Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:44:07.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compact multi frequency strip loaded microstrip patch antenna with spur-lines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2016

Avisankar Roy*
Affiliation:
Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia, Purba Medinipur, West Bengal, India. Phone: 9831024749
Sunandan Bhunia
Affiliation:
Central Institute of Technology, Kokrajhar, Assam, India
Debasree Chanda Sarkar
Affiliation:
DETS, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India
Partha Pratim Sarkar
Affiliation:
DETS, University of Kalyani, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal, India
Santosh Kumar Chowdhury
Affiliation:
Jadavpur University, West Bengal, India
*
Corresponding author: A. Roy Email: avisankar.roy@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper a new design of compact single layered triangular slotted microstrip patch antenna with spur lines and strip loading is proposed. It has been experimentally investigated that strip loading causes more size reduction where spur lines and triangular slot introduces multi frequency operation of microstrip patch antenna. The size reduction has been found to be 87% for the proposed antenna. In this article the effect of strip loading and spur lines over compactness are individually analyzed.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2016 
Figure 0

Table 1. Performance comparison of proposed antenna with other antenna with respect to compactness, dimension, and multi frequency.

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Antenna 1 configuration.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Antenna 2a configuration.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Antenna 2b configuration.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Antenna 2c configuration.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Antenna 2d configuration.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Antenna 3 configuration.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Fabricated Antenna 3 structure.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Equivalent circuit of (a) Antenna 1, (b) Antenna 2a, (c) Antenna 2b, (d) Antenna 2c, (e) Antenna 2d, and (f) Antenna 3.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Antenna with spur line, strips, and triangular slot.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. (a) Frequency and return loss with variation of LS1. (b) Frequency and return loss with variation of LS2. (c) Frequency and return loss with variation of LS3. (d) Frequency and return loss with variation of LS4.

Figure 11

Table 2. Effect of resonant frequency and return loss with the variation of LS1 where Ls2 = 14 mm,  Ls3 = 12 mm, and Ls4 = 4 mm (Fig. 9).

Figure 12

Table 3. Effect of resonant frequency and return loss with the variation of LS2 where Ls1 = 10 mm, Ls3 = 12 mm, and Ls4 = 4 mm (Fig. 9).

Figure 13

Table 4. Effect of resonant frequency and return loss with the variation of LS3 where Ls1 = 10 mm, Ls2 = 14 mm, and Ls4 = 4 mm (Fig. 9).

Figure 14

Table 5. Effect of resonant frequency and return loss with the variation of LS4 where Ls1 = 10 mm, Ls2 = 14 mm, and Ls3 = 12 mm (Fig. 9).

Figure 15

Fig. 11. (a) Variation of gain with LS1. (b) Variation of gain with LS2. (c) Variation of gain with LS3.

Figure 16

Table 6. Simulated results.

Figure 17

Table 7. Measured results of Antenna 1 and Antenna 3.

Figure 18

Fig. 12. Frequency versus return loss graph for Antenna 1.

Figure 19

Fig. 13. Simulated frequency versus return loss graph for Antenna 2a, Antenna 2b, Antenna 2c, and Antenna 2d.

Figure 20

Fig. 14. Frequency versus return loss graph for proposed Antenna 3.

Figure 21

Fig. 15. Simulated and measured radiation pattern for (a) Antenna 1 at 5.6 GHz, (b) Antenna 3 at 1.8 GHz, (c) 4.7 GHz, and (d) 5.4 GHz.

Figure 22

Fig. 16. Gain of Antenna 3.

Figure 23

Fig. 17. Radiation efficiency of Antenna 3.

Figure 24

Fig. 18. Directivity of Antenna 3.