Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T22:03:39.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vortex dynamics of a boundary layer disturbed by cylinder wakes: effects of the gap ratio and the relative boundary layer thickness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2026

Jiangsheng Wang
Affiliation:
Fluid Mechanics Key Laboratory of Education Ministry, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, PR China
Guosheng He*
Affiliation:
Fluid Mechanics Key Laboratory of Education Ministry, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, PR China School of Aerospace Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, PR China State Key Laboratory of Environment Characteristics and Effects for Near-Space, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, PR China
Jinjun Wang
Affiliation:
Fluid Mechanics Key Laboratory of Education Ministry, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing 100191, PR China
*
Corresponding author: Guosheng He, heguosheng@bit.edu.cn

Abstract

Content of image described in text.

The vortical structures in a flat-plate boundary layer disturbed by circular cylinder wakes are investigated using particle image velocimetry and hydrogen bubble visualization techniques. The cylinder diameter (D) and the gap between the cylinder and flat plate (G) are systematically varied to establish an investigated matrix of Reynolds number ReD = 530–1600, gap ratio $G/D$ = 0.33–6 and relative boundary layer thickness $\delta_0/D$ = 0.35–1.06 (δ0 is boundary layer thickness at the installation position of cylinder). An unexpected large critical value of $G/D$ = 4 is captured to divide the wake-vortices–boundary-layer interaction into two modes for $\delta_0/D$ = 1.06: the wake vortices trigger secondary vortices (SV) for $G/D$ ≤ 4; no secondary vortex is observed inside the boundary layer for $G/D$ > 4. The flow physics behind this mode switching is elaborated. An increase in $\delta_0/D$ is found to cause an earlier and stronger interaction for a fixed $G/D$. It is generally characterized by an earlier and faster growth of turbulent kinetic energy inside the boundary layer, stronger SV and a more pronounced deflection of wake vortex trajectories. The intensified interaction strengthens the mixing between the wake and boundary layer and accelerates the boundary layer transition, causing an earlier prevalence of hairpin vortex packets and a faster establishment of turbulent boundary layer. Although the interaction is simultaneously influenced by $G/D$ and $\delta_0/D$, the normalized growth rate of turbulent kinetic energy inside the boundary layer exhibits a remarkably exponential scaling with respect to $G/D$ during the initial stage of interaction.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Figure 1 long description.Sketch of the currently investigated circular-cylinder–flat-plate configuration and the experimental set-up: (a) side view and (b) plan view. Here PIV1, PIV2, PIV3 and PIV4 denote the different set-ups for the PIV, respectively.

Figure 1

Table 1. Investigated cases of PIV measurement. The databases denoted by the superscripts of †, * and ‡ originate from He et al. (2016), He et al. (2017) and Wang et al. (2024), respectively.Table 1 long description.

Figure 2

Table 2. The dimensionless parameters of investigated cases.Table 2 long description.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Two-dimensional turbulent kinetic energy (k) above the flat plate at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06: (a) no cylinder; (b) G/D$G/D$ = 1; (c) G/D$G/D$ = 2; (d) G/D$G/D$ = 3; (e) G/D$G/D$ = 4; (f) G/D$G/D$ = 5; (g) G/D$G/D$ = 6. The black dashed line shows the boundary layer edge. The crosses denote the virtual probes where streamwise velocity fluctuations are extracted. The blue crosses in (b–e) and black crosses in (b–g) are located at the local maxima of urms in the lower shear layer of cylinder and in the boundary layer, respectively. The positions of blue crosses in (f) and (g) are set as suggested by He et al. (2017), because a local maximum of urms is absent for these two cases. The black cross in (a) is located at the same position of that in (g). The magenta crosses in (d–g) are located at the same position of the black cross in (c). The coordinates of these probes are also presented. The scales of x and y axes are consistent.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Figure 3 long description.The streamwise tracking of E(x) at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06. The black dashed line shows the exponential function describing the initial growth of E(x) = ae(αx), where α denotes the growth rate of exponential function. The insert shows the fit error (details in Appendix A).

Figure 5

Figure 4. The PSD for the cases at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06: (a) PSD related to the cylinder wake; (b) PSD related to the boundary layer above the flat plate. The results in (a) are calculated by the signals extracted from the blue crosses in figure 2. The results shown as black and grey lines in (b) are calculated by the signals extracted from the black and magenta crosses in figure 2(b–g), respectively. The PSD related to the black cross in figure 2(a) is shown as a blue line in (b) for comparison. The red and magenta dots denote the shedding frequency of wake vortices (fundamental frequency) and its second harmonic, respectively. The PSD magnitude in each subfigure stepwise increases by 40 dB Hz−1 as the value of G/D$G/D$ increases.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Figure 5 long description.Typical instants of phase-averaged vorticity contours at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06: (a) G/D$G/D$ = 1; (b) G/D$G/D$ = 2; (c) G/D$G/D$ = 3; (d) G/D$G/D$ = 4; (e) G/D$G/D$ = 5; (f) G/D$G/D$ = 6. The magenta arrows in (c) and (d) mark the wavy pattern of boundary layer. The vortical structures with positive and negative vorticity are visualized by the λci isolines coloured black and red, respectively. The absolute values of these λci isolines are plotted from 1 with a uniform increment of 1. The scales of x and y axes are consistent.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Trajectories (a) and circulation (b) of LWV and UWV at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06. The trajectories in the vertical direction are subtracted by the vertical distance between the cylinder centre and flat plate (yc in figure 1). The absolute value of circulation is normalized by πDU∞.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Trajectories (a) and circulation (b) of SV at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06. The absolute value of circulation is normalized by πDU∞.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Typical instants of virtual dye visualization at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06: (a) G/D$G/D$ = 1; (b) G/D$G/D$ = 2; (c) G/D$G/D$ = 3; (d) G/D$G/D$ = 4; (e) G/D$G/D$ = 5; (f) G/D$G/D$ = 6. The scales of x and y axes are consistent.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Typical instants of plan-view hydrogen bubble visualization at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06: (a) G/D$G/D$ = 1; (b) G/D$G/D$ = 2; (c) G/D$G/D$ = 3; (d) G/D$G/D$ = 4. The platinum wire is set parallel to the wall at y/δ0 = 0.28. Arrow A marks the newly generated secondary vortex in the current cycle. Arrows B and C mark the flow structures originating from the SV of the former one and two cycles, respectively.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Spatial modes (Φv) of Fourier mode decomposition at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06: (a,b) G/D$G/D$ = 2; (c,d) G/D$G/D$ = 3; (e, f) G/D$G/D$ = 4; (g,h) G/D$G/D$ = 5; (i,j) G/D$G/D$ = 6. Panels (a), (c), (e), (g), (i) and (b), (d), (f), (h), (j) show the modes related to the fundamental frequency and its second harmonic, respectively. Only the modes of vertical velocity fluctuations are provided here. The magenta crosses approximately mark the formation position of SV. The scales of x and y axes are consistent.

Figure 12

Figure 11. Figure 11 long description.The streamwise tracking of E(x) at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 0.53. The black dashed line shows the exponential function describing the initial growth of E(x) = ae(αx), where α denotes the growth rate of exponential function. The insert shows the fit error (details in Appendix A).

Figure 13

Figure 12. Figure 12 long description.The streamwise tracking of E(x) at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 0.35. The black dashed line shows the exponential function describing the initial growth of E(x) = ae(αx), where α denotes the growth rate of exponential function. The insert shows the fit error (details in Appendix A).

Figure 14

Figure 13. The streamwise tracking of E(x) at typical G/D$G/D$: (a) G/D$G/D$ = 1; (b) G/D$G/D$ = 2.

Figure 15

Figure 14. The exponential fitting of non-dimensional growth rates (αD) for the initial growth of E(x) affected by different values of G/D$G/D$ and δ0/D$\delta_0/D$. The black fitted line is expressed as αD = 5.3820e(−1.3538G/D$G/D$) + 0.1021. The insert shows the fit error (details in Appendix A).

Figure 16

Figure 15. Trajectories and circulation of wake vortices and SV at G/D$G/D$ = 1: (a) trajectories of wake vortices and SV; (b) circulation of wake vortices; (c) circulation of SV. The absolute value of circulation is normalized by πDU∞.

Figure 17

Figure 16. Figure 16 long description.Trajectories and circulation of wake vortices and SV at G/D$G/D$ = 2: (a) trajectories of wake vortices and SV; (b) circulation of wake vortices; (c) circulation of SV. The absolute value of circulation is normalized by πDU∞.

Figure 18

Figure 17. Strouhal number (St = fD/U∞) of the fundamental frequency for different values of G/D$G/D$ and δ0/D$\delta_0/D$. The results of literature are also provided here for comparison (Price et al.2002; Lin et al.2009; He et al.2017; Li et al.2022; Wang et al.2024). The upper and lower dashed lines are expressed as St = 0.18e(−1.34G/D$G/D$) + 0.215 and St = 0.05e(−1.34G/D$G/D$) + 0.215, respectively.

Figure 19

Figure 18. Figure 18 long description.Profiles of time-averaged streamwise velocity (U) (a–f) and r.m.s. of the streamwise fluctuating velocity (urms) (g–l) at G/D$G/D$ = 2: (a,g) x = 50 mm; (b,h) x = 100 mm; (c,i) x = 200 mm; (d,j) x = 300 mm; (e,k) x = 500 mm; (f,l) x = 1000 mm. The black and grey dashed lines denote the local Blasius profiles and the urms profiles without the presence of cylinder, respectively.

Figure 20

Figure 19. Typical hairpin vortex packets in the boundary layer at different streamwise locations for the case of G/D$G/D$ = 2 at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06: (a) x/D = 27–50; (b) x/D = 50–73; (c) x/D = 96–119. The black arrows mark the hairpin vortices in one hairpin vortex packet. The blue arrows in (c) show the hairpin vortices in another hairpin vortex packet.

Figure 21

Figure 20. Figure 20 long description.Typical hairpin vortex packets in the boundary layer at different streamwise locations for the case of G/D$G/D$ = 2 at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 0.35: (a) x/D = 9–16.6; (b) x/D = 16.6–24.3; (c) x/D = 32–39.6. The grey arrows in (a) and (b) mark the destabilized SV. The black arrow in (b) marks a typical hairpin vortex. The black and blue arrows in (c) mark two hairpin vortex packets, respectively.

Figure 22

Figure 21. Time-averaged streamwise velocity profiles at x = 500 mm and 1000 mm for G/D$G/D$ = 2. The black dashed lines show the expressions of linear sublayer and log-law (U+ = 2.439ln(y+) + 5.5). The blue line shows the Spalding fit of turbulent boundary layer.

Figure 23

Figure 22. Figure 22 long description.Typical instants of instantaneous streamwise velocity contours for the plan-view measurement at G/D$G/D$ = 2: (a–c) δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06; (d–f) δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 0.35. The measurement plane is located at y/δ0 = 0.28, which is approximately equal to y+ = 9 in (c) and (f). The black lines mark the reference positions (x = 50 mm in (a), x = 195 mm in (d), x = 500 mm in (b) and (e), x = 1000 mm in (c) and (f)) for the calculation of two-point correlation coefficients in figures 24 and 25. The different values of x between (a) and (d) originate from the different formation positions of SV.

Figure 24

Figure 23. Typical instants of plan-view hydrogen bubble visualization for the typical case of G/D$G/D$ = 2 around x = 1000 mm: (a) no cylinder case; (b) δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06; (c) δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 0.53; (d) δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 0.35. The platinum wire is set parallel to the wall with a vertical interval of y/δ0 = 0.28. The coordinate of (a) is normalized by D = 10 mm.

Figure 25

Figure 24. The two-point correlation coefficient (R) contours for the plan-view measurement at G/D$G/D$ = 2. (a–f) present the results related to the reference positions depicted in figure 22(a–f), respectively. The reference positions marked by black lines are the same as those in figure 22. The black dashed line marks the most upstream or downstream location where R is equal to 0.3.

Figure 26

Figure 25. Figure 25 long description.The two-point correlation coefficient profiles extracted from the reference positions of figure 24: (a) x = 50 mm; (b) x = 500 mm; (c) x = 1000 mm; (d) x = 195 mm; (e) x = 500 mm; (f) x = 1000 mm. The minima of correlation coefficients are marked by blue crosses. The inner-scaled spanwise coordinates (z+) are provided in (b), (c), (e) and (f).

Figure 27

Table 3. The parameters for the linear fittings related to figures 3, 11 and 12. The value of a is multiplied by  U∞2${\text{ U}}_{\mathit{\infty }}^{2}$ for clarity of presentation.Table 3 long description.

Figure 28

Figure 26. A linear fitting example of ln(E(x)) for G/D$G/D$ = 3 at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 1.06. The black dots and red dashed line denote the experimentally determined values of ln(E(x)) and the linear fitting for the initial growth of ln(E(x)), respectively.

Figure 29

Figure 27. Typical instants of phase-averaged vorticity contours at δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 0.53: (a) G/D$G/D$ = 1 of PIV1; (b) G/D$G/D$ = 2 of PIV1; (c) G/D$G/D$ = 1 of PIV3; (d) G/D$G/D$ = 2 of PIV3. The vortical structures with positive and negative vorticity are visualized by the λci isolines coloured black and red, respectively. The absolute values of these λci isolines are plotted from 1 with a uniform increment of 1. The scales of x and y axes are consistent.

Figure 30

Figure 28. Figure 28 long description.Trajectories (a) and circulation (b) of wake vortices and SV at G/D$G/D$ = 1 and δ0/D$\delta_0/D$ = 0.53. The absolute value of circulation is normalized by πDU∞.