Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T06:50:59.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Endosperm and starch granule morphology in wild cereal relatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

F. M. Shapter
Affiliation:
Grain Foods CRC, Centre for Plant Conservation Genetics, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW, 2480 Australia
R. J. Henry*
Affiliation:
Grain Foods CRC, Centre for Plant Conservation Genetics, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW, 2480 Australia
L. S. Lee*
Affiliation:
Grain Foods CRC, Centre for Plant Conservation Genetics, Southern Cross University, PO Box 157, Lismore, NSW, 2480 Australia
*
* Corresponding author. E-mail: fshapter@scu.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Australia's native grass species contain a diverse array of wild cereal relatives which are adapted to a broader range of environmental conditions than current commercial cereals and may contain novel alleles which have utility in commercial production systems. Characterizing the available variation in endosperm morphology is one of the first steps towards in planta manipulation of endosperm by either the introgression of novel alleles or bioengineering cereal starch and protein. The endosperm of 19 crop wild relatives (CWR) was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Mature caryopses were fixed, dehydrated, critical-point dried and then snap fractured transversely through the grain. Wild relatives exhibited similar types of starch granules to that of their respective cultivated species, though in general the wild species retained a greater proportion of the endosperm cell wall at maturity. The two species examined with no closely related cultivated species exhibited a rice-like endosperm. Wild sorghum relatives exhibited an abundance of endosperm variations described as variations in starch granule size, shape and surface morphology, and the distribution of protein bodies. This is particularly important because the grain of Sorghum bicolor has inherently low starch and protein digestibility. These variations within the wild relatives of commercial cereals may provide novel sources of genetic diversity for future grain improvement programmes.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NIAB 2008
Figure 0

Table 1 Table of accession details for specimen identification and collection records of 19 Australian wild crop relatives

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Representative images of wild grain endosperm exhibiting rice-starch starch granule structure. (a) Oryza australiensis, (b) Oryza rufipogon, (c) Microlaena stipoides, (d) Microlaena stipoides endosperm cell wall at high magnification with visible pores, (e) Astrebla lappacea, (f) Austrostipa aristiglumis. S, Starch granule; C, channels; E, endosperm cell wall; B, protein bodies; M, protein matrix; P, pores; X, exudate; D, dimples.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Partial schematic of the phylogenetic relationships within the Pooideae. Adapted from Kellogg (2002).

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Representative images of the Triticeae endosperm morphology examined. (a) and (b) Wheat, Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring; (c) and (d) barley, Hordeum vulgare cv. Chebec; (e) and (f) Elymus scaber. Sa, A-type starch granule; Sb, B-type starch granule; E, endosperm cell wall; M, protein matrix; P, pores; X, exudate; G, equatorial groove.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Representative images of the variation in endosperm morphology observed in Sorghum species by scanning electron microscopy. (a) S. bicolor, (b) S. timorense, (c) S. extans, (d) S. leiocladum. S, Starch granule; R, rice-like starch granules; B, protein bodies; M, protein matrix; D, dimpling; P, pores; C, channels; Cp, compound granules.

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Representative images of the variation in mid-endosperm morphology in Sorghum species. (a) S. bicolor, (b) S. laxiflorum, (c) S. brachypodum, (d) S. stipoideum, (e) S. leiocladum, (f) S. angustum. S, Starch granule; R, rice-like granules; B, protein bodies; M, protein matrix; P, pores; C, channels; D, dimpling; X, exudate.

Figure 6

Fig. 6 Representative images of the variation in central endosperm morphology observed in Sorghum species. (a) S. bicolor, (b) S. laxiflorum, (c) S. timorense, (d) S. nitidum, (e) S. brachypodum, (f) S. leiocladum. S, Starch granule, R, rice-like granules; B, protein bodies; M, protein matrix; P, pores; C, channels; X, exudate.

Figure 7

Table 2 Species distribution table of the representative endosperm types across the three regions of Sorghum endosperm

Figure 8

Fig. 7 Representative images of the sheared endosperm morphology observed in some Sorghum species. (a) S. stipoideum, (b) S. bulbosum. S, Starch granule; B, protein bodies; M, protein matrix; C, channels; D, dimpling.