Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:07:47.183Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted copper ion removal from polluted water by a natural clinoptilolite nanostructure through a central composite design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2019

Mohsen Sheydaei*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry, Kharazmi University, 15719-14911Tehran, Iran
Ali Balanejad Gasemsoltanlu
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry, Kharazmi University, 15719-14911Tehran, Iran
Asadollah Beiraghi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Chemistry, Kharazmi University, 15719-14911Tehran, Iran
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A natural clinoptilolite nanostructure (CNS) along with ultrasonic irradiation was used to remove Cu2+ ions from polluted water. In the first part of this work, natural clinoptilolite was converted to CNS by ball milling. The natural clinoptilolite and prepared CNS samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, N2 adsorption/desorption and pH at the point of zero charge analyses. The SEM images showed the development of CNS from natural clinoptilolite by ball milling. The N2 adsorption/desorption and FTIR spectroscopy confirmed the greater specific surface area, pore volume and number of surface groups of the CNS compared to the natural clinoptilolite. In addition, the crystalline phase of the CNS was the same as the natural clinoptilolite. In the second part of this work, the ultrasonic-assisted sorption of Cu2+ ions from polluted water by CNS was investigated. These experiments were optimized with response surface methodology based on central composite designs. The effects of initial pH of solution, CNS dosage, sonication time and temperature on Cu2+ ion-removal efficiency were investigated. By using a CNS dosage of 500 mg L−1, an initial pH of 6, a sonication time of 12 min and a sonication temperature of 45°C as optimal conditions, 97% of Cu2+ ions were removed from contaminated water. The initial pH was the most effective variable. Ultrasonic-assisted sorption of Cu2+ was more effective than sorption alone, onto the CNS.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright© Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2019
Figure 0

Table 1. Actual and coded levels of the variables used for the ultrasonic-assisted sorption process by CCD.

Figure 1

Table 2. Experimental design and the results of the CCD.

Figure 2

Fig. 1. SEM images of (a) the natural clinoptilolite particles and (b) CNS, (c) size distribution and (d) energy-dispersive X-ray spectra of the CNS produced.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of the natural clinoptilolite and CNS samples. STP = standard temperature and pressure.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. XRD traces of the (a) natural clinoptilolite and (b) CNS samples.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. FTIR spectra of the natural clinoptilolite and CNS samples.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. ΔpH vs pHi plots for the determination of pHpzc of the natural clinoptilolite and CNS samples.

Figure 7

Table 3. ANOVA for the response surface quadratic model.

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Effect of sonication temperature and CNS dosage on the removal efficiency of copper ions (experimental conditions: pH = 4, [Cu2+]0 = 10 mg L−1, sonication time = 6 min).

Figure 9

Fig. 7. Effect of initial pH and sonication time on the removal efficiency of copper ions (experimental conditions: [Cu2+]0 = 10 mg L−1, sonication temperature = 25°C).

Figure 10

Fig. 8. Percentage effect of each model term obtained using Pareto analysis.

Figure 11

Fig. 9. Comparison of Cu2+ removal (%) by precipitation and sorption on natural clinoptilolite microstructures and CNS with ultrasonic-assisted sorption of Cu2+ using CNS (experimental conditions: sorbent dosage = 500 mg L−1, [Cu2+]0 = 10 mg L−1, initial pH = 6, sonication time = 12 min, sonication temperature = 45°C).

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Langmuir isotherms for Cu2+ sorption onto (a) natural clinoptilolite and (b) CNS and Freundlich isotherms for Cu2+ sorption onto (c) natural clinoptilolite and (d) CNS.

Figure 13

Table 4. Langmuir and Freundlich parameters for sorption of Cu2+ on the natural clinoptilolite and CNS samples.

Figure 14

Table 5. Reported equilibrium sorption capacity for Cu2+ on natural clinoptilolite samples in comparison with CNS samples.