Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T03:45:59.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence for specific adaptations of fossil benthic foraminifera to anoxic–dysoxic environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2015

Aaron Meilijson
Affiliation:
Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Post Office Box 653, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel. E-mail: shimon@bgu.ac.il, sigalabr@bgu.ac.il.
Sarit Ashckenazi-Polivoda
Affiliation:
Dead Sea and Arava Science Center, Neve Zohar, Dead Sea 86910, Israel. E-mail: sarit@adssc.org
Peter Illner
Affiliation:
Institute for Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Karlsruhe University 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany. E-mail: peter.illner@kit.edu
Heiko Alsenz
Affiliation:
Institute of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, Department of Environmental and Analytical Chemistry, Goethe-University, Altenhöferallee 1 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. E-mail: alsenz@iau.uni-frankfurt.de, puettmann@iau.uni-frankfurt.de
Robert P. Speijer
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B- 3001 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: robert.speijer@ees.kuleuven.be
Ahuva Almogi-Labin
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Israel, Malkhe Israel 30, Jerusalem 95501, Israel. E-mail: almogi@gsi.gov.il
Shimon Feinstein
Affiliation:
Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Post Office Box 653, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel. E-mail: shimon@bgu.ac.il, sigalabr@bgu.ac.il.
Wilhelm Püttmann
Affiliation:
Institute of Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, Department of Environmental and Analytical Chemistry, Goethe-University, Altenhöferallee 1 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. E-mail: alsenz@iau.uni-frankfurt.de, puettmann@iau.uni-frankfurt.de
Sigal Abramovich
Affiliation:
Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Post Office Box 653, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel. E-mail: shimon@bgu.ac.il, sigalabr@bgu.ac.il.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has generally been argued that the majority of fossil benthic foraminifera, the most common proxy for paleo bottom oceanic conditions, could not tolerate anoxia. Here we present evidence that fossil foraminifera were able to successfully colonize anoxic–dysoxic bottom waters, by using adaptations similar to those found in living species. Our study is based on a multi proxy micropaleontological and geochemical investigation of the Upper Cretaceous sediments from the Levant upwelling regime. A shift from buliminid to diverse trochospiral dominated assemblages was recorded in an interval with a distinct anoxic geochemical signature coinciding with a regional change in lithology. This change was triggered by an alteration in the type of primary producers from diatoms to calcareous nannoplankton, possibly causing modifications in benthic foraminiferal morphological and physiological adaptations to life in the absence of oxygen.

Our data show that massive blooms of triserial (buliminid) benthic foraminifera with distinct apertural and test morphologies during the Campanian were enabled by their ability to sequester diatom chloroplasts and associate with bacteria, in a similar manner as their modern analogs. Diverse trochospiral forms existed during the Maastrichtian by using nitrate instead of oxygen for their respiratory pathways in a denitrifying environment. Species belonging to the Stilostomellidae and Nodosariidae families might have been affected by the change in food type arriving to the seafloor after the phytoplankton turnover at the Campanian/Maastrichtian boundary, in a similar manner as their mid Pleistocene descendants prior to their extinction. This study promotes the need for a re-evaluation of the current models used for interpreting paleoceanographic data and demonstrates that the identification of adaptations and mechanisms involved in promoting sustained life under anoxic to dysoxic conditions should become a standard in faunal paleoceanographic studies.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 The Paleontological Society. All rights reserved 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Paleogeographic reconstruction showing the upwelling belts that developed along the Southern Tethys margin during the late Coniacian–Maastrichtian. The star marks the location of the study area (modified after Ashckenazi-Polivoda et al. 2011).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Location map of the studied sections projected on the Top Judea Group horizon structural map (Fleischer and Gafsou 2003). Black arrows represent the Syrian Arc structural pattern.

Figure 2

Figure 3 A–H, Selected images from the organic petrology analysis. A, (reflected light), sapropelic vitrinitic kerogen particle (SKgn) with slight granularity (Ro=0.32%); B, (reflected light), unicellular marine Tasmanales algae (Ta) (Ro=0.44%); C, (reflected light), an allochthonous fragment of inertinite (Int) showing open cell structure; Ghareb Formation, Shefela; D, (reflected UV light), a large dinoflagellate (Din); E, (reflected UV light), fluorescing amorphous matrix (Fl am) and a broken dinocyst fragment (Din); F, (reflected light), fecal pellets (Fec; Ro=0.252%), a bivalve fragment (Biv) is seen on the left, Q=quartz grain; lower Oil Shale Member, Negev; G, (reflected UV light), fluorescing sapropelinite (Sap); H, (transmitted light), amorphous kerogen resembling type II. I–L, selected images from the sedimentary petrology analysis. Photographs were taken under transmitted light. Ghareb Formation, Shefela, I, large uniserial foraminifera (Siphonodosaria; Uni); Mishash Formation, Shefela (J) and Negev (K) Phosphate grain (P); Ghareb Formation, Shefela; L, Peleoidal organic matter in a micritic matrix.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Rock Eval data (hydrogen and oxygen indexes) plotted on a Van Krevelen diagram showing a predominant type II kerogen.

Figure 4

Figure 5 Ion chromatogram of steranes (m/z 217) and terpanes (m/z 191) in bitumen extract from an Upper Cretaceous Ghareb Formation oil shale. Despite the relatively low thermal maturity, molecular parameters in the bituminous fraction such as very low Ts/(Ts+Tm), C35/C34 homohopanes >1, gammacerane (G) abundance (m/z 191) and regular/dia steranes and C28/C29 ratios (m/z 217) indicate lack of clastic contribution and an oxygen depleted depositional environment (Grantham and Wakefield 1988; Mello et al. 1988; Peters and Moldowan 1991). The abundance of which reflects stratified water and restricted circulation at the depositional area (Sinninghe Damsté et al. 1995).

Figure 5

Figure 6 Representative X ray diffraction results from the Aderet (AD) and PAMA (OSP, SAOA) samples, and X ray diffraction histogram (Sample AD-394).

Figure 6

Figure 7 Lithological and geochemical data from the Shefela and Negev basins. A, regional age (determined using planktic foraminifera), Stage, Formation, and biozone columns are reproduced from Meilijson et al. (2014). B, data from the Shefela basin (the Aderet core); Depth, lithology column and SR (sedimentation rates) are from Meilijson et al. (2014); TOC (total organic carbon); TE (trace elements) oxygen ranking—the curve represents an interpretation of the trace element factor analysis, using redox sensitive elements for describing unitless changes in oxygen content (see caption Fig. 8 for details); stable isotope records of δ13Corg and δ15Norg (isotope data for the Negev basin is from Schneider-Mor et al. 2012); Pristane/Phytane (Pr/Ph) ratio. C, data from the Negev basin (combined section of the Saraf and PAMA outcrops). Depth scale is linearly accommodated according to the regional ages. Columns are as in (B).

Figure 7

Figure 8 Trace elements analyses (representative data in Fig. 8A) have been interpreted by means of multivariate statistical methods in order to assess the inter element relationships. The calculated factor loadings are shown in Figure 8B in the form of horizontal bars. Only factor loadings that show values higher than 0.7 were used. The largest two eigenvalues were found to account for 82% of the total variance. Thereby, two factors have been selected. Factor 1 summarizes 44% of the total variance, that is characterized by elements with high positive factor loadings for Fe2O3(t), TiO2, Co, Ga, K2O, Rb, V, MnO, and SiO2. Only CaO comprises a negative sign, but with a high absolute value. This factor may be interpreted as a combined interplay between terrigenic and biogenic (carbonate) sedimentation. Factor 2 accounts for 38% of the total variance and mirrors the degree of bottom water oxygenation (Cu, Ni, Zn, Cr, S, Corg). However, this factor also includes elements that might represent conditions that promote phosphorite deposition (Y, As). The oxygen index is used for interpreting changes in the paleo bottom water oxygen content. The validity of the oxygen index as calculated by the trace element analysis is further established by its high correlation with TOC values (r=0.94, p>0.05; Fig. 8C), i.e., with low TOC levels correlating with increased oxygen levels and visa versa.

Figure 8

Figure 9 Faunal and environmental variations in the Shefela and Negev basins. A, regional data after Meilijson et al. (2014): Santonian (Sant.), Dicarinella asymetrica (D. asym.), Contusotruncana plummerae (C. plumm). B, data from the Shefela basin, Aderet core; sedimentation rates (SR), total organic carbon (TOC), benthic foraminifera specimens/gram dry sediment (BFN), relative abundance of the R mode clusters. C, Negev area (Saraf, Almogi-Labin et al. 1993; PAMA, Ashckenazi-Polivoda et al. 2011) depth scale is linearly accommodated according to the regional ages. D, faunal shift from biserial/triserial to trochospiral and uniserial dominated foraminiferal assemblages in the TOC rich zone following the Campanian/Maastrichtian boundary. Phytoplankton dominance is evaluated based on published biomarker records in Jordan (Sinninghe Damsté et al. 1990). Elhasaella alanwoodi (E. A), alkylthiophene (alk.).

Figure 9

Figure 10 Relative abundances of the 25 groups used for statistical R mode cluster analysis. Faunal clusters A (A1, A2), B (B1, B2) and C (C1, C2) are indicated. Lithology column legend appears in Figure 7. Data shown is from the Aderet core, which provides the most comprehensive cover of the cumulative depositional time interval.

Figure 10

Table 1 Representative and dominant (>5%) species in the three clustered assemblages. Number in brackets refers to the specie’s picture in Fig. 11.

Figure 11

Figure 11 A–C, SEM micrographs of the R mode clusters demonstrating strong morphologic homogeneity (nomenclature of the dominant species; Table 1). A, biserial and triserial. B, trochospiral; B1, smooth tests; B2, perforated by macro pores. C, mainly uniserial. D, morphological adaptations for kleptoplastidy and bacterial symbiosis; Cretaceous. 19–20, loop shaped line of teeth surrounding the aperture and a toothplate (P. prolixa). 21, serrated toothplate (Praebulimina sp). 22, toothplate and double folded lip aperture (N. canadensis). 23, surface covered with tiny pustules and pores (P. prolixa). Recent (24–25 from Austin et al. 2005). 24, Haynesina germanica with a large diatom feeding bundle. 25, teeth like tubercles (H. germanica). 26–28, from Bernhard and Bowser 1999. 26, double lip aperture and tooth plate (Bulimina elegantissima). 27, teeth lining the entire aperture (Nonionella stella). 28, empty diatom frustule and apertural teeth (N. stella). 29–30, from Bernhard et al. 2010. 29, surface pores (Bolivina pacifica). 30, close up of two pores of B. pacifica showing bacterial ectobionts.