Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:39:24.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cochlear implantation after selective vestibular nerve section

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

C Martens ,
A Csillag ,
M Davies  and
P Fagan
C Martens*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery/Skull Base Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
A Csillag
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Imaging, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
M Davies
Affiliation:
Hearing Innovations, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
P Fagan
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery/Skull Base Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Camilla Martens, Department of Otolaryngology, St Vincent's Hospital, 390 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW, Australia 2010 Fax: + 61 2 9332 7234 E-mail: camillamartens@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Vestibular nerve section is a highly effective procedure for the control of vertigo in patients with Ménière's disease. However, hearing loss is a possible complication. If hearing loss occurs after vestibular nerve section, magnetic resonance imaging should make it possible to establish the presence or absence of an intact cochlear nerve.

Method:

Case report and review of the world literature concerning cochlear implantation after vestibular nerve section.

Case report:

We present a patient who developed subtotal hearing loss after vestibular nerve section. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to verify the presence of an intact cochlear nerve, enabling successful cochlear implantation.

Conclusion:

To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of cochlear implantation carried out after selective vestibular nerve section. Given recent advances in cochlear implantation, this case indicates that it is essential to make every effort to spare the cochlear nerve if vestibular nerve section is required. If hearing loss occurs after vestibular nerve section, magnetic resonance imaging should be undertaken to establish whether the cochlear nerve is intact.

Keywords

Cochlear ImplantsVestibular NerveMeniere DiseaseHearing lossMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Information

Type
Clinical Records
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 127 , Issue 3 , March 2013 , pp. 311 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013

Introduction

In this report, we present a patient with subtotal hearing loss, who had previously undergone a selective vestibular nerve section. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies confirmed the presence of a cochlear nerve on the operated side, enabling successful cochlear implantation.

Case report

A 70-year-old white man presented with subtotal hearing loss. In 1994, he had developed unilateral Ménière's disease for which he had undergone a right vestibular nerve section. Hearing had been preserved. However, over subsequent years his hearing had progressively deteriorated in both ears, until he re-presented in 2010 with subtotal hearing loss. Hearing was better in the left ear; however, hearing aid benefit was minimal and the patient reported that amplification caused distortion of sound.

It was decided that the patient was a suitable candidate for cochlear implantation.

Pre-operatively, audiography and MRI examination were performed (Figures 1 to 3), the latter verifying that the right cochlear nerve was intact.

Fig. 1

Pre-surgery audiogram using live-voice Bamford–Kowal–Bench sentences; results were 88 per cent correct. Only the left ear could be aided. With aiding of the left ear, the speech perception score for the prerecorded condition (65 dBHL) was 24 per cent. These results indicated the patient was within the current audiological criteria for cochlear implantation of either the right or left ear.

Fig. 2

Images from a 1.5 T, three-dimensional, Fast Imaging Employing Steady-state Acquisition (‘FIESTA’) magnetic resonance imaging sequence through the internal auditory meatus. (a) Axial image showing location of the oblique sagittal reformatted images through the internal auditory meatus on the right (b) and left (c). Part (b) demonstrates post-operative attenuation of the right cochlear and vestibular nerves. To enable comparison, part (c) shows the normal-sized vestibular and cochlear nerves. As the vestibular nerve section was performed in the cerebellopontine angle, the attenuated right vestibular nerve contrasts markedly with the normal thickness, volume and size of the left vestibular nerve at the corresponding level. VII = facial nerve

Fig. 3

Images from a 1.5 T, three-dimensional, Fast Imaging Employing Steady-state Acquisition (‘FIESTA’) magnetic resonance imaging sequence through the cerebellopontine angle. (a) Axial image showing location of the oblique sagittal reformatted images through the cerebellopontine angle on the right (b) and left (c). Part (b) demonstrates post-operative attenuation of the right vestibulocochlear nerve (VIII); subsequent events proved that this nerve consisted solely of the cochlear division. To enable comparison, part (c) shows a normal-sized left vestibulocochlear nerve. VII = facial nerve

Cochlear implantation was carried out on the right side using a Cochlear Nucleus CI512 Cochlear Implant with Contour Advance electrode (Cochlear Ltd, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia).

The device was activated three weeks later using a Nucleus CP800 Sound Processor. All 22 intracochlear electrodes were operating and within compliance. All 22 electrodes produced an auditory percept. At two weeks post-activation, two mid-array electrodes were disabled due to non-auditory sensation felt at the right upper side of the head.

Initial testing of open-set speech perception of live-voice Bamford–Kowal–Bench (‘BKB’) sentences resulted in a score of 78 per cent with the device activated and 66 per cent with the device inactivated. This was without a hearing aid.

Further follow up was done by telephone as the patient lived in a remote area; there was no further investigation. The patient reported significant benefit from his right cochlear implant during everyday conversation.

Discussion

A survey of the literature identified no other cases of cochlear implantation carried out after selective vestibular nerve section. Thus, we believe that the presented patient represents the first reported case. Lustig et al. have described cochlear implantation after acoustic tumour removal, which is in effect a vestibular nerve section.Reference Lustig, Yeagle, Niparko and Minor1 However, from our reading of this paper, it would seem that it was the contralateral ear that was implanted.

  • • Vestibular nerve section effectively controls vertigo in Ménière's disease

  • • If there is subsequent hearing loss, magnetic resonance imaging is needed to check for an intact cochlear nerve

  • • Recent advances in cochlear implantation mean that this may be possible in such patients

  • • Thus, vestibular nerve section should aim to spare the cochlear nerve

  • • A successfully implanted case is presented

Magnetic resonance imaging has been used to establish the presence of a cochlear nerve in cases of labyrinthine dysplasia and cochleovestibular malformation.Reference Zanetti, Guida, Barezzani, Campovecchi, Nassif and Pinelli2–Reference Govaerts, Casselman, Daemers, De Beukelaer, Yperman and De Ceulaer4 In most cases, modern MRI sequences should make it possible to establish the presence or absence of an adequate cochlear nerve.

Conclusion

If vestibular nerve section is to be carried out for Ménière's disease or for any other reason, it is essential that every effort be made to spare the cochlear nerve, as cochlear implantation may be a future possibility given recent advances in this field.

If hearing loss occurs after vestibular nerve section, MRI should be undertaken to investigate whether the cochlear nerve is intact.

References

1Lustig, LR, Yeagle, J, Niparko, JK, Minor, LB. Cochlear implantation in patients with bilateral Ménière's syndrome. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:397–403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Zanetti, D, Guida, M, Barezzani, MG, Campovecchi, C, Nassif, N, Pinelli, L et al. Favorable outcome of cochlear implant in VIIIth nerve deficiency. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:815–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Warren, FM 3rd, Wiggins, RH 3rd, Pitt, C, Harnsberger, HR, Shelton, C. Apparent cochlear nerve aplasia: to implant or not to implant? Otol Neurotol 2010;31:1088–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Govaerts, PJ, Casselman, J, Daemers, K, De Beukelaer, C, Yperman, M, De Ceulaer, G. Cochlear implants in aplasia and hypoplasia of the cochleovestibular nerve. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:887–91CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Pre-surgery audiogram using live-voice Bamford–Kowal–Bench sentences; results were 88 per cent correct. Only the left ear could be aided. With aiding of the left ear, the speech perception score for the prerecorded condition (65 dBHL) was 24 per cent. These results indicated the patient was within the current audiological criteria for cochlear implantation of either the right or left ear.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Images from a 1.5 T, three-dimensional, Fast Imaging Employing Steady-state Acquisition (‘FIESTA’) magnetic resonance imaging sequence through the internal auditory meatus. (a) Axial image showing location of the oblique sagittal reformatted images through the internal auditory meatus on the right (b) and left (c). Part (b) demonstrates post-operative attenuation of the right cochlear and vestibular nerves. To enable comparison, part (c) shows the normal-sized vestibular and cochlear nerves. As the vestibular nerve section was performed in the cerebellopontine angle, the attenuated right vestibular nerve contrasts markedly with the normal thickness, volume and size of the left vestibular nerve at the corresponding level. VII = facial nerve

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Images from a 1.5 T, three-dimensional, Fast Imaging Employing Steady-state Acquisition (‘FIESTA’) magnetic resonance imaging sequence through the cerebellopontine angle. (a) Axial image showing location of the oblique sagittal reformatted images through the cerebellopontine angle on the right (b) and left (c). Part (b) demonstrates post-operative attenuation of the right vestibulocochlear nerve (VIII); subsequent events proved that this nerve consisted solely of the cochlear division. To enable comparison, part (c) shows a normal-sized left vestibulocochlear nerve. VII = facial nerve