Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T02:18:45.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variability of vestibular aqueduct measurements among axial, single-oblique and double-oblique computed tomography images

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2018

Y Quan
Affiliation:
CT room, Shanxian Central Hospital, affiliated with Jining Medical College, Heze, PR China
X J Gao
Affiliation:
Center of Laboratory Medicine, Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, PR China
J Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Weihai Central Hospital, affiliated with Weifang Medical College, Weihai, PR China
R Z Gong*
Affiliation:
Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, PR China
Q Wang
Affiliation:
CT room, Shanxian Central Hospital, affiliated with Jining Medical College, Heze, PR China
H Liang
Affiliation:
CT room, Shanxian Central Hospital, affiliated with Jining Medical College, Heze, PR China
J L Fu
Affiliation:
CT room, Shanxian Central Hospital, affiliated with Jining Medical College, Heze, PR China
Q Cheng
Affiliation:
CT room, Shanxian Central Hospital, affiliated with Jining Medical College, Heze, PR China
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Ruozhen Gong, Shandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Shandong University, No. 324, Jingwu Road, Jinan, Shandong 250021, PR China E-mail: 2665709947@qq.com Fax: +86 530 469 1777
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the morphology and dimensions of the vestibular aqueduct on axial, single-oblique and double-oblique computed tomography images.

Methods

The computed tomography temporal bone scans of 112 patients were retrospectively evaluated. Midpoint and opercular measurements were performed using axial, single-oblique and double-oblique images. Morphometric analyses were also conducted. The vestibular aqueduct sizes on axial, single-oblique and double-oblique images were compared.

Results

At the midpoint, the mean (± standard deviation) vestibular aqueduct measured 0.61 ± 0.23 mm, 0.74 ± 0.27 mm and 0.82 ± 0.38 mm on axial, single-oblique and double-oblique images, respectively; at the operculum, the vestibular aqueduct measured 0.91 ± 0.30 mm, 1.11 ± 0.45 mm and 1.66 ± 1.07 mm on the respective images. The co-efficients of variation of the vestibular aqueduct measured at the midpoint were 37.4 per cent, 36.5 per cent and 47.5 per cent on axial, single-oblique and double-oblique images, respectively; at the operculum, the measurements were 33.0 per cent, 40.5 per cent and 64.5 per cent. Regarding morphology, the vestibular aqueduct was fissured (33.5 per cent), tubular (64.3 per cent) or invisible (2.2 per cent).

Conclusion

The morphology and dimensions of the vestibular aqueduct were highly variable among axial, single-oblique and double-oblique images.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Single-oblique and double-oblique images of the vestibular aqueduct. (a) Orthogonal axial reference image shows the reconstruction of the single-oblique image (white line) through the midpoint of the vestibular aqueduct. (b) Single-oblique image shows the reconstruction of the double-oblique image (white line) through the vestibular aqueduct. (c) Double-oblique image depicts normal anatomy of the vestibular aqueduct (arrow). The vestibular aqueduct was considered fissured because it was funnel-shaped in the double-oblique image, but tubular in the axial and single-oblique images.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The midpoint widths of the vestibular aqueduct are defined as the part of the vestibular aqueduct located half the distance in the petrous bone from its origin in the labyrinth to its aperture in the epidural space. The posterior wall of vestibule, or crus commune, was used in place of the origin of a normal aqueduct if it was invisible. The midpoint was measured on the image in which the width was largest.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. The opercular widths of the vestibular aqueduct are measured by drawing a line from the opercular edge anterolaterally to form a 90° angle with the posterior wall of the petrous bone.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. The vestibular aqueduct was considered tubular because it was shaped like a tube in all of the (a) axial, (b) single-oblique and (c) double-oblique images.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Box plots show the size of the (a) midpoint and (b) operculum measured in the axial, single-oblique and double-oblique images. The boundaries of the box plots indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the whiskers indicate the minimum and maximum (range) of all values. The line within each box indicates the median. Vestibular aqueduct size was compared between the two groups using the Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. VA = vestibular aqueduct

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Scatter dot plot for the size of the (a) midpoint and (b) operculum of 224 ears measured in the axial, single-oblique and double-oblique images. The middle line within each cluster of dots indicates the mean. The lines above and below indicate the mean ± standard deviation. ‘+’ indicates the value of the size of the (a) midpoint and (b) operculum. Vestibular aqueduct size was compared between the two groups using the Mann–Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction. VA = vestibular aqueduct

Figure 6

Table 1. Vestibular aqueduct size at midpoint and operculum, on axial, single-oblique and double-oblique images*

Figure 7

Table 2. Co-efficients of variation for measurements obtained on each image type

Figure 8

Table 3. Intraclass correlation co-efficients for vestibular aqueduct measurements, for each image type

Figure 9

Table 4. Numbers of vestibular aqueducts of each morphological type, on axial, single-oblique and double-oblique images

Figure 10

Table 5. Numbers of vestibular aqueducts according to gross morphology on CT images