Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:47:02.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of a decade of treatments to reduce invasive buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2023

Yue M. Li
Affiliation:
Conservation Research Scientist, Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson, AZ, USA; Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, Tucson, AZ, USA
Seth M. Munson*
Affiliation:
Research Ecologist, U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
Ya-Ching Lin
Affiliation:
GIS Specialist, Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson, AZ, USA
Perry Grissom
Affiliation:
Restoration Ecologist, Saguaro National Park, National Park Service, Tucson, AZ, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Seth M. Munson, Research Ecologist, U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, 2255 N. Gemini Drive, Flagstaff, AZ 86001. Email: smunson@usgs.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The invasion of nonnative grasses threatens biodiversity and ecosystem function globally through competition with native plant species and increases to wildfire frequency and intensity. Management actions to reduce buffelgrass [Pennisetum ciliare (L.) Link], an invasive warm-season perennial bunchgrass, are widely implemented, with chemical and mechanical treatments extending over two decades within Saguaro National Park in the Sonoran Desert of North America. We assessed how the effectiveness of treatments to reduce P. ciliare cover spanning from 2011 to 2020 were influenced by stage of invasion, treatment type and intensity, and environmental conditions. An increase in treatment effectiveness was largely explained by high initial cover of P. ciliare, an indicator of a late invasion stage and associated with high treatment intensity. Treatments had potential to be effective in patches as small as 0.3-m2 P. ciliare canopy per 400-m−2 area (<0.001% canopy cover) across treatment types and environmental gradients. Chemical treatments had higher or equal effectiveness compared with mechanical treatments, and greater reductions in P. ciliare were associated with shorter average years of treatment interruptions, or gaps, and to a lesser degree, total years of treatment. In many cases, P. ciliare was reduced with as little as 2 yr of treatment, but more than 3 average years of treatment gap could result in reduced treatment effectiveness. There was generally higher treatment effectiveness on shallow slopes, north- and east-facing aspects, and on higher elevations within one district of the park. Our findings highlight that resource-intensive treatments in all but the smallest patches of P. ciliare have largely been effective. Further opportunities for improvement include more frequent surveillance, limiting treatment gaps to ≤3 yr in areas of low P. ciliare cover, and comparison of treated with untreated areas.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
This is a work of the US Government and is not subject to copyright protection within the United States. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America
Copyright
© US Geological Survey, 2023
Figure 0

Figure 1. The study area includes the two districts of Saguaro National Park, the Tucson Mountain District (TMD) and the Rincon Mountain District (RMD). The districts are separated by the Tucson Basin, which includes the city of Tucson, and are generally within the Sonoran Desert (A). The TMD (B) and RMD (C) have diverse topography and received different intensities of treatments from 2011 to 2020 (green dots), generally in low elevations in the park where Pennisetum ciliare has spread.

Figure 1

Table 1. Final generalized least-squares (GLS) model results with the fractions of variance explained by each significant variable and the total variance explained by all significant variables combined (model total).a

Figure 2

Figure 2. The effectiveness of Pennisetum ciliare treatment, as indicated by the treatment effectiveness index and change in P. ciliare cover (+, increase; −, decrease), following chemical and mechanical treatment in (A) the Rincon Mountain District (RMD) and (B) the Tucson Mountain District (TMD). Crosses indicate the mean effectiveness indices, and error bars indicate the 95% confidence intervals. Significant pair-wise differences between park district and treatment types are shown by different letters and in Supplementary Table S3.

Figure 3

Figure 3. The linear relationships between initial Pennisetum ciliare cover and treatment effectiveness (change in P. ciliare cover: +, increase; −, decrease) chemical and mechanical treatment in (A and B) the Rincon Mountain District (RMD) and (C and D) the Tucson Mountain District (TMD) predicted by the final models. Regression lines are marginal effects predicted by the final models.

Figure 4

Figure 4. The relationship between Pennisetum ciliare treatment effectiveness and treatment intensity expressed as total years of treatment (A and B) and average years of treatment gap (C and D) in the Rincon Mountain District (RMD) and (E) Tucson Mountain District (TMD). Crosses show the marginal effects predicted by the selected models and error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. Only significant relationships selected by the final models are shown in the figure. Significant pair-wise differences among treatment intensity levels are shown by different letters and in Supplementary Tables S4 and S5.

Figure 5

Figure 5. The relationship between Pennisetum ciliare treatment effectiveness and (A) topographic slope in Rincon Mountain District (RMD) with mechanical treatment, (B) topographic slope in Tucson Mountain District (TMD) with chemical and (C) mechanical treatments, (D) eastness aspect in RMD with chemical treatment, (E) northness aspect and (F) elevation in TMD with chemical treatment. Only significant relationships selected by the final models are shown in the figure. Regression lines are marginal effects predicted by the final models.

Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material

Li et al. supplementary material

Download Li et al. supplementary material(File)
File 296.9 KB