Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:31:31.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selective laser sintering of polymer biocomposites based on polymethyl methacrylate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

Rajkumar Velu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, AUT University, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
Sarat Singamneni*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, AUT University, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: sarat.singamneni@aut.ac.nz

Abstract

Materials and processes used for medical applications should have specific attributes. For bone repair and reconstruction, controlled open porosity and osteoconductivity are essential apart from mechanical strength and biocompatibility. Several forms of calcium phosphates are often used for these applications, considering properties similar to bone minerals, but often in combinations with other biopolymers. Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) are identified as a suitable combination for the current research, considering specific properties both individually and in combinations, when processed by different means for specific medical applications. Specific responses of the biocomposite material formed by mechanically mixing the two materials in the powder form to selective laser sintering (SLS) under varying conditions are investigated. The results indicate the suitability of the material system for SLS, while controlled porosity and mechanical property combinations are possible by optimizing material composition and process parameters.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. SEM micrograph of PMMA powders mixed with (a) 10% and (b) 20% β-TCP.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. SEM photographs of the sintered single layer with PMMA 10% TCP composite with laser power of 22.8 W and varying scan speeds (a) s = 508 mm/s; (b) s = 381 mm/s; (c) s = 254 mm/s.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Effects of process parameters (a) laser power and (b) laser scan speed on critical responses (10% TCP composite powder).

Figure 3

FIG. 4. SEM photographs of the sintered single layer with PMMA + 20% β-TCP composite powders. (a) P = 18 W, s = 508 mm/s; (b) P = 18 W, s = 254 mm/s.

Figure 4

TABLE I. Experimental condition with specific energy densities and general observations.

Figure 5

FIG. 5. SEM photographs of sintered PMMA–β-TCP composite single layer samples with varying EDs, laser power, and scan speed. (a) ED = 0.1 J/mm2, P = 22.8 W, s = 422.17 mm/s; (b) ED = 0.12 J/mm2, P = 22.8 W, s = 352 mm/s; (c) ED = 0.14 J/mm2, P = 22.8 W, s = 300 mm/s; (d) ED = 0.16 J/mm2, P = 22.8 W, s = 263 mm/s.

Figure 6

TABLE II. Surface morphologies of single-layer samples sintered with higher power settings.

Figure 7

FIG. 6. SEM photographs of sintered PMMA + β-TCP composites with varying process parameters with power settings in the higher ranges. (a1) P = 37.2 W, s = 711 mm/s; (a2) P = 39.6 W, s = 762 mm/s; (a3) P = 42 W, s = 812 mm/s for ED = 0.1 J/mm2. (b1) P = 37.2 W, s = 635 mm/s; (b2) P = 39.6 W, s = 655 mm/s; (b3) P = 42 W, s = 736 mm/s for ED = 0.12 J/mm2; (c1) P = 37.2 W, s = 457 mm/s; (c2) P = 39.6 W, s = 482 mm/s; (c3) P = 42 W, s = 508 mm/s for ED = 0.14 J/mm2.

Figure 8

FIG. 7. Uncontrolled porosity in sintered samples (a) resulting from insufficient melting and fusion, and (b1, b2) due to gas pickup.

Figure 9

FIG. 8. SEM photographs of sintered layer with 10% β-TCP with varying laser power (a1) 37 W, (a2) 40 W, (a3) 42 W, (a4) 45 W and (b) 20% β-TCP particles.

Figure 10

FIG. 9. SEM micrograph of the cross-section of sintered layer (a1, a2) 10% β-TCP and (b1, b2) 20% β-TCP composites.