Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:07:06.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Production and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii ROP18 with strain-specific reactivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2020

Famin Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Rui Su
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Chengjian Han
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Yang Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Jingyang Li
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China The Clinical Laboratory of the Third People's Hospital of Heifei, Hefei, China
Jinjin Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Qingli Luo
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Lingzhi Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Junling Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Xiaojuan Ding
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Jian Du
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Deyong Chu
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Yihong Cai
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China Department of Health Inspection and Quarantine, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Jilong Shen
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Li Yu*
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Microbiology and Parasitology, Anhui Provincial Laboratory of Zoonoses of High Institutions, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
*
Author for correspondence: Li Yu, E-mail: lilyyu33@126.com

Abstract

The rhoptry kinase 18 of Toxoplasma gondii (TgROP18) has been identified as a key virulence factor that allows the parasite to escape from host immune defences and promotes its proliferation in host cells. Although much research is focused on the interaction between host cells and TgROP18, the development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against TgROP18 has not been reported till date. To produce mAbs targeting TgROP18, two hybridomas secreting mAbs against TgROP18, designated as A1 and T2, were generated using cell fusion technology. The subtypes of the A1 and T2 mAbs were identified as IgG3 λ and IgM κ, and peptide scanning revealed that the core sequences of the antigenic epitopes were 180LRAQRRRSELVFE192 and 351NYFLLMMRAEADM363, respectively. The T2 mAb specifically reacted with both T. gondii type I and Chinese I, but not with T. gondii type II, Plasmodium falciparum or Schistosoma japonicum. Finally, the sequences of heavy chain and light chain complementarity-determining regions of T2 were amplified, cloned and characterized, making the modification of the mAb feasible in the future. The development of mAbs against TgROP18 would aid the investigation of the molecular mechanisms underlying the modulation of host cellular functions by TgROP18, and in the development of strategies to diagnose and treat Toxoplasmosis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Design of the synthesized peptide sequence

Figure 1

Fig. 1. SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis of the recombinant ROP18 protein (rROP18) expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21. (A) Expression of pET28a-ROP18/BL21(DE3). Lane M: protein marker; Lane 1: proteins in pET28a-ROP18/BL21 before induction; Lane 2: proteins in pET28a-ROP18/BL21 after induction with isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG); Lane 3: supernatant of pET28a-ROP18/BL21 bacteria after ultrasonication; Lane 4: precipitation of pET28a-ROP18/BL21 bacteria after ultrasonication; Lane 5: proteins in pET28a/BL21. (B) rROP18 purified by Ni2+-affinity chromatography. Lane M: protein marker; Lane 1–2: purified proteins. (C) Western blot analysis of the purified rROP18. Lane M: protein marker; Lane 1–3: rROP18 recognized by His monoclonal antibody.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Generation of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against ROP18. (A) The presence of antibodies in the serum of immunized mice was detected up to the 1: 204 800 dilution by indirect ELISA. The serum of normal mice acted as negative control. The ratio of the positive group (P) to the negative group (N) was calculated, when P/N ⩾ 2.1 the result is positive, P/N < 2.1 and ⩾1.5 the result is uncertain, and P/N < 1.5 the result is negative. (B) Growth of subclones at different days: (a) 10 days; (b) 13 days; (c) 16 days; and (d) 20 days. (C) Levels of mice ascites produced by A1 and T2 hybridomas. (D) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified mice ascites. Lane M: protein marker; Lane purified: heavy and light chains of the purified mice ascites. Data represent three independent experiments, each with an intra-experiment duplicate.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Subtype and epitope identification of the anti-ROP18 mAbs. (A) Subtype identification of A1 and T2 mAbs. Mouse monoclonal antibody isotyping kit indicated that the subtype of the A1 and T2 strains were IgG3 λ type and IgM κ type, respectively. ***P < 0.001. (B) Epitope identification of A1 and T2 mAbs by peptide scanning. The A1 and T2 mAbs recognized P5 and P14 peptides, respectively, which represented the core sequence of 180LRAQRRRSELVFE192 and 351NYFLLMMRAEADM363. **P < 0.01. Data represent three independent experiments, each with an intra-experiment duplicate.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Specificity of the T2 mAbs evaluated by Western blot. (A) T2 mAbs reactivity against different recombinant proteins in ROP2 family. Lane M: protein marker; Lane 1: ROP5 recombinant protein; Lane 2: ROP18 recombinant protein. (B) Polyclonal antibody against ROP18 reactivity against Toxoplasma gondii strains. Lane M: protein marker; Lane wh3: whole protein extract from TgCtwh6; Lane wh6: whole protein extract from TgCtwh3. (C) T2 mAbs reacted with proteins from T. gondii strains, P. falciparum and S. japonicum. Lane M: protein marker, Lane RH: RH strain; Lane wh3: TgCtwh3 strain; Lane wh6: TgCtwh6 strain; Lane ME49: ME49 strain; Lane fal: P. falciparum; Lane jap: S. japonicum.

Figure 5

Table 2. Nucleotide and amino acid sequences of complementary determining regions (CDRs) of T2 monoclonal antibodies

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Confocal laser scanning microscopy of the Toxoplasma gondii antigen recognized by T2 mAbs. Human foreskin fibroblast cells were infected with T. gondii GFP-RH strain tachyzoite for 12, 24 and 36 h, and T2 mAbs were used to detect the parasites. Toxoplasma gondii was double-stained with the T2 mAbs (red), GFP (green). Scale bar = 10 μm.

Supplementary material: File

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Zhang et al. supplementary material 1

Download Zhang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Zhang et al. supplementary material

Zhang et al. supplementary material 2

Download Zhang et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.5 KB