Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T22:33:43.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Progress in nanoinformatics and informational materials science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2018

Atsuto Seko
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Japan; seko@cms.mtl.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Kazuaki Toyoura
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kyoto University, Japan; toyoura.kazuaki.5r@kyoto-u.ac.jp
Shunsuke Muto
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability, and Ultra-High Voltage Electron Microscopy Laboratory, Nagoya University, Japan; smuto@imass.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Teruyasu Mizoguchi
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Japan; teru@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Scott Broderick
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Design and Innovation, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, USA; scottbro@buffalo.edu

Abstract

Data-centric approaches have become increasingly popular in materials science, also known as informational materials science. Nanostructures often play essential roles in materials properties. Nanoinformatics is an important subset of informational materials science and a powerful tool for characterization and design of nanostructures. It allows discovery of meaningful and useful information and patterns from experimental and theoretical data and databases. This article reviews progress in nanoinformatics and informational materials science. Data-centric approaches for materials property description, construction of interatomic potentials, discovery of new inorganic compounds, efficient characterization of ionic transport and interfacial structures, hyperspectral image data analysis, and design of catalytic nanoparticles are outlined.

Information

Type
Data-Centric Science for Materials Innovation
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Flowchart of the machine-learning method based on the Gaussian process, dynamic programming, and Bayesian optimization frameworks for preferential evaluation of several dominant points primarily characterizing an atomic transport of interest.14 Note: PE, potential energy; PES, potential energy surface; DFT, density functional theory.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Schematics of interface structure searching using the virtual screening method.16 Note: DFT, density functional theory; MD, molecular dynamics.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Schematic representation of the nonnegative tensor factorization concept for a 3D tensor case.24–26 The tensor X stores two types of spectroscopic data concurrently recorded at the sampling points of (x, y). Each data point of a 3D data cube, xklm, is described as ${x_{klm}} = \mathop \sum \limits_i {{\rm{\lambda }}_i}a_k^{(i)}b_l^{(i)}S_m^{(i)}$ for a given number of components. Each of the terms in the sum is a data cube, where the information along each mode can be described by a single vector, the resolved matrices, S, A, B storing isolated spectral components and their spatial abundances, respectively.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Informatics-driven expansion of nanocatalyst knowledge base. (a) Dimensionality reduction approach was used to identify the target descriptors and catalytic reactions, and to ensure that the descriptor base captures the governing physics. (b) From the reduced descriptor space, quantitative structure–property relationships were developed for predicting the binding energy (BE) as a function of nanoparticle chemistry, which expanded the data measurements by an order of magnitude with high confidence. Reprinted with permission from Reference 30. © 2014 AIP Publishing. Note: PC, principal component; Dc, d-band center of the bimetallic cluster; Γmelt, average melting temperature; σ, strain on the surface plane; W, average work function; Z, average atomic number; δEN, difference in electronegativities of the metals composing the bimetallic.