Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T20:21:25.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: high prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2012

J. P. DUBEY*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, Animal and Natural Resources Institute, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Building 1001, BARC-East, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350, USA
E. G. LAGO
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics/Neonatology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul School of Medicine, Av. Ipiranga 6690, CEP 90610-000, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
S. M. GENNARI
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87, Cidade Universitária, CEP 05508-270, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
C. SU
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA
J. L. JONES
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, N.E., MS A-06, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
*
*Corresponding author: USDA, ARS, ANRI, APDL, BARC-East, Building 1001, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA. Tel: +1 301 504 8128. Fax: +1 301 504 9222. E-mail: jitender.dubey@ars.usda.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Infections by the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii are widely prevalent in humans and animals in Brazil. The burden of clinical toxoplasmosis in humans is considered to be very high. The high prevalence and encouragement of the Brazilian Government provides a unique opportunity for international groups to study the epidemiology and control of toxoplasmosis in Brazil. Many early papers on toxoplasmosis in Brazil were published in Portuguese and often not available to scientists in English-speaking countries. In the present paper we review prevalence, clinical spectrum, molecular epidemiology, and control of T. gondii in humans and animals in Brazil. This knowledge should be useful to biologists, public health workers, veterinarians, and physicians. Brazil has a very high rate of T. gondii infection in humans. Up to 50% of elementary school children and 50–80% of women of child-bearing age have antibodies to T. gondii. The risks for uninfected women to acquire toxoplasmosis during pregnancy and fetal transmission are high because the environment is highly contaminated with oocysts. The burden of toxoplasmosis in congenitally infected children is also very high. From limited data on screening of infants for T. gondii IgM at birth, 5–23 children are born infected per 10 000 live births in Brazil. Based on an estimate of 1 infected child per 1000 births, 2649 children with congenital toxoplasmosis are likely to be born annually in Brazil. Most of these infected children are likely to develop symptoms or signs of clinical toxoplasmosis. Among the congenitally infected children whose clinical data are described in this review, several died soon after birth, 35% had neurological disease including hydrocephalus, microcephaly and mental retardation, 80% had ocular lesions, and in one report 40% of children had hearing loss. The severity of clinical toxoplasmosis in Brazilian children may be associated with the genetic characteristics of T. gondii isolates prevailing in animals and humans in Brazil.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of Brazil with 5 regions and distribution of human population, and sources of Toxoplasma gondii isolates genotyped. Figures in parenthesis are millions of people and % of the total population. State abbreviation—(population million, %): AC – Acre (0·7, 0·38%), AL – Alagoas (3·1, 1·64%), AM – Amazonas (3·4, 1·83%), AP – Amapá (0·6, 0·35%), BA – Bahia (14·0, 7·35%), CE – Ceará (8·4, 4·43%), DF – Distrito Federal (2·5,1·35%), ES – Espírito Santo (3·5, 1·84%), GO – Goiás (6·0, 3·15%), MA – Maranhão (6·5, 3·45%) MS – Mato Grosso do Sul (2·4, 1·28%) MG – Minas Gerais (19·5, 10·27%), MT – Mato Grosso (3·0, 1·59%) PA – Pará (7·5, 3·97%), PB – Paraíba (3·7, 1·97%), PE – Pernambuco (8·7, 4·61%), PI – Piauí (3·1, 1·63%), PR – Paraná (10·4, 5·48%), RN – Rio Grande do Norte (3·2, 1·66%), RJ – Rio de Janeiro (15·9, 8·38%), RO – Rondônia (1·5, 0·82%), RR – Roraima (0·4, 0·24%), RS – Rio Grande do Sul (10·6, 5·60%), SC – Santa Catarina (6·2, 3·28%) SE – Sergipe (2·0, 1·08%) SP – São Paulo (41·2, 21·63%) TO – Tocantins (1·3, 0·73%).

Figure 1

Table 1. Historical landmarks of Toxoplasma gondii and toxoplasmosis in Brazil

Figure 2

Table 2. Serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in the general population in Brazil

Figure 3

Table 3. Serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in children in Brazil

Figure 4

Table 4. Serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant/delivering, or child-bearing aged women in Brazil

Figure 5

Table 5. Prevalence of congenital toxoplasmosis in Brazil

Figure 6

Table 6. Clinical toxoplasmosis in congenitally-infected children in Brazil

Figure 7

Table 7. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in domestic cats in Brazil

Figure 8

Table 8. Serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in free-range chickens from different states, counties or areas of Brazil

Figure 9

Table 9. Serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in pigs in Brazil

Figure 10

Table 10. Isolation of viable Toxoplasma gondii from animals in Brazil

Figure 11

Table 11. Serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in sheep in Brazil

Figure 12

Table 12. Serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in goats in Brazil

Figure 13

Table 13. Serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in miscellaneous domestic animals in Brazil

Figure 14

Table 14. Genotyping of 363 Toxoplasma gondii isolates from Brazil

Figure 15

Fig. 2. Pairwise Fst of six Toxoplasma gondii populations from different hosts from São Paulo state, Brazil. Comparison of the populations was conducted using Arlequin ver 3.5. Statistical significance is determined at P = 0·01. The ‘ + ’ sign indicates significant difference between two populations, whereas ‘ − ’ indicates insignificance. The heat map indicates the Fst value.

Figure 16

Table 15. Basic statistics of 6 Toxoplasma gondii populations from São Paulo state, Brazil

Supplementary material: File

Dubey supplementary table 1

Dubey supplementary table 1

Download Dubey supplementary table 1(File)
File 26.8 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Dubey supplementary figure

Dubey supplementary figure

Download Dubey supplementary figure(Image)
Image 228.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dubey supplementary table 2

Dubey supplementary table 2

Download Dubey supplementary table 2(File)
File 12.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dubey supplementary table 3

Dubey supplementary table 3

Download Dubey supplementary table 3(File)
File 16.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dubey supplementary table 4

Dubey supplementary table 4

Download Dubey supplementary table 4(File)
File 16.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dubey supplementary table 5

Dubey supplementary table 5

Download Dubey supplementary table 5(File)
File 31.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dubey supplementary table 6

Dubey supplementary table 6

Download Dubey supplementary table 6(File)
File 21.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dubey supplementary table 7

Dubey supplementary table 7

Download Dubey supplementary table 7(File)
File 148.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dubey supplementary table 8

Dubey supplementary table 8

Download Dubey supplementary table 8(File)
File 161.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Dubey supplementary table 9

Dubey supplementary table 9

Download Dubey supplementary table 9(File)
File 40.4 KB