Knox et al. (Reference Knox2020) contained an error in the description of a numeric result. In describing a result in Table 1, the article stated: “For example, while the approach in Fryer (2019) implies a statistically insignificant 2.4 instances per 1,000 encounters of pushing Hispanic suspects to a wall due to suspect race, our revised estimate shows the true number is at least 26—eleven times larger.” This line should have read: “For example, while the approach in Fryer (2019) implies a statistically insignificant 2.4 instances per 1,000 encounters of pushing Hispanic suspects to a wall due to suspect race, our revised estimate shows the true number is at least 22—nine times larger.” Thus, while estimates in Table 1 remain correct, the main-text discussion erroneously referred to the wrong entry in the table.

The authors regret the error.