Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T05:07:43.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compact bandpass-filtering response power divider with high-frequency selectivity and high isolation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2019

Jiawei Li
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering and Information Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China
Kaijun Song*
Affiliation:
EHF Key Laboratory of Science, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
Fei Xia
Affiliation:
EHF Key Laboratory of Science, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
Shema Richard Patience
Affiliation:
EHF Key Laboratory of Science, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
Song Guo
Affiliation:
EHF Key Laboratory of Science, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
Maoyu Fan
Affiliation:
EHF Key Laboratory of Science, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
*
Author for correspondence: Kaijun Song, E-mail: ksong@uestc.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A compact high-isolation power divider with bandpass response and high-frequency selectivity is presented in this letter. Two dual-mode resonators are used to realize filtering response. The circuit size of the proposed power divider can be reduced by using dual-mode capacitance loaded square meander loop resonators. Due to capacitive load, the resonator can exhibit slow-wave characteristics, which can be utilized to suppress harmonics and reduce size. The simulated and measured results show reasonable agreement.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Configuration of the proposed power divider (b) Coupling scheme.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simulated equivalent circuit of the proposed filtering power divider.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Equivalent circuit of the presented power divider: (a) even-mode circuit, (b) odd-mode circuit.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Equivalent transmission-line circuit model of the resonator.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Simulated S parameters with varied parameters (a) b (a = 14.5 mm, c = 0.4 mm, d = 2 mm, w0 = 1.11 mm, w1 = 0.5 mm, w2 = 0.6 mm, w3 = w4 = 0.2 mm, w5 = 1.6 mm, s1 = 4.5 mm, s2 = 1.9 mm, s3 = 3.3 mm, s4 = 1.7 mm, s5 = 10.6 mm, s6 = 1.89 mm, g0 = g1 = 0.1 mm, R = 100 ohm) and (b) c (a = 14.5 mm, b = 1.3 mm, d = 2 mm, w0 = 1.11 mm, w1 = 0.5 mm, w2 = 0.6 mm, w3 = w4 = 0.2 mm, w5 = 1.6 mm, s1 = 4.5 mm, s2 = 1.9 mm, s3 = 3.3 mm, s4 = 1.7 mm, s5 = 10.6 mm, s6 = 1.89 mm, g0 = g1 = 0.1 mm, R = 100 ohm).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Simulated and measured results of the proposed filtering power divider. (a) The photograph of fabricated power divider. (b) |S11|. (c) |S21|, and |S31|. (d) |S22|, | S23|.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Simulated and measured magnitude imbalance and phase difference between the two output ports.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Simulated and measured wide-band response of the proposed filtering power divider.

Figure 8

Table 1. Comparison of the proposed power divider with previous designs.