II. RF TRANSCEIVER SYSTEM DESIGN WITH WIDEBAND RF CARRIER

In this section, the proposed connectivity system architecture with the WRC is described. Whereas a conventional system with the CWC has a narrow band spectrum determined by the data-rate, the proposed one with the WRC generates an RF signal BW by the carrier signal BW. Figure 1 presents a comparison of the transmitting power control methods between the CWC and WRC. For the conventional CWC, as the peak power needs to be amplified within the specified spectrum, a power amplifier should be designed with higher linearity. The WRC can control the channel power by adjusting the channel BW with a constant maximum emission power. In the case of the multi-band OFDM UWB, in spite of the various merits, the PHY suffered from the spectral mask violation of OFDM signals as well as high-power consumption. Therefore, because the transmitter can keep the variation of the signal envelope constant and the maximum radiation spectral density fixed, the transmitting amplifiers do not require high linearity or a back-off margin, which makes it possible for the proposed system to be designed with a low-power architecture. In addition, the power control is not performed in the microwave power amplifier, but rather in the local oscillation sub-system. This also allows a low-power consumption system architecture to be achieved, because the BW control is done in low-frequency (LF) devices with efficient DC power consumption. Table 1 summarizes the system characteristics with both types of carriers.

Fig. 1.

Power control methods of the (a) CWC and (b) WRC.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the CWC and WRC.

The RF transceiver system is designed with a WRC as shown in Figure 2. The transmitter consists of a WRC signal generator, a switching ASK modulator, an LPF, and an amplifier. The WRC signal generator is implemented by an LF noisy signal generator, a variable attenuator, a bias-tee, and a VCO. The pseudorandom LF noisy signal is constructed by combining sinusoidal-, triangular-, and sawtooth-waves with different periods. The WRC is generated by VCO output, which can control the center frequency by the offset DC provided through a bias-tee and the BW by adjusting the amplitude of the LF noisy signal through a variable attenuator. The WRC signal generator can control the carrier spectrum of the BW from 20 to 100 MHz and the center frequency from 2 to 3 GHz. The ASK modulation scheme is adopted with a switch modulator. The receiver is designed using LNAs, an envelope detector, and a comparator (1-bit ADC), and connected to a digital FPGA board for signal processing.

Fig. 2.

System architecture with the WRC generation.

III. SYSTEM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

The performance of the WRC system was evaluated. Two test schemes were employed to evaluate the system operating performance and to provide a comparison of the data transmitting abilities for different power control schemes of the proposed WRC and conventional CWC by BER tests.

In order to evaluate the system performance of the WRC RF transceiver, the controllable WRC signal generation and digital data transmission were tested. Figure 3 presents the WRC spectra for the BW adjustability for 50, 100, and 200 MHz, and the center frequency tunability of the WRC with the 100 MHz-BW for 2.2, 2.4, 2.6, and 2.8 GHz, respectively. From the flexible spectra, both RF power control and channel selection can be achieved for the RF system applications. For the digital data transmission tests, the WRC signal with a 100 MHz-BW modulated a pseudorandom bit stream (PRBS) with a data-rate of 64 kbps, a 2⁹−1 random pattern, and a 50% duty-cycle. The envelope waveform of the received signal was demodulated by an envelope detector and a comparator. Figure 4 presents the measured results of pulse recovery tests in the same pulse repetition period. Figure 4(a) shows modulated pulses at a transmitter, whereas Figure 4(b) presents recovered output pulses at a receiver. From the experimental measurements, the transmitted digital data were well recovered with excellent agreements.

Fig. 3.

System signal adjustability of the WRC spectra.

Fig. 4.

Pulse recovery test results for a 2⁹−1 PRBS pulse data. (a) Transmitted pulses. (b) Recovered pulses.

In order to verify the power control abilities, at first, the sensitivity levels were measured for the proposed WRC and conventional CWC. Because the WRC system emits a relatively low maximum spectral power, its transmission performance can be degraded for various channel BWs. Customized FPGA digital boards were fabricated for the BER tests. The board is organized with power supplies for the RF boards, a variable random-digital-data-generator, and a received-bits-comparison-and-count. In order to obtain impartial measurements, the same experimental environments were established such as the same receiver system and communication link. Figure 5 presents the BER test measurement set-up that consists of a transmitter, a variable attenuator, and a receiver that was connected by coaxial cables to eliminate the effect of other interferers. The received power is monitored by a 10 dB directional coupler and a microwave power meter. During the transmitted RF power is adjusted, the bit errors were measured for each received power. The received RF channel power can be expressed in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), because the receiver has the same noise BW of the envelope detector. In order to avoid numerically uncontrollable noise and interference, the ideal measurements were performed. The digital PRBS information data have a data-rate of 64 kbps and random pattern of 2⁹−1. In BER measurements, a total of 38 400 000 bits (38.4 Mbits) were tried for each received RF power level from −90 to −50 dBm.

Fig. 5.

Experimental setup for BER tests.

Figure 6 presents the measured BERs for the CWC and WRC systems. A BER of 10⁻³ is considered to be a reliable detection threshold based on the IEEE recommendation [23]. The experimental results present sensitivity levels of −67 dBm for the WRC system and −68 dBm for the conventional CWC one, which show that they have the same data transmitting performance. From the measured sensitivity levels, the communication distances, d were computed for line-of-sight (LOS) environments by the Friis transmission formula in (1).

(1)$$20 \hbox{log}d = P_T \lpar \hbox{dBm}\rpar - P_R \lpar \hbox{dBm}\rpar + 20 \hbox{log}\lpar \lambda /4\pi \rpar.$$

Fig. 6.

Measured BERs for received powers.

The communication distance is experimented for the peak emission power of the CWC and the channel power of the WRC. As the peak power and WRC BW are increased, the maximum communication distances are evaluated from BER measurements. In Figure 7, while the communication distance is increased from 40 to 126 m as the CWC peak power varies from 2 to 12 dBm, it is changed from 54 to 140 m as the WRC BW increases from 30 to 200 MHz. For the WRC signal, total transmitted power, P _T is adjusted by a product of a power spectral density (dBm/Hz) and a BW (Hz). In order to estimate exact channel power, non-rectangular signal shape and a duty-cycle of on-off keying (OOK)-modulated pulses should be considered. From the experimental results, it is estimated that the adjustment of BW makes the increment of transmitted power from 7.6 to 15.9 dBm. Therefore, the WRC system can achieve the linear power control from BW variations. According to the experimental measurements, the proposed WRC was verified to have almost the same data transmission performance as the conventional CWC, in spite of its adjusted channel BWs. Figure 8 shows the photographs of the implemented WRC system and BER measurement setup.

Fig. 7.

Communication distances for power control schemes by (a) peak power and (b) channel BW.

Fig. 8.

Photograph of the implemented WRC system and BER test configuration.