Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T01:53:41.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pliocene–Pleistocene sedimentary development of the syntectonic Polis graben, NW Cyprus: evidence from facies analysis, nannofossil biochronology and strontium isotope dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2018

ELIZABETH M. BALMER*
Affiliation:
School of GeoSciences, Grant Institute, University of Edinburgh, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, UK
ALASTAIR H. F. ROBERTSON
Affiliation:
School of GeoSciences, Grant Institute, University of Edinburgh, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, UK
ISABELLA RAFFI
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria e Geotecnologie (InGeo), CeRSGeoUniversità degli Studi ‘G. d'Annunzio’ di Chieti-Pescara Campus Universitario, via dei Vestini 31 66013 Chieti Scalo, Italy
DICK KROON
Affiliation:
School of GeoSciences, Grant Institute, University of Edinburgh, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, UK
*
†Author for correspondence: b7elizabeth@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recently uplifted and exposed Pliocene and Pleistocene sedimentary infill of the neotectonic Polis graben provides an excellent opportunity to understand extensional basin development in a marine setting. Fieldwork, facies analysis and dating using nannofossils and strontium isotopes reveal how the sedimentary conditions evolved during infill of the Polis graben during Pliocene and Pleistocene time, and allow a composite succession for the depocentre to be determined for the first time. Six lithofacies are recognized in the northern Polis graben, allowing evolving palaeoenvironments to be inferred. By the end of Miocene time (Messinian) a major c. N–S-trending graben was established; extensional faulting continued during the Pliocene–Pleistocene until recent time. Post-Messinian salinity crisis deposition began with deposition of hemipelagic muds (c. 5.08–2.76 Ma), equivalent to the Nicosia Formation. This was followed by upwards incoming of repeated normal-graded bioclastic carbonates (couplets) (c. 2.76–1.6 Ma), which are interpreted as age-equivalents of the Athalassa Formation elsewhere in Cyprus. The upwards sudden facies change is explained by tectonically controlled shallowing which enabled neritic carbonate production on the basin margins. The appearance of basement-derived material (e.g. ophiolitic extrusive detritus) in the highest stratigraphic levels of the basin fill in the north (c. 1.7–1.6 Ma) reflects onset of rapid surface uplift focused on the Troodos ophiolitic massif. Overall, the syntectonic basin infill appears to document a two-stage, pulsed uplift related to early-stage collision of the African and Eurasian plates in the easternmost Mediterranean region.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Summary tectonic map of the Eastern Mediterranean region for the Pleistocene Epoch with an inset map of Cyprus. Half arrows indicate directions of regional strike-slip. Barbed lines indicate subduction zones. Large filled arrows indicate convergence directions. Large unfilled arrows indicate regional tectonic escape. The position of the Polis graben is highlighted by the box in the inset map. Modified from McCay & Robertson (2013).

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Looking NE across the northern part of the Polis graben, showing the boundary between the Pliocene sediments located near the graben axis and the hilly Miocene outcrop on the eastern flank of the graben. (b) Age and stratigraphy within the northern part of the Polis graben (adapted from Payne & Robertson, 1995), indicating the prior stratigraphy to be tested; m – unnamed Messinian non-marine facies. (c) Structural cross-sections of the Polis graben; thick lines, first-order faults (dashed, inferred); reproduced from A. Payne, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh (1995). (d) Hill composed of a thick exposure of Pliocene calcarenite with Miocene sedimentary rocks in the distance. (e) Contact between hemipelagic mudstone and sandstone in the northern, axial part of the Polis graben.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Outline geological map of NW Cyprus based on the 1:250,000 Geological Map of Cyprus, published by the Cyprus Geological Survey Department, Nicosia (Constantinou, 1995) with the faults (dotted line) and inferred faults (dashed line) indicated. The distribution of the Nicosia and Athalassa formations are modified based on this study. (*Pakhna formation includes the Koronia and Terra members.) The simplified first-order (bold line) and second-order (faint line) faults indicated are adapted from A. Payne, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1995.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Distribution of local sections logged throughout the study area. Nannofossil age ranges are in italics (red), strontium isotopic age ranges in roman text (blue) and the assigned age given in parentheses. Most ages are within analytical error of each other; see Section 4 for further information on any discrepancies between ages. Preference is given to nannofossil ages. Stars (grey) to the left of the logs indicate the location of a dating sample. Log 16 is of an uncertain age (Messinian facies?). Facies codes are given on right-hand side of the logs as discussed in Section 6; see Table 3 for corresponding facies. Key on opposing page. Relate to Figure 3 for stratigraphy and structural details of reference map.

Figure 4

Table 1. Nannofossil biochronological results and 87Sr/86Sr isotopic data table. 87Sr/86Sr ages were obtained using Look-Up Table Version 4: 08/04 (Howarth & McArthur, 1997; McArthur, Howarth & Bailey, 2001). Samples are listed in order from north to south within the study area; samples collected on the graben flanks are indicated by [f].

Figure 5

Figure 5. Nannofossil biochronology age ranges and 87Sr/86Sr ages with error bars (see Table 1). The ages are plotted in order from the most northerly sample to the most southerly sample. Samples collected from the graben flanks are highlighted with a star and are considered separately from samples that were collected from near the N–S-aligned basin axis. Question marks represent samples which could not be clearly dated. Timescale from Cohen & Gibbard (2010) and Agnini et al. (2014).

Figure 6

Table 2. Nannofossil biostratigraphic and biochronologic results. Samples listed from north to south across the study area as in Figure 5. Biozones and biochronology are from Backman et al. (2012). CNPL – Calcareous Nannofossil Pliocene. Semiquantitative abundance evaluations obtained at magnification 1200× with polarizing microscope. Total abundance: 1, c. 10; 2, c. 20; and 3, >30 specimens in a single field of view. B – barren of nannofossils. Species abundances: 0, no specimen observed; A, >1 in specimen in each field of view; AA, dominant specimens in the assemblage; C, c. 1 specimen in 1–10 fields of view; F, c. 1 specimen every 10 fields of view; R, very few specimen in > 30 fields of view; VR, 1–2 specimens observed; cf., uncertain presence.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Shaded elevation map of the study area showing nannofossil age ranges (italics) and representative strontium isotopic age ranges (bold), with assigned ages in brackets. All ages and ranges are in Ma. Younger ages are in the north of the study area and at higher elevations. Older ages are in the south, near the basin axis and on the graben flanks.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Restored sedimentary succession for the northern part of the Polis graben (north of Polemi) from late Miocene time onwards, based on a combination of regional sediment dip (and therefore topographic height), measurement of local sedimentary logs (see Fig. 4), and nannofossil and strontium isotopic age dating (see Fig. 5). The approximate positions of some of the key local logs are indicated, based on the determined nannofossil age ranges as indicated on the stratigraphic column. The dashed line (red) indicates the inferred boundary between the Athalassa and the Nicosia formations.

Figure 9

Table 3. Summary of Pliocene and Pleistocene lithofacies and their inferred depositional environments in the northern part of the Polis graben.

Figure 10

Figure 8. Representative sedimentary logs of the lithofacies identified within the northern Polis graben area, with locations shown on the inset map, selected from a larger number of measured logs (see Fig. 4). Facies codes are given to the right of the sedimentary logs; see Table 3 for facies classification. Beside the logs the nannofossil age ranges are given in italics (red) and the strontium isotopic age ranges in roman text (blue), with assigned ages in parentheses. Most are within analytical error of each other, see Section 4 for further information on any discrepancies between ages. Preference is given to nannofossil ages. Stars to the left of the logs indicate where samples were taken for dating.

Figure 11

Figure 9. Photographs of key features of Facies A1 (hemipelagic mudstones) and Facies B1 (repeated normal-graded bioclastic couplets): (a) example of a short section of subfacies A1a (structureless hemipelagic mudstone); (b) Facies B1a3 (medium-bedded sandstone–mudstone couplets), with flute cast highlighted by box; (c) current-imbricated bivalve shells; (d) millimetre-thick laminations at the base of a grainstone bed; (e) upper part of a marl bed overlain by poorly sorted bioclast-rich grainstone; (f) lithic granules and mudstone rip-up clasts near the base of a grainstone bed; (g) very coarse-grained base of a calcarenite bed containing bivalve and scaphopod debris; (h) sub-rounded to rounded clasts of wackestone (impure chalk) within calcareous mudstone; (i) vertical and horizontal burrow traces. Hammer length: c. 30 cm; pencil length: c. 15 cm; car key length: c. 8 cm.

Figure 12

Figure 10. Photographs of the key features of Facies B1 (repeated normal-graded bioclastic couplets), Facies C1 (sandstones), Facies D1 (organized conglomerate) and Facies E1 (disorganized breccia). (a) Thick-bedded, down-cutting channel of subfacies C1c (massive normal-graded pebbly sandstone). (b) Scoured base of the channel downcutting into underlying subfacies B1a (bioclastic sand–mud couplets). Note the soft-sediment mobilization of the underlying marl. (c) Gutter cast eroded into marl and infilled with bioclastic carbonate. (d) Cross-stratified sandstone with cream-coloured concretionary layers. (e) Irregular concretionary layer within Facies C1 (sandstones). (f) Matrix-supported calcirudite (carbonate conglomerate) with poorly sorted clasts of reworked pelagic material within a carbonate matrix. (g) Poorly sorted carbonate breccia of Facies E1 containing bioclastic and terrigenous material, overlying subfacies A1c (laminated hemipelagic mudstones). (h) Angular clasts of reworked bioclastic grainstone within a fine to coarse-grained bioclastic-rich matrix. (i) Cemented bivalve shell present within bioclastic grainstone clast. Pen length c. 15 cm, hammer length: c. 30 cm; object length in (f): c. 8 cm.

Figure 13

Figure 11. Photomicrographs of redeposited carbonate material within Facies B1 (repeated normal-graded bioclastic couplets) and Facies C1 (sandstones): (a) echinoderm spine; (b) bivalve shell; (c) fragment of oyster shell; (d) calcareous red algae; (e) serpulid worm tubes with algal growth on the inner tube (S) and also polycrystalline quartz (Pq); (f) gastropod (G) and polycrystalline quartz (Pq); (g) planktonic foraminifera; Globigerinidae (G); (h–l) Benthic foraminifera: (h) Rotaliidae (R); (i) Eponides (E) and calcareous red algae (Ca); (j) Anomalina (A) and Textulariidae (T); (k) Amphistigina; (l) Miliolida. All photographs taken under cross-polarized light, other than (g) which was taken under plane-polarized light.

Figure 14

Figure 12. Photomicrographs of reworked carbonate and lithoclastic material within Facies B1 (repeated normal-graded bioclastic couplets) and Facies C1 (sandstones). (a) Wackestone (pelagic carbonate) with abundant planktonic foraminifera (Globigerinidae). (b) Reworked, rounded micritic intraclast in bioclastic carbonate. (c) Reworked grain of wackestone with densely packed planktonic foraminifera (suggestive of redeposition prior to reworking). (d) Sub-rounded lithoclast of microcrystalline quartzitic chert (Cht) together with a large quartz grain (Qz) in a calcareous matrix. (e) Lithoclast of quartzite with recrystallized quartz (Qz) and highly altered basalt (B) in a calcareous matrix. (f) Highly altered basalt (B), volcanic glass with micro-phenocrysts of plagioclase (Gl) and bivalve fragments (Bi) in a calcareous matrix. (g) Clinopyroxene grains (Cpx) within mainly bioclastic carbonate. (h) Plagioclase (P) and quartz grains (Qz) within a mixed siliciclastic-carbonate rock. (i) Altered diabase (Db), clinopyroxene (C), plagioclase (P) and quartz (Qz) within partly recrystallized carbonate. (j) Foraminiferal-rich grainstone of subfacies B1a3 (medium-bedded sandstone–mudstone couplets) with benthic foraminifera (Bf) and planktonic foraminifera (Pf). (k) Lithoclastic-rich subfacies C1a (organized parallel-stratified sandstone) with altered diabase (Db), altered basalt (B), clinopyroxene (C) and volcanic glass (Gl) fragments, some of which contain micro-phenocrysts of plagioclase. All photographs taken under cross-polarized light, except (b) and (c) which are under plane-polarized light.

Figure 15

Figure 13. Synoptic line diagrams and photographs illustrating the extensional faulting observed on the western (a–c) and eastern (d–f) graben flank. (a) Miocene and Pliocene sediments are downthrown (by hundreds of metres) by normal faulting (western flank). (b) Down-faulted (bold) Miocene sediments (on right of photograph) subsequently underwent further extensional faulting, creating stepped Miocene fault blocks (western flank). (c) Faulted Pliocene and Pleistocene sediments on the western flank of the graben (Pleistocene age is based on lithological correlation, but requires dating for confirmation). (d) Pliocene sediments are downthrown by a normal fault exposing Miocene below (eastern flank). (e) Photograph of two extensional faults and a related fault scarp on the eastern flank of the graben, where downfaulted Pliocene sediments expose the fault scarp. (f) Pliocene sediments downthrown exposing a prominent fault scarp, highlighted by dashed line. F – faulting.

Figure 16

Figure 14. Block diagrams illustrating the generalized depositional (syn-rift) and tectonic settings of the northern part of the Polis graben during: (a) early–late Pliocene; (b) late Pliocene – early Pleistocene; and (c) early–middle Pleistocene time. No details are shown for the southern basin as it is outside the scope of research. Some sediment appears to have been redeposited from the flanks of the graben; however, the main supply is likely to have been from the SE with northwards near-axial flow within the area studied (see Fig. 15). The transverse structure influences sediment deposition, including the supply of clastic sediment. The graben morphology is adapted from A. Payne, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1995.

Figure 17

Figure 15. Outline palaeogeographic map of the Polis graben area with the geology of western Cyprus indicated (see Fig. 3 for corresponding ages and formations). The narrow carbonate shelf shown around the periphery of the basin and its hinterland were the source of compositionally varied sediment within the Pleistocene bioclastic couplets (dashed arrows). Late-stage Pleistocene sandstones are shown as being preferentially sourced via the transfer zone (near Sarama) (solid arrow). The faults (dotted line), inferred faults (dashed line) and geological map are adapted from the 1: 250,000 Geological Map of Cyprus, published by the Cyprus Geological Survey Department, Nicosia (Constantinou, 1995). The simplified first-order (bold line) and second-order (faint line) faults indicated are adapted from A. Payne, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1995.

Supplementary material: File

Balmer et al. supplementary material 1

Balmer et al. supplementary material

Download Balmer et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 49.5 KB