Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T15:22:38.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ceratiocaris from the Silurian Waukesha Biota, Wisconsin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2016

Wade T. Jones
Affiliation:
Kent State University, Department of Geology, McGilvrey Hall, Kent State University, Kent, OH, 44242, USA; 〈wjones23@kent.edu〉
Rodney M. Feldmann
Affiliation:
Kent State University, Department of Geology, McGilvrey Hall, Kent State University, Kent, OH, 44242, USA; 〈rfeldman@kent.edu〉
Carrie E. Schweitzer
Affiliation:
Kent State University, Department of Geology, Kent State University Stark Campus, 6000 Frank Avenue, N. W., Canton, OH, 44720; 〈cschweit@kent.edu〉

Abstract

Phyllocarids of the Waukesha Biota were systematically and taphonomically evaluated. Three Ceratiocaris species are present in the biota: C. macroura Collette and Rudkin, 2010; C. papilio Salter in Murchison, 1859; and C. pusilla Matthew, 1889. Specimens range in completeness from nearly complete, including the cephalic to caudal regions, to isolated telsons and furcae. Evidence of Salter’s position is present in only three specimens. Relatively complete specimens are interpreted to represent corpses, rather than molts; whereas specimens including only the pleon and caudal region, or caudal region, and specimens with evidence of Salter’s position likely represent exuviae. Specimens are preserved essentially as compression fossils exhibiting two types of preserved cuticle: brown inner cuticle, which tends to be impressed over the topography of bedding planes on which specimens are preserved, and blue-gray phosphatized cuticle exhibiting sub-millimeter scale relief. Cuticle phosphatization likely occurred during early diagenesis. The presence of characteristic near-shore species and C. pusilla, only known from turbidite facies, interpreted to possibly represent a marine trough, suggests that the Waukesha phyllocarid assemblage might represent a transported assemblage, rather than a biota, or that C. pusilla from the Jones Creek Formation was transported basinward in sediment gravity flows.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 
Figure 0

Figure 1Ceratiocaris macroura Collette and Rudkin, 2010. (1, 2) UWGM 1923 part, counterpart, with explanatory line drawing, scale=10 mm; (3) close-up of anterior carapace and mandible, with explanatory line drawing, scale=3 mm; (4, 5) UWGM 1916 part, counterpart, scale=3 mm; (6) UWGM 1906, scale=10 mm; (7) UWGM 1906, close-up of anterior carapace and partial antenna; An=antenna, CF=furca, LCV=left carapace valve, RCV=right carapace valve, Te=telson, Th=thorax, Ro=rostrum, IP=incisor process, De=denticulation, ACM=anterior carapace margin.

Figure 1

Figure 2Ceratiocaris macroura Collette and Rudkin, 2010. (1, 2) UWGM 1907 part, counterpart, arrow indicates the same backfilled burrow as in 1.5, scale=10 mm; (3) close-up of carapace cuticle showing gradation from fine striae to nested scale-like pits, scale=1 mm; (4) close-up of rostrum showing coarse striae, scale=1 mm; (5) close-up of carapace cuticle showing gradation of ornamentation and crosscutting backfilled burrows, corresponding to 1.2, arrow indicates position of backfilled burrow; (6) close-up of carapace cuticle showing detail of nested scale-like pits, corresponding to 1.2; (7) close-up of eye and ocular peduncle, corresponding to 1.1, scale=1 mm; (8) close-up of exceptionally preserved portion of eye, ommatidial lenses indicated by arrows, scale=1 mm.

Figure 2

Figure 3Ceratiocaris papilio Salter in Murchison, 1859. (1) UWGM 1926, with explanatory line drawing, scale=1 mm; (2) UWGM 741 with explanatory line drawing, counterpart UWGM 1905 not figured, scale=10 mm; (3, 4) UWGM 1917, scale=1 mm, MaP=mandibular palp, Pp=pleopod, ThP=thoracopod.

Figure 3

Figure 4Ceratiocaris papilio Salter in Murchison, 1859. (1) UWGM 741, close-up of pleonite VI showing ornamentation, scale=1 mm; (2) UWGM 1910, counterpart not figured, scale=10 mm; (3) UWGM 1926, close-up of ornamentation on pleonite VII, scale=1 mm; (4) UWGM 1924, scale=2 mm; (5) UWGM, 1925, counterpart, UWGM 1922 not figured, showing dorsal striae, scale=2 mm.

Figure 4

Figure 5Ceratiocaris pusilla Matthew, 1889. (1, 2) UWGM 1909, part, counterpart, Pp=pleopod, scale=10 mm; (3, 4) Close-up of caudal region showing details of furca and telson, CF=furca, Te=telson, scale=10 mm; (5, 6) UWGM 1913, scale=2 mm.

Figure 5

Figure 6Ceratiocaris pusilla Matthew, 1889. (1) UWGM 1912 showing evidence of Salter’s position, scale=3 mm; (2) UWGM 1918 showing evidence of Salter’s position, scale=3 mm; (3) UWGM 1929, scale=3 mm; (4) UWGM 1911 showing ventrally reflexed rostrum, scale=5 mm.

Figure 6

Figure 7EDAX results for UWGM 1904. (1) Entire specimen showing brown and blue-gray cuticle, and area included in the EDAX results, scale=3 mm; (2) close-up of cuticle corresponding to EDAX results, with elemental maps.

Figure 7

Table 1Paleoenvironmental occurrences of Ceratiocaris macroura Collette and Rudkin, 2010; Ceratiocaris papilio Salter in Murchison, 1859; and Ceratiocaris pusilla Matthew, 1889.