Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-th4rj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T12:40:44.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perforation effects on the wake dynamics of normal flat plates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2022

Abhinav Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
Vagesh D. Narasimhamurthy*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036, India
*
†Email address for correspondence: vagesh@iitm.ac.in

Abstract

The effect of perforation on the wake of a thin flat plate placed normal to the free stream at Reynolds number ($Re$) 250 (based on plate width $d$, and inflow velocity $U_o$) is studied by means of direct numerical simulation. The perforated plate of length $6d$ consist of six equidistant square holes of varying sizes corresponding to porosity $\beta$ (ratio of open area to total plate area) of 0 %, 4 %, 9 %, 12.25 %, 16 %, 20.25 % and 25 %. It is observed that the bleed or jet flow through perforations pushes the shear layer interaction farther downstream with increasing $\beta$. This causes a monotonic decrease in the drag coefficient with increasing porosity, and a sharp fall seeming to begin at $\beta \approx 4\,\%$. On the other hand, the Strouhal number increases with $\beta$ up to 16 % (at $\beta =16\,\%$, loss of flow three-dimensionality leads to a ‘quasi-laminar’ state of flow). This is followed by a sharp fall in the Strouhal number at $\beta \approx 20\,\%$. The behaviour of the large-scale vortical structures in the far wake is influenced by the near-wake behaviour of the bleed flow, where the local $Re$ based on the perforation hole size determines the overall flow three-dimensionality. It is also observed that the jet or bleed flow undergoes meandering instability when pitch separation is equivalent to the hole size (at $\beta =25\,\%$). The low-$Re$ turbulent flow for a non-perforated plate is altered to a transitional state by the presence of perforation. The streamwise vortex pairs (secondary instabilities) become fairly organized as $\beta$ is increased from 0 % to 16 %. The secondary instability at $\beta =16\,\%$ appears similar to mode-B with wavelength ${\approx }1d$. On the contrary, the secondary instability at $\beta =25\,\%$ appears similar to mode-A with a wavelength of ${\approx }2d$.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Table 1.Flow over various perforated bodies. Here, superscripts $^a$ and $^b$ refer to $Re$ based on hole and Taylor-microscale, respectively; Expt means experiment; Sim means simulation; DVM means discrete vortex method; LES means large-eddy simulation; RANS means Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes).

Figure 1

Figure 1.(a) Three-dimensional computational domain (not to scale). Here, $x$ is the global streamwise coordinate, while $x'$ denotes the local streamwise coordinate with its origin at the plate location. (b) Side view depicting the perforated plate details.

Figure 2

Table 2.Numerical mesh and domain details in various DNS studies of flow over normal flat plates. Here, $L_{x_u}$ and $L_{x_d}$ refer to the upstream and downstream extents of the domain from the plate location, respectively, while $L_y$ and $L_z$ correspond to the spanwise and cross-stream lengths, respectively.

Figure 3

Figure 2.Mean pressure coefficient over a non-perforated plate at $Re_d = 250$. Experimental data of Fage & Johansen (1927) are at $Re_d = 1.5 \times 10^5$. The top and bottom halves of the curve signify the data from the front and back of the plate, respectively.

Figure 4

Table 3.Results from non-perforated plate simulations.

Figure 5

Figure 3.Comparison of the mean quantities obtained in the current DNS with the experiments of Castro (1971). (a) Drag coefficient $\overline {C_d}$: open triangle denotes current DNS at $Re_d = 250$ ($\overline {C_d}=2.223$ at $\beta =0\,\%$); grey triangle denotes blockage corrected DNS at $Re_d = 250$ ($\overline {C_{d_c}}=1.961$ at $\beta =0\,\%$); grey square denotes wake traverse method at $Re_d = 9 \times 10^4$ ($\overline {C_d}=1.85$ at $\beta =0\,\%$); open square denotes drag balance method at $Re_d = 9 \times 10^4$ ($\overline {C_d}=1.89$ at $\beta =0\,\%$) (Castro 1971). (b) Strouhal number $St_d$: open triangle denotes current DNS at $Re_d = 250$ at $15d$ downstream of the plate ($St_d=0.164$ at $\beta =0\,\%$); open diamond denotes $Re_d = 2.5 \times 10^4$; open square denotes $Re_d = 9 \times 10^4$ ($St_d=0.14$ at $\beta =0\,\%$) (Castro 1971). Note that the lines are used to represent the trend.

Figure 6

Table 4.Mean quantities. The peak spectral energy of the $w'$ velocity ($E_{peak}$), $v_{rms}$ and $w_{rms}$ are all calculated in the ‘far’ wake at $15d$ downstream along the top edge of the plate ($y/d=0$, $z/d=8.5$). All spectral data are taken for 60 shedding cycles. Since the wake characteristics are believed to be following the general trend at intermediate porosities, only $\beta =0\,\%$, 9 %, 16 % and $25\,\%$ have been analysed in detail.

Figure 7

Figure 4.Instantaneous spanwise vorticity $\omega _y=\pm (0.004\unicode{x2013}0.005)$: (a,c,e,g) side view depicting wake width; (b,d, f,h) bottom views, at (a,b) $\beta = 0\,\%$, (c,d) $\beta = 9\,\%$, (e, f) $\beta = 16\,\%$, and (g,h) $\beta = 25\,\%$.

Figure 8

Figure 5.Instantaneous $\lambda _2$ from $-3\times 10^{-6}$ to $-4\times 10^{-6}$: (a) $\beta = 0\,\%$, (b) $\beta = 9\,\%$, (c) $\beta = 16\,\%$, (d) $\beta = 25\,\%$.

Figure 9

Figure 6.Instantaneous fluctuation kinetic energy at mid $z/d$ plane: (a,c,e,g) whole domain; (b,d, f,h) the ‘bleed’ jet region (‘near’ wake). Note that $x/d=5$ indicates the plate location. Observe that the colour bar ranges differ between panels.

Figure 10

Table 5.Various Reynolds numbers shown here are defined as $Re_h=U_o h/\nu$, $Re_{m}=U_o m/\nu$ and $Re_{jet}=\bar {u}_{jet,max} h/\nu$. Here, $m$ is also equal to $2s$ (cf. figure 1b).

Figure 11

Figure 7.The $w$ velocity time trace sampled in (a,c,e,g) the ‘near’ wake ($1d$ downstream along the top edge of the plate, $z/d=8.5$), and (b,d, f,h) the ‘far’ wake ($15d$ downstream along the top edge of the plate, $z/d=8.5$).

Figure 12

Figure 8.Velocity time trace sampled in the ‘near’ wake ($1d$ downstream of the plate along the top edge of the plate, $y/d=0$, $z/d=8.5$): (a,c,e,g) $v/U_o$, (b,d, f,h) $w/U_o$.

Figure 13

Figure 9.Velocity time trace sampled in the ‘far’ wake ($15d$ downstream of the plate along the top edge of the plate, $y/d=0$, $z/d=8.5$): (a,c,e,g) $v/U_o$, (b,d, f,h) $w/U_o$.

Figure 14

Figure 10.Fast Fourier transforms of the $\hat {w}$ velocity sampled at (a,c,e) the ‘near’ wake ($1d$ downstream along the top edge of the plate, $y/d=0$, $z/d=8.5$), and (b,d, f) the ‘far’ wake ($15d$ downstream along the top edge of the plate, $y/d=0$, $z/d=8.5$), for (a,b) $\beta = 9\,\%$, (c,d) $\beta = 16\,\%$, (e, f) $\beta = 25\,\%$. Here, $f_s$ denotes the dominant $St_d$.

Figure 15

Figure 11.Two-point correlation $\rho$ at (a,c,e) the ‘near’ wake ($1d$ downstream along the top edge of the plate, $z/d=8.5$), and (b,d, f) the ‘far’ wake ($15d$ downstream along the top edge of the plate, $z/d=8.5$), for (a,b) $\widehat {uu}$, (c,d) $\widehat {vv}$, (e, f) $\widehat {ww}$.

Figure 16

Figure 12.Three-dimensional iso-contours of streamwise vorticity $\omega _x =\pm (0.002\unicode{x2013}0.003)$, for (a) $\beta = 0\,\%$, (b) $\beta = 9\,\%$, (c) $\beta = 16\,\%$, (d) $\beta = 25\,\%$. Yellow and black colours indicate positive and negative values of $\omega _x$, respectively.

Figure 17

Figure 13.Instantaneous rotation rate at the wake centreline ($z/d=8$) showing the flapping mechanism of the ‘bleed’ flow through the holes (jet).

Figure 18

Figure 14.Velocity time trace sampled at $y/d=2.5$, $z/d=8$ (i.e. along the centreline of the third hole), for (a,c,e) $v/U_o$, (b,d, f) $w/U_o$. Sampling across the streamwise direction is done at $1d$ downstream of the plate for $\beta = 9\,\%$ or $2d$ downstream of the plate for $\beta \geqslant 16\,\%$ due to differential jet length.

Figure 19

Figure 15.(a,c,e) Fast Fourier transforms of the $\hat {v}$ velocity sampled at $y/d=2.5$, $z/d=8$ (i.e. along the centreline of the third hole), and (b,d, f) spectra along the span, at (a,b) $\beta =9\,\%$, (c,d) $\beta =16\,\%$, (e, f) $\beta =25\,\%$. Sampling along the streamwise direction is done at $1d$ downstream of the plate for $\beta = 9\,\%$ or $2d$ downstream of the plate for $\beta \geqslant 16\,\%$ due to differential jet length.

Figure 20

Figure 16.Mean primary flow along (a) the plate centreline, and (b) the hole centreline (averaged in time and along the pitch).

Figure 21

Figure 17.Secondary flow (averaged in time and along the pitch) at $z/d=8$ (i.e. mid $z$ plane) for $\beta =9\,\%$: (a) $\bar {v}/U_o$ upstream of the plate; (b) $\bar {p}/(\rho U_o^2)$ upstream of the plate; (c) $\bar {v}/U_o$ downstream of the plate; (d) $\bar {p}/(\rho U_o^2)$ downstream of the plate.

Figure 22

Figure 18.Secondary flow averaged in time and along the pitch, $\bar {v}/U_o$, at $z/d=8$ (i.e. mid $z$ plane): (a) upstream of the plate; and (b) downstream of the plate.

Figure 23

Figure 19.Mesh topology in an $x\unicode{x2013}z$ plane.

Figure 24

Table 6.Mesh convergence test. The Strouhal number $St_d$ is recorded at $15d$ downstream of the plate. Here, $h$ refers to the hole or gap size between the plates. See Singh & Narasimhamurthy (2021) for more details.

Figure 25

Table 7.The Strouhal number $St_d$ and mean drag coefficient $\overline {C_d}$ for various aspect ratios $AR$ of a perforated plate at $\beta =25\,\%$. Here, $St_d$ is recorded in the far wake at $15d$ downstream along the top edge of the plate, $z/d=8.5$.

Figure 26

Figure 20.Instantaneous $\lambda _2$ contours depicting vortex topology for various $AR$ of perforated plate at $\beta =25\,\%$.

Figure 27

Figure 21.Instantaneous $\lambda _2$ from $-3\times 10^{-6}$ to $-4\times 10^{-6}$ depicting the vortex topology of a perforated plate at $\beta =25\,\%$: (a) domain $L_x \times L_y \times L_z = 25 \times 6 \times 16$; (b) domain $L_x \times L_y \times L_z = 31 \times 6 \times 32$.

Figure 28

Figure 22.Instantaneous 3-D iso-contours of streamwise vorticity $\omega _x=\pm (0.002\unicode{x2013}0.003)$ of a perforated plate at $\beta =25\,\%$. Yellow and black colours indicate positive and negative values of $\omega _x$, respectively: (a) domain $L_x \times L_y \times L_z = 25 \times 6 \times 16$; (b) domain $L_x \times L_y \times L_z = 31 \times 6 \times 32$.

Figure 29

Table 8.Influence of domain blockage on $\overline {C_d}$ and $St_d$ for a perforated plate at $\beta =25\,\%$. Here, the domain length is varied in the streamwise (upstream of the plate) and cross-stream directions. The blockage ratio is defined as $(d/L_z)\times 100$.