletons (all males), at E17.5 bone formation is well advanced and main central and peripheral bones are indicated. (c) Total bone volume ratio is positively correlated with fetal mass for all treatments (for each sex, n = 9–10 from 9 to 10 different mothers per treatment). (d) Whole skeleton normalised low- and high-density bone volumes and low/high-density bone volume ratio showing reduced high-density bone volume and increased low/high-density ratio in male but not female Emb-LPD fetuses versus controls (for each sex, n = 8–10 from 8 to 10 different mothers, per treatment). (e) High-density bone volume ratio to fetal and placental mass showing a reduced high-density bone volume to fetal mass rato in male but not female Emb-LPD fetuses (for each sex, n = 8–10 from 8 to 10 different mothers per treatment).

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Effect of maternal diets on individual bone growth and mineral density quality at E17.5 with error bars shown as SEM and with P values at significant and trend level indicated between treatments. (a) Lumbar vertebra normalised low- and high-density bone volumes and low/high-density bone volume ratio showing increased low and reduced high-density bone volumes (trend level) and increased low/high-density ratio in male but not female Emb-LPD fetuses versus controls. (b) Humerus normalised low- and high-density bone volumes and low/high-density bone volume ratio showing reduced high-density bone volumes and increased low/high-density ratio in male but not female Emb-LPD fetuses versus controls. (c) Clavicle normalised low- and high-density bone volumes and low/high-density bone volume ratio across treatments showing no significant differences. For all graphs, for each sex, n = 8–10 each from 8 to 10 different mothers per treatment.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Effect of maternal diets on developmental index of front right paw and tail vertebrae at E17.5 with error bars shown as SEM and with P values at significant and trend level indicated between treatments. (a) Representative µCT images of front paw developmental index scores of 1–3 (left) and scores across treatments (right) showing increased score in both male and female Emb-LPD fetuses. (b) Representative µCT images of tail vertebra developmental index scores of 5–7 (left) and scores across treatments (right) showing increased score in total and female Emb-LPD fetuses. For all graphs, for each sex, n = 9–10 from 9 to 10 different mothers per treatment.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Histological analysis of humerus within mid-longitudinal sections of female fetal forelimbs at E17.5. Error bars are shown as SEM and with P values at significant and trend level indicated between treatments (n = 5–8 each from 5 to 8 different mothers per treatment). (a–c) Representative micrograph images of Haematoxylin/eosin (a), Alcian blue (cartilage) (b) and Alizarin red (mineral) (c) stained samples showing upper and lower Alcian blue and central Alizarin red domains within the humerus. (d–k) Area and staining pattern proportions of humerus comprising total area (d), length (e), area/length (f), % Alcian blue of total area (g), % upper Alcian blue of total area (h), % lower Alcian blue of total area (i), lower/upper Alcian blue area ration (j), and % Alizarin red of total area (k). Control samples have an increased area and area/length ratio versus Emb-LPD and LPD samples. Scale bar = 2 mm.