Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T21:56:03.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compact transition from CBCPW to substrate integrated suspended line (SISL) for operation up to 46 GHz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2019

F. Parment
Affiliation:
University Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, CNRS, IMS Research Center, 33405 Talence, France French Space Agency, CNES, Toulouse, France
A. Ghiotto*
Affiliation:
University Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, CNRS, IMS Research Center, 33405 Talence, France
T.-P. Vuong
Affiliation:
IMEP-LAHC Laboratory, University of Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
L. Carpentier
Affiliation:
French Space Agency, CNES, Toulouse, France
K. Wu
Affiliation:
Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Poly-Grames Research Center, Montreal, QC, H3 T 1J4, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: A. Ghiotto, E-mail: anthony.ghiotto@ims-bordeaux.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A compact transition between conductor-backed coplanar waveguide (CBCPW) and substrate integrated suspended line (SISL) is presented. Compared to the reported transitions from CBCPW to SISL, performance and compactness are improved. For demonstration purpose, a multilayer transition is designed and fabricated for operation up to 46 GHz. Experimental results, based on an electronic calibration and thru–reflect–line calibration allowing measurement in the 0.01–50 GHz frequency range, demonstrate an insertion loss of 0.59 ± 0.51 dB with a return loss of better than 10 dB in the 10 MHz to 46 GHz frequency range.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geometry of the back-to-back CBCPW to SISL transition: (a) top view of substrate 1, (b) top view of substrate 2, (c) top view of substrate 3, (d) top view of substrate 4, (e) top view of substrate 5, (f) cross-section view along the AA’ cutting line.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Pictures of the fabricated prototype substrates before assembling: (a) substrate 1: top substrate enclosing the SISL structure, (b) substrate 2: SISL upper air cavity, (c) substrate 3: SISL and CBCPW conductor strip, (d) substrate 4: SISL lower air cavity, (e) substrate 5: bottom substrate enclosing the SISL structure.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Pictures of the fabricated TRL calibration kit : (a) thru, (b) reflect, and (c) line with a delay of 6.25 ps.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Back-to-back transition S-parameters obtained in simulation and measurement.

Figure 4

Table 1. Performance comparison of the reported CBCPW to SISL transition