Introduction
This paper summarizes the discussions during a two-day expert meeting which took place in Amsterdam, The Netherlands in June 2011. The meeting was sponsored by Dr. Willmar Schwabe Pharmaceuticals. The main aim was to review the available preclinical and clinical data on Ginkgo biloba special extract EGb 761® in the context of recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer's disease AD. Nineteen dementia experts, from Australia, Asia, Europe and North America, participated, covering the disciplines of bio- and neurochemistry, gerontology, neurology, pharmacology, and psychiatry.
Methods
Available evidence from pre-clinical research such as the effects of EGb 761® on mitochondrial function, neuroplasticity, neurotransmission and protein clearance as well as clinical data in dementia and in early intervention was reviewed (Eckert, Reference Eckert2012; Ihl, Reference Ihl2012; Kasper, Reference Kasper2012; Kehr et al., Reference Kehr, Yoshitake, Ijiri, Koch, Nöldner and Yoshitake2012; Müller et al., Reference Müller, Heiser and Leuner2012) and put into context with recent developments in dementia research (Hampel, Reference Hampel2012; Behl, Reference Behl2012). These data formed the basis of the discussion and the key points are presented in the results section of this paper.
The discussion participants were:
• Alexander V. Amelin, Pavlov State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia
• Natalya Bachinskaya, Gerontology Institute of the Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kiew, Ukraine
• Christian Behl, Institute for Pathobiochemistry, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
• David A. Bennett, Rush University Medical Center and Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Chicago, USA
• Anne Eckert, Neurobiology Laboratory For Brain Aging and Mental Health, Psychiatric University Clinics, Basel, Switzerland
• Serge Gauthier, McGill Center for Studies in Aging, Verdun, Canada
• Harald Hampel, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine & Psychotherapy, Goethe University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
• Seol-Heui Han, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk, Korea
• Martin Haupt, Neuro-Centrum, Düsseldorf, Germany
• Reinhard Heun, Derby City General Hospital, Derby, UK
• Bernd Ibach, Psychiatrische Klinik, Münsterlingen, Switzerland
• Ralf Ihl, Maria-Hilf Hospital, Krefeld, Germany
• Siegfried Kasper, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
• Jan Kehr, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
• Nicola Lautenschlager, Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, St. Vincent's Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Australia
• Simeon Marasigan, University of Sto Tomas/Faculty of Medicine and Surgery Sampaloc, Manila, Philippines
• Walter E. Müller, Department of Pharmacology, Biocenter, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
• Olaf Schröder, NeuroProof GmbH, Rostock, Germany
• Gary W. Small, Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA
Results
Specificity of effects
It is important for preclinical studies to use the same extract that would be used in humans. A plant extract as active ingredient is defined by both the origin, quality, and composition of the raw material and the production process. Leaves harvested from dedicated plantations in the USA, France and other regions and subjected to more than 20 standardized process steps result in the specific extract EGb 761®. Its composition differs considerably from dried Ginkgo leaves, as relevant constituents like terpene lactones and flavone glycosides are enriched while undesired compounds like ginkgolic acids, biflavones, certain proanthocyanidines, lipophilic compounds and contaminants are removed. Therefore, results from studies with EGb 761® cannot be extrapolated to other Ginkgo extract preparations and vice versa.
Replication of significant EGb 761® findings with single fractions or single compounds of the extract would facilitate interpretation of the data. In a molecular biology context, attribution of specific effects to specific compounds supports the rationale for use of a multi-target compound like EGb 761®. Improved availability of dopamine and acetylcholine in the prefrontal cortex could already be attributed to Ginkgo-specific acylated flavonols (Kehr et al., Reference Kehr, Yoshitake, Ijiri, Koch, Nöldner and Yoshitake2012), neuroplasticity partly to isorhamnetine (Müller et al., Reference Müller, Heiser and Leuner2012) while mitochondrial effects have been observed with flavonoids, bilobalide, and the ginkgolides B and J (Eckert, Reference Eckert2012).
Mitochondrial function as a key mode of action?
While the flavonoids definitively show radical-scavenging properties, the properties of EGb 761® go beyond that simple mechanism and clearly indicate that it is not just an antioxidant. Mitochondrial protection and functional improvement can explain some of the preclinical and clinical effects of EGb 761® in AD and age-related cognitive decline. Protection of mitochondrial function would not only explain the enhanced production of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) but also the anti-apoptotic properties, because mitochondria are also relevant for apoptosis. Mitochondrial function also contributes to improved neuroplasticity, as neuritic outgrowth and synaptic plasticity are highly energy demanding processes, and Aß-regulation, as reactive oxygen species from dysfunctional mitochondria upregulate amyloidogenic Aß-turnover.
Some findings, however, such as improved neurotransmission (Kehr et al., Reference Kehr, Yoshitake, Ijiri, Koch, Nöldner and Yoshitake2012) or effects on protein clearance (Behl et al., unpublished data) cannot be explained by improvements in mitochondrial function. Therefore, EGb 761 can really be conceptualized as a multi-target compound with demonstrated activity on distinct pathophysiological pathways in AD and age-related cognitive decline (Hampel, Reference Hampel2012).
Dose finding for disease modification
Current clinical dosing recommendations for symptomatic treatment with EGb 761 have been developed over five decades of clinical research guidelines. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the 240 mg daily dose have been demonstrated by a series of clinical trials in thousands of patients (Ihl, Reference Ihl2012; Kasper, Reference Kasper2012). As poor compliance has been associated with lack of efficacy in dementia prevention trials using 240 mg/day dosing (Kasper, Reference Kasper2012), a lower dose is unlikely to produce disease-modifying effects. Good tolerability has been reported for higher doses in small single-dose trials, but a maximum tolerated dose has never been established for chronic dosing. Therefore the optimal dose when looking for disease modifying effects has not been rigorously established.
Can pharmacokinetics contribute to dosing recommendations? The kinetics of constituents like terpene lactones in animals and humans are known. Substantial plasma levels can be reached by clinical doses, and animal data demonstrate substantial brain penetration by major ingredients of EGb761®. The concentrations seen for single constituents in the brain are rather small, but they demonstrate efficacy in cognition, so the concentrations needed are probably in a low range. However, because (1) a plant extract like EGb 761 contains multiple active ingredients with the extract being more active than the sum of major constituents in preclinical models, (2) EGb 761 requires chronic dosing and has no relevant acute single dose activity in animal models or in humans, and (3) multiple pathophysiologic alterations finally lead to cognitive declines and dementia and there is no magic bullet target structure, blood or brain kinetics of single constituents are of limited value for the determination of clinically active dosing regimens. Long-term studies or biomarker trials are probably the best way to gather more knowledge and it would be interesting to see what doses could be optimal in the disease-modifying setting.
Bridging the link between pre-clinical and clinical research
Various types of pathophysiology may contribute to the clinical picture of Alzheimer's disease (AD). From a clinician's perspective, it is important for experimental studies to be conducted as closely as possible to the clinical situation. The task is how to identify mechanisms that are relevant for a disease that develops over 40 years. Although it is interesting to identify a potential pathophysiological mechanism through studies in cell cultures, Caenorhabditis elegans or transgenic animals, clinicians are interested in its effect on memory problems. Bridging work is therefore needed for Gingko biloba as for any other multi-target compounds for which experimental doses cannot be transferred directly to humans to close the gap between pre-clinical research and the clinical situation. This might be more feasible now with the emergence of sensitive functional imaging methods that allow detailed imaging of the brain under standardized conditions and at relatively little expense (Hampel, Reference Hampel2012).
In most animal experiments, the effects of EGb 761® are clearly dose dependent, and doses higher than those used in clinical practice are frequently administered. For example, in rodents the most usual dose is 100 mg/kg/day, whereas the human dose is 240 mg/day. It is important to consider to what extent effects observed with such doses translate to humans, as different concepts are involved in calculating the adequate allometric dose.
The problem of translating doses from animals to humans is not specific to Ginkgo biloba or plant extracts but is a general problem for all drugs. Combining pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic research can be helpful when interpreting plasma levels of a synthetic drug as this can provide some correlation between the levels found in the plasma of animals and what would be expected in humans. For plant extracts, this approach is of limited utility for the reasons outlined above.
Suitable clinical trial designs
Interpretation of completed dementia prevention trials with EGb 761® can be complicated by poor drug compliance and unexpectedly low dementia incidence rates (Kasper, Reference Kasper2012). As available data give a promising signal for the disease-modifying effect of this well-tolerated compound if taken regularly and long enough, adequate trial design of early intervention trials deserves special attention.
Biomarker-based enriched samples
An attractive approach is to enrich trials with participants at increased risk of disease progression with well-defined target mechanisms in order to increase the likelihood of positive outcomes with an intervention. This approach has gained merit in heterogeneous diseases, such as cancer, but may not be so appropriate in chronic diseases such as AD. Indeed, large-scale studies of cancer and prevention of cardiovascular disease often include 100,000 people or more, but study populations of this size are impractical when it is necessary to perform regular lumbar punctures, carbon 11-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and when specialists need to see patients every six months to determine whether participants are converting to mild cognitive impairment (MCI). In this setting, therefore, different design options should be considered.
Exploratory experimental epidemiologic design
An alternative approach would be an exploratory experimental epidemiologic study, in which exposure to the product under investigation would be randomized from the start, but entry criteria would be very broad. Such a trial would include a large number of participants (2,000–3,000) with subjective memory complaints and follow them for a period of two to four years. The outcome for a trial designed in such a way would be repeated measures of cognition. All covariates other than cognitive complaints, such as genetic profile and biomarkers, would be determined at baseline and regular intervals but would not be an entry criteria. Such a study could be conducted in the community, except for frail elderly participants who might have to attend tertiary care medical centers. Depending on the regulations of the country where the trial is conducted, the study would not necessarily need a doctor or nurse; instead, psychometricians and phlebotomists could measure the covariates and obtain blood, with repeated measures of cognition assessed on the telephone. Patients could be recruited in the community at a low entry threshold. With a carefully planned study design that includes sufficient covariates and a large enough population, a standard epidemiologic approach could then be used to identify characteristics of patients who would benefit most from an intervention with EGb 761®. In this way, a number of research questions could be approached in parallel rather than sequentially, with all of the relevant questions built into a single protocol without the need for a series of studies.
Disease stage
The process of cognitive decline is a continuum. Whichever population a study includes, the underlying research is essentially investigating AD-related changes that are present in virtually every brain: for example, infarcts are present in at least half of brains and Lewy bodies in 20% of brains. As people at different stages of disease do not actually have different underlying pathophysiological or biological mechanisms, stratification by disease stage creates an artificial and unnecessary divide when the overriding aim is to measure changes in cognition. Labeling people with different disease stages also changes a continuous outcome that could be measured by a college graduate or research assistant to a dichotomous outcome that requires assessment by a specialized clinician, complicating the process and making it more expensive. Capturing detailed information about a wide range of patients from the outset enriches the dataset and enables detailed analysis to identify a subgroup of potential responders.
Biomarkers as surrogate endpoints
An alternative approach could be small pharmacodynamic studies to show that the effects demonstrated in animal studies translate to humans. Impact on mitochondrial function, apoptosis or dopaminergic transmission could be investigated. Depending on the target mechanism, an appropriate at-risk population can be determined. One of the advantages of research using biomarkers is that it can help to elucidate the underlying biology of the disease. On the other hand, this approach fails when a change in a biomarker is observed but there is no effect on the disease course or clinical symptoms, which is all too common. The concern would be that a therapy is shown to improve a surrogate marker but the patients’ disease still worsens. Cholesterol and blood pressure are perfect surrogate markers for cardiovascular disease because the disease risk alters with the marker. Such a link between marker and disease risk needs to be proven in the setting of AD.
Mixed symptoms and etiology
The inclusion of patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms has resulted in larger benefits with EGb 761® in cognitive, ADL and global measures (Ihl, Reference Ihl2012), probably because these patients show a relevant decline over a half-year period typical of most clinical studies. Treatment effects in patients with vascular or mixed dementia have been comparable to AD. Many researchers choose to exclude people with vascular disease or with neuropsychiatric symptoms from trials involving patients with AD, though MCI or dementia patients with such mixed presentations are frequent. Their exclusion means that there is limited evidence on such patient populations for other anti-dementia compounds. As EGb 761 is not restricted by a registration license specific to AD, studies that include a broader population of patients with dementia or cognitive decline will generate results that are more relevant to clinical practice.
Summary
Studying the complex multi-target compound EGb 761® in a complex chronic disease like AD and cognitive decline poses many research questions – from describing and identifying the most promising underlying mechanisms to patient selection and clinical trial designs. Overall, the experience of this meeting suggests that a targeted exchange of knowledge and ideas between experts from basic science and clinical backgrounds might be what is needed to identify the most promising next steps in research to work towards effective treatments. There is enough promising data, both pre-clinical and clinical, to consider future research into EGb 761® and cognitive impairment in old age as a worthwhile activity.
Conflict of interest
Nicola T. Lautenschlager is Editor-in-Chief of International Psychogeriatrics. This paper therefore underwent independent review under the supervision of a Deputy-Editor. The authors received financial support from Dr. Willmar Schwabe Pharmaceuticals to attend and participate in the meeting.
Description of authors' roles
N. T. Lautenschlager wrote the paper, with contributions from R. Ihl and W. E. Müller.