Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T06:11:58.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Topology of voids and channels in selected porphyrinic compounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2019

Lawrence P. Cook*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA Materials Science and Engineering Program, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA
Greg A. Brewer
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064, USA
Daniel Siderius
Affiliation:
Chemical Science Division, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA
Winnie Wong-Ng
Affiliation:
Materials Measurement Science Division, The National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA
*
a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: cooklp@cua.edu

Abstract

Porphyrinic compounds are of increasing interest to the materials science community, yet little attention has been paid to crystallographically controlled voids and channels in these materials. We have conducted an initial survey of the voids and channels in a random subset of 1000 porphyrinic compounds with known crystal structures. From calculations using a rolling-probe subroutine, we have found that about 5% of these compounds have line-of-sight channels, which differ in their topology depending on the crystallography. A small but significant number of porphyrinic compounds have calculated void contents of >25 volume %. We discuss in detail the void and channel characteristics, including pore-size distribution, of four representative compounds, with technological implications.

Information

Type
Technical Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Structure of the porphyrin macrocycle, showing β and meso substituent bonding sites. Blue = π-bonding network.

Figure 1

TABLE I. Dimensions of some adsorbate molecules (Breck, 1974; Li and Talu, 1993; Matteucci, et al., 2006; Ismail et al., 2015; Gao et al., 2016).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Structure of PCN-224(Ni), precursor to PCN-202(Ni)-Zr. Cyan = 6-connected Zr6 clusters, magenta = nickel (Yuan et al., 2018).

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Voids and channels in PCN-202(Ni)-Zr viewed approximately down [111]. Note: in this and subsequent figures, the inside of voids is indicated in red, the outside in yellow. (b) Voids and channels in PCN-202(Ni)-Zr unit cell viewed down the a-axis.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Pore-size distribution in BEPVIE. Uncertainty is indicated by error bars, which correspond to 95% confidence intervals on the mean PSD computed via jackknife analysis of 10 replicate calculations.

Figure 5

TABLE II. Crystal data for PCN-202(Ni)-Zr (Yuan et al., 2018).

Figure 6

Figure 5. Voids and channels in CAYROK unit cell viewed down the c-axis.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Pore-size distribution (PSD) in CAYROK, BUPHUP, and BASLAJ. Uncertainty is indicated by error bars, which correspond to 95% confidence intervals on the mean PSD computed via jackknife analysis of 10 replicate calculations for each material.

Figure 8

TABLE III. Crystal data for pyridyldiphenyl zinc porphyrin (Deiters et al., 2005).

Figure 9

Figure 7. Channels in BUPHUP unit cell viewed down the c-axis.

Figure 10

TABLE IV. Crystal data for tetramethyl porphyrin nickel iodide (Pace et al., 1983).

Figure 11

Figure 8. Schematic structural diagram of BASLAJ (Cambridge Center for Crystal Data, 2019).

Figure 12

Figure 9. (a) Channels in BASLAJ viewed down the a-axis. (b) Channels in BASLAJ viewed down the b-axis. (c) Channels in BASLAJ viewed down the c-axis. (d) Channels in BASLAJ viewed down [011]. (e) Channels in BASLAJ viewed from an inclined perspective.

Figure 13

TABLE V. Crystal data for phthalocyanine-octaethyl porphyrin neodymium (Bian et al., 2003).

Figure 14

Figure 10. Calculated powder X-ray diffraction patterns for (a) BEPVIE, (b) CAYROK, (c) BUPHUP, (d) BASLAJ. CuKα radiation. Calculations were completed using Mercury 4.1.0.

Figure 15

Figure 11. Cyclohexane, C6H12. Red = apical hydrogens, blue = equatorial hydrogens.